you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G20 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G20
- 6.5"TFT LCD (IPS)HD+20:9
- 200 g75.7 mm165.2 mm9.2 mm
- Unisoc T700 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v8 142.150
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.7 234SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android 11
User score
- 10
- 6
- 4
- 3
- 3
- Screen7.4
- Performance7.7
- Camera7.1
- Connectivity7.9
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Performance & Hardware
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Camera
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Connectivity
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 23%Less than a day
- 23%One day
- 46%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
26 reviews
Software
- 12%It comes with a clean operating system
- 81%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 8%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
26 reviews
- 19%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 52%Every six months
- 29%Every two months or less
26 reviews
User reviews
- AutoAcceptable, Quality-Price
It is an acceptable cell phone for its cheap price of a Low Range, the RAM is useful for me on a daily basis and its storage is bad, the battery is durable and that
Pros- Battery
- RAM
- Price quality
- Fast 4G
Cons- RAM for demanding things
- Bad processor
- Mall storage
- bad screen
View original review- 5.4
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIn my case it was good
I bought it for 20 thousand Argentine pesos in January 2024 with one dollar at 1100, I think it was one of the best purchases I made, it is the 128GB version, everything works fine.
Pros- battery
- multitask
- fluidity everyday use
- the system takes up little space
Cons- processor
- shine under the sun
- little customization
View original review- 6.9
- Screen6.2
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoWhat it offers is acceptable for its price
I think that in terms of performance the phone works well with social networks and games that are not demanding but in heavy games like geinshim impact you have to lower the graphic quality a lot and sometimes it has lags although not so often so in this section I am pleased The camera I like the selfies, the main one is acceptable, it doesn't impress and at night you can notice that the quality drops considerably, the same as for the recording, it has night vision but I don't see that it improves much, it has artificial stabilization. As for the battery, I am a user. demanding I spend a lot of time on the phone but it still suffers from many hours although the charging is something that disappoints The software section is something that I honestly did not like there is no variety of customization it is very limited and I have not received any software update except for the ones from the play store Its screen has a very basic resolution the only good thing is the 90 Hz the sound is powerful something I like but it is basic I can say that it is resistant I dropped it from a motorcycle and even so its design has not been damaged It is not the most innovative but it is acceptable
View original review- 7
- Screen4.2
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt is a very versatile phone
When I bought this cell phone I had very little money and I really do NOT regret buying it, it met all the demands that I put on it, in demanding games it works relatively well (in the vast majority), in social media applications it does not cause me problems, the cameras are good with good lighting conditions, very resistant to falls, the screen Mmm is good but I would choose a cell phone with an Amoled screen, the only detail that the phone has is the customization, god how I HATED it, you can't change the icons, very few widgets, the notification bar cannot be customized, you cannot change the color of the icons, this topic seems very bad to me since there are much older cell phones that can do these things and even from the same brand, The sound is quite good and the weight makes it feel like I'm carrying a brick.
Pros- Cameras (good condition)
- Performance
- Battery
- Design
- Drop resistant
Cons- Personalization
- Weight
- Lack of updates
View original review- 7.9
- Screen7.0
- Performance9.6
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - Autoit's very basic
It is a nice smartphone but... Its software with Android 11 is very poorly optimized in some cases it gets stuck (I must say that it will not happen often but it will happen and it is annoying) Its screen is fine although the colors saturate It has 90Hz update is the only thing what is "new" so to speak The main cameras are good (yes, in good light conditions) The wide angle leaves much to be desired in all light conditions) The macro is ornamental (at least in my case I use it in rarely and/or never) The front camera is good in the best conditions Performance is good but, as I said before, the software spoils it (that is, it will look fluid but sometimes it gets stuck) The autonomy seems good to me, it will perform well In my opinion it is a smartphone for normal use It is a Motorola phone it has the characteristic gestures of the brand but it lacks "The essence of Motorola"
Pros- The main camera in good light conditions
- Battery
- 90Hz refresh rate
Cons- Software
- The wide angle and macro are ornament
- It does not have NFC
View original review- 6.2
- Screen6.5
- Performance7.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoI bought it on its presentation date because I'm a fan of Motorola but this time I'm disappointed
The processor does not even run like Google, the cameras are not bad but they are not surprising, the screen is bad but it saves 90 hours, the 5000 mAh battery due to the processor does not last long, I do not recommend it
Pros- Design
Cons- All
View original review- 1.5
- Screen7.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 5
- Screen5.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Name, Storage 2 years ago
- Market 2 years ago
Score
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 5.8 Camera
- 6.7 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.