you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Edge 40 Neo reviews by real users Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.2
- Pros
- Display quality
- Fast charge
- Design
Cons- Fragile
- Short battery life
- Overheating
- 6.55"pOLEDFHD+21:9
- 170 g72.0 mm159.6 mm7.8 mm
- Dimensity 7030 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 527.666 v10
- 5000 mAh 68 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 13 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 15 Android 15
User reviews
User score
- 43
- 10
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.8
- Camera8.1
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a very complete and balanced phone, offering excellent value for money. They highlight its premium design, smooth daily use, and good overall performance. However, concerns are raised regarding the screen's scratch resistance and overheating during demanding use.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the pOLED screen is a strong point, featuring vivid colors and 144Hz. The curved display is highly appreciated, though opinions on its maximum brightness are mixed.
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and multitasking. It performs well in demanding games, though overheating is noted as a weakness.
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the rear cameras perform well in daylight, and the Pro mode is a highlight. However, night photos and the front camera receive criticism for their quality.
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity stands out due to its IP68 certification and audio codecs. However, software updates are an area for improvement, and there have been issues with notifications.
54 reviews
54 reviews
54 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers acceptable duration, though some find it insufficient. The 68W fast charging is highly praised and effectively compensates for its autonomy.
- 4%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 31%One day
- 43%More than one day
- 15%Two days or more
54 reviews
Software
- 24%It comes with a clean operating system
- 72%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 4%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
54 reviews
- 4%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 48%Every six months
- 37%Every two months or less
54 reviews
- 6.3
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.6
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers- Auto"Beautiful phone with a curved design and comfortable even for medium-small hands, fast charging, but fragile and with microphone problems.
The phone is very beautiful and has a curved design that feels really good in the hand. It's easy to hold, even for those with medium to small hands. However, it's a somewhat fragile device, especially the included cover and the buttons, which don't feel very sturdy. The screen is excellent and offers really good visual quality. Charging is very fast, a major plus. On the other hand, it has serious issues with the microphone: during calls, you often get nothing, and my friends struggle to hear me. It also tends to get hot from time to time, although this doesn't happen too often.
Pros- design
- screen
- drums
- very fast charging
- excellent ergonomics
Cons- microphone
- cover (included)
- general fragility
- delicate buttons
View original review- 7.5
- Screen6.3
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - Autogood, nice, and cheap
A very good phone for its price-quality ratio. Its flaws are quite pronounced: it's very fragile, has a short battery life (though fast charging compensates for this), and suffers from overheating. Its strengths are also very pronounced: the design, a very good screen, and a camera that rivals any other phone. After two years of use and soon to be replaced, I can say that I'm very happy with it. I'm only replacing it because I want to or because it failed me, but more because the screen is cracked, and I'm treating myself to a little upgrade (to the Edge 60 Pro; I'm not abandoning this generation because I absolutely love it). I highly recommend this phone, which might be the first one I'll be sad to part with.
Pros- Design
- Fast Charging
- Screen
- Camera
- Software
Cons- Fragile
- Low battery
- Overheating
View original review- 8
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- Auto3B
If you use the camera and know how to use pro mode, you get spectacular photos, and it has more audio codecs than newer devices, which makes it worthwhile if you're an audiophile.
Pros- Audio codecs
- Pro mode camera
- Pro Mode Video
- Battery
- Performance
- Refresh rate 144Hz
Cons- Full brightness
- Selfie
- Camera in Normal Mode
- It gets hot when it's under a lot of strain, but it doesn't get hot.
View original review- 10
- Screen9.2
- Performance10
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Operating System 5 months ago
- Features 1 year ago
- SIM card 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Name, RAM 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- On Sale, Aliases 2 years ago
Score
- 7.8 Design & Materials
- 6.7 Performance & Hardware
- 7.5 Camera
- 8.1 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
