Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 6%Less than half day
- 35%Less than a day
- 35%One day
- 13%More than one day
- 10%Two days or more
- 13%It comes with a clean operating system
- 71%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 16%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 19%Once a year
- 42%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
- O mais bonito que já tive. Em breve o NFC fará falta. Tampa traseira curvada risca muito facilmente.
O design é o melhor que há para mim disponível no meu país. Falta de um fone de ouvido melhorPros
- Bordas finas
- Falta NFC
- Falta Biometria
- Adicionar fones intra-auriculares
- Atualização para Android Oreo
- AutoCute, comfortable, lightweight and good performance.
I have the version of Argentina and it was never updated to android oreo. The cameras during the day are almost excellent but at night they are very regular. The day-to-day performance is not bad at all, the games move smoothly but the most demanding do not run at 60 FPS, but in general the performance is good. The screen is spectacular and is very comfortable and light. But a very serious problem is that it overheats, but the problem is solved by installing an external launcher. The battery lasts a whole day with an exciting use.Pros
- Daytime cameras
- Very resistant
- Lack of fingerprint sensor
- Lack of type c usb port
- Cameras during the night
- AutoA mobile that despite its low price would not recommend at all for its low performance in many aspects, there are better options
The design is something personal, I would say that it is minimalist and it is fine, its screen is something of the only good thing it has since it is full HD +, its battery is bad and it degrades easily, it has a very low-end processor, which despite that can move the day-to-day tasks makes them difficult and does not involve heavy games. Finally, the camera in terms of the front is a fairly normal one that could be improved and in terms of the rear it lacks some resolution. Also due to the shortcomings of this device they could have put at least 64gb instead of 32Pros
- His resistance to falls
- Your screen
- Its minimalist design
- Very low range processor
- Front and rear camera
- Its little storage and ram
- Your price inflated
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 4.6 Performance & Hardware
- 4.6 Camera
- 6.3 Connectivity
- 3.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.