you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Edge 30 reviews by real users Motorola Edge 30
- "Ki" Value for Money Score7.8
- Pros
- Display quality
- Performance
Cons- Updates
- Short battery life
- Price
- Overheating
- 6.5"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 155 g74.2 mm159.4 mm6.8 mm
- SnapD. 778 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 609.900 v10
- 4020 mAh 33 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 50 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.25
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 43
- 18
- 3
- 2
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this smartphone to offer excellent value for money, highlighting its lightweight and compact design, and its general performance. However, battery life and overheating are recurring points of concern.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 144Hz AMOLED screen is high quality, very fluid, and offers an excellent multimedia experience, although some mention that the brightness could be better.
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and medium-demanding games thanks to the Snapdragon 778G+. However, in demanding games or prolonged use, the device tends to overheat and may experience FPS drops.
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera offers good results, especially during the day and in 4K, but the selfie camera is mediocre or poor. Video stabilization generates mixed opinions.
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G connectivity is a plus. Opinions on software updates are varied, with some lamenting the lack of continuous support.
66 reviews
66 reviews
66 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the 4020mAh battery is the weakest point, with generally short battery life and a tendency to overheat, although the 33W fast charging is appreciated.
- 11%Less than half day
- 37%Less than a day
- 35%One day
- 14%More than one day
- 3%Two days or more
66 reviews
Software
- 35%It comes with a clean operating system
- 61%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
66 reviews
- 9%Never
- 10%Once a year
- 52%Every six months
- 29%Every two months or less
66 reviews
- Overall, the phone is great for people who want a balanced phone while still able to handle AAA gamesPros
- A good high-midrange SoC (Fabbed by TSMC)
- High quality screen (with DCI-P3 color accuracy)
- Very lean OS Install
Cons- The processor can get hot fast
- Low capacity battery
- Limited customization
- 9
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Very good overral phone especially i terms of performance for the low price of 120€
I got 650K antutu on v10.
Pros- Great performance
- Very smooth 144hz display
- Very durable screen
Cons- Battery goes bad after 2 years of usage
- 8.5
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - Not bad phone better than my Redmi Note 10 Pro
This phone is realy nice it has a lot of features nice oled display and good performace only thing is that its all plastic made and battery dont last for long.
Pros- Good performace
- Fast OS
- Good design
- Light
- Moto Gestures
- Perfect display
Cons- The battery is very bad
- All is plastic
- Heating a lot
- 8.7
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt's a good slim phone with a good screen and decent cameras.
This phone doesn't overheat, even with demanding games, but the battery lasts about 5 hours. It has withstood drops. Its back is matte, and its screen isn't too slippery. The bezels are barely noticeable; it's fluid but somewhat fast and rarely freezes.
Pros- Good flow
- Good screen
- Good sound
- Good temperature
- Resistant to normal drops
- Good processor
Cons- Battery
- Main camera
- Slim
- She feels fragile
- Buttons that don't last long
View original review- 7.1
- Screen6.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - 7.8
- Screen6.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoI've had this phone for over two years and...
This phone is more than adequate. It's a mid-range phone with good overall performance, or at least it was on Android 13 or Android 12 when it came out of the box. I feel like the phone was incredibly fast on those two software versions, haha. When Android 14 arrived, many optimization problems started to appear, and they're noticeable. I'm focusing on this because it's something I haven't seen many people mention. Although Android 14 isn't at the optimization level of its previous versions (on this phone), it's not a huge deal, but you can feel the lack of that spark it had in earlier Android versions. Besides, Motorola further limited the software in Android 14. Things like customization: I think and feel that Android 12 and 13 had more options and more personality. Speaking of other things, like games, Genshin runs at 30 fps on medium-low graphics settings, with stuttering and some glitches in the more demanding cutscenes, but it's playable if you have no other choice. The cameras are fine. As with all cameras, with a good day and good lighting you'll take a great photo, except for the front camera: the software gives it a "sweep" that looks horrible, but everything improves with GCam.
Pros- Performance
- Water and dust resistance aren't the best...
- ...but they saved me on several occasions
- The screen is great.
- Stereo sound, and good quality
- It has some really good custom ROMs
Cons- The battery lasts just enough when it's already old.
- Front camera (From the native photo app)
- You have to be careful because it gets hot.
- Building materials
- The shine outdoors
- The absence of Jack 3.5 is missed.
View original review- 7
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 12 days ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Features 2 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Name, RAM 3 years ago
- Camera 3 years ago
- AnTuTu 3 years ago
- On Sale 4 years ago
- Storage 4 years ago
Score
- 7.0 Design & Materials
- 6.8 Performance & Hardware
- 7.6 Camera
- 7.9 Connectivity
- 5.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
