LG Q60 reviews by real users LG Q60
- 6.26"LCD IPSHD+19:9
- 155 g77.0 mm161.3 mm8.7 mm
- Helio P22 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 64 GB
- v? 75.450
- 3500 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 2SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 9.0 P Android 9.0 Pie
User score
Design & Materials
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Performance & Hardware
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Camera
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Connectivity
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 56%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 11%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
9 reviews
Software
- 11%It comes with a clean operating system
- 67%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 22%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
9 reviews
- 0%Never
- 25%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
9 reviews
User reviews
- AutoBuy yourself another mobile
Software with many defects (no screen recording, no wireless projection, no radio, etc), in addition to a very poor battery and a processor that leaves much to be desired. A decent camera if in day-to-day photos (documents, for example) In addition, it can take up to 2 hours to charge the mobile from 0 to 100%.
Pros- Camera (more or less)
- Decent screen
Cons- Battery
- Processor
- Lack of software features
- Horrible load
View original review- 2.2
- Screen6.2
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoEvery time it is updated, LG introduces worse functions and less sophisticated forms, that is, it gets worse. CHEATED
I think that it does not improve when it is updated, in general, and I think that for commercial reasons, what is promoted is a worsening of the operation of the mobile, on purpose.
Pros- THERE IS NO CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE PRICE AND THE VALUE
Cons- IT IS NOT IMPROVED WHEN UPDATING
View original review- 0
- Screen4.5
- Performance3.3
- Camera2.7
- Connectivity2.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoI consider that several things have improved this year. The battery is very good. I arrive at the end of the day and I have plenty. Fast charge
For a user not very demanding with processors I recommend this terminal ... The improvement could be the processor and a little the quality of the main camera
Pros- Battery
- Design
- Front camera
- Customization layer
Cons- Performance (processor)
- Screen quality
- Face ID missing
- Fingerprint reader
View original review- 7.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt is acceptable, but not for its range or its price does not make it feasible.
It is a phone that seeing the rest and what they are worth this is not worth it, it has a very fair processor since it is low range and not because it is mediatek but by the designated processor itself, little RAM to be mid-range and its HD screen Nor does it speak well with its low brightness, having a microUSB without a fast charge also breaks it a lot before others and if it has a military certificate but is scratched with nothing, it is a phone for little demanding people but for what it is worth you take better phones home And you save money.
Pros- Design
- Main camera
- Small battery but with endurance
Cons- Low end processor
- MicroUSB and no fast charge
- Brightness of the screen
- Despite the military certificate is quite scratched
- low RAM
- Value for money
View original review- 2.4
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 6.8
- Screen6.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.