you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola G85 reviews by real users Motorola G85
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.1
- Pros
- Battery
- Display quality
Cons- Updates
- Video quality
- Price
- Slow SOC
- 6.67"pOLEDFHD+20:9
- 171 g73.1 mm161.9 mm7.6 mm
- SnapD. 6s Gen3 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 475.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 30 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 21
- 4
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.6
- Performance8.2
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a very balanced smartphone with excellent value for money. They highlight its premium design and fluidity for daily use, although some find it somewhat overrated due to its curved screen.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz curved pOLED screen is magnificent, with vivid colors and great brightness, ideal for multimedia. Its durability stands out.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and not very demanding games. The processor might fall short in demanding titles.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is good for daytime photos and selfies. However, it struggles in low light and lacks 4K recording.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 4G/5G and Wi-Fi connectivity is good, with NFC. However, the microphone is a weak point and it lacks an audio jack.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers good autonomy. The 33W fast charging is decent, although its duration varies with demanding use.
- 0%Less than half day
- 12%Less than a day
- 35%One day
- 46%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
26 reviews
Software
- 31%It comes with a clean operating system
- 65%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 4%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
26 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 63%Every six months
- 37%Every two months or less
26 reviews
- AutoGood device
It runs smoothly in daily use, and games like Free Fire, COD, and PUDG run well. However, if it gets hot, the device can overheat; a cooler is recommended, or playing at night.
Pros- Processor
- Screen
- Battery life
- Cameras
Cons- It does not offer good protection against water
View original review- 8.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe Moto G85 5G is an excellent smartphone.
Excellent smartphone, I've been using it for 6 months and I have to say that it takes beautiful photos, light software even if the updates arrive with a lot of delay, then the 4G reception is excellent and even 5G, the Wi-Fi takes well with good speeds, in general I'm happy with it but Motorola needs to do more in terms of patch updates.
Pros- Reception
- Drums
- Price
- Lightweight software
Cons- Updates via OTA
- Camera software
View original review- 8.5
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoExcellent device
This phone is great, perfect for gaming, and its 16GB of RAM (with RAM Boost) makes it fantastic. It's incredibly smooth with its 120Hz refresh rate. The camera could be better, but it's still very good. The operating system is almost clean. For the price, I'd definitely buy it! Especially since it comes with a charger and a case!
Pros- Gaming performance
Cons- They don't promise many Android updates (typical of Motorola)
View original review- 9.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera8.6
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoReliable and comfortable
It's a phone with a pretty nice design. The curved pOLED screen makes watching content a real pleasure, thanks to its good image quality and vibrant colors. In terms of durability (in my personal experience), it's survived several hard drops, and the screen is still intact (which surprises me for a curved screen). The IP54 rating is also a plus. The camera is good, especially the main one, and it has very good image resolution in daylight. Where it falls short is in nighttime resolution, and the same goes for the selfie camera. It also doesn't record in 4K, which is a drawback. The battery life is also good; it's not excellent, but it's perfectly adequate. The fast charging is also decent, considering it's only 33W. And finally, in terms of performance, I think it's fine. I've been able to play several games without any problems, although some don't support the highest quality. To get good performance from the phone (+60 FPS), it's recommended to have the settings for demanding games at medium resolution, or if you set them to high depending on the game, you can also reach 60 FPS.
Pros- Screen
- Design
- Performance
- Endurance
- Price
Cons- Microphone
- It does not record in 4K
- The night vision camera falls short
View original review- 8.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - 9.6
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- AutoThe best curved LED display for under $200 with 1600 nits of brightness
It looks like a high-end device with great attention to detail and construction. The sound is exquisite, much better than others in its price range with Dolby Atmos. It's excellent for multimedia, watching videos, and listening to music. Its screen, design, and audio are unrivaled in its range. With Smart Connect, you can enjoy your content on external screens. The battery and autonomy are very good; it outperforms Xiaomi and Samsung. It has acceptable fast charging in its price range, better than Samsung and rivals Xiaomi. The RAM is poor; it's LPDR4, not LPDR4x. The truth is that sometimes it struggles with multitasking and restarts apps. The processor is good, not the worst; it's below the A35, but above the Redmi Note 13 in performance. It falls a bit short in camera quality; the photos are good on its main camera, they deliver and are decent, but if you're a photography lover, it's lacking. I came from a Poco x3 NFC, and it rivals that one, even though it's a fairly old device. I'd venture to say that Poco's phone boasts slightly greater sharpness in its shots and better highlight control and dynamic range than the Moto G85. It rivals the A35 in cameras but doesn't record 4k, only 1080p. It has a very good selfie camera, superior to the Xiaomi phone. In this price range, the Redmi Note 13 has no rival, being far superior to Motorola and Samsung, except for selfie photos. The camera software is basic. OS customization is average, although they have improved compared to previous generations. The camera software is lacking compared to Xiaomi, Samsung, Vivo, Opoo Pixel, and Apple. The truth is, I prefer more customization options like those offered by Samsung and Xiaomi. Motorola doesn't have a gallery...
Xiaomi and Samsung have their own editors, and we can't rely on Google Photos' editor all the time, as it limits many of its features to those that can only be used while connected to the internet. It's good, but it's not for me.Pros- Curved POLED display
- 1600 nits of brightness
- Dolby Atmos sound
- Construction and design.
- Smart connect
Cons- The camera falls a bit short
- LPDR4 RAM
- Software with little customization.
View original review- 8.4
- Screen8.7
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Image gallery 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Aliases 2 years ago
- Weight, Market, Camera, Camera, SIM card 2 years ago
- Sensor Model 2 years ago
Score
- 8.4 Design & Materials
- 6.6 Performance & Hardware
- 7.1 Camera
- 7.5 Connectivity
- 6.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
