you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Motorola Moto G22
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 185 g74.9 mm163.9 mm8.5 mm
- Helio G37 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 159.800
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 S5KJN1 234SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- 2
- 1
- 6
- 1
- 2
- Screen6.4
- Performance4.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Performance & Hardware
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Camera
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Connectivity
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Battery
- 9%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 55%One day
- 27%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
12 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 17%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
12 reviews
- 9%Never
- 18%Once a year
- 64%Every six months
- 9%Every two months or less
12 reviews
User reviews
- AutoI'm really disappointed...
I write from this same cell phone, it is a cell phone that they gave me a year ago and when it was given as a gift I had nothing to do but use it, but my moto e7 plus (cell phone before this one) was better in all aspects, and over time I realized how underperforming this cell phone is in all aspects personally, if you have many applications or play games (not necessarily demanding because even in subway surf it stuck) it is not recommended... it even got stuck to open the camera, it's too slow...
Pros- camera
- battery
Cons- performance
- screen
- speed
- screen brightness
- sound
View original review- 3.5
- Screen4.0
- Performance2.0
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoA good cell phone but with its things
I acquired the cell phone in June 2023, it has constantly received updates, in daily use it is good, fluid and works for my needs. In gaming, in the little that I have used it, it defends itself well with games like cod mobile. It holds up to low graphics with a high fps rate. The camera is of good quality although preferably the photos will look better during the day. The bad thing is the screen, especially the brightness that in the sun you cannot see the screen at all even if it has the brightness at 100. In summary: It is a decent and good cell phone for daily use, although I do not recommend it for gaming, It is more for daily use and social networks.
Pros- Camera
- Storage
- Recurring updates
- Screen
Cons- Brightness of the screen
- night photos
- You can't see the sun
View original review- 7
- Screen5.6
- Performance6.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity6.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood for the life of an adult, for a young person who likes games not
When they bought it for me it was good it's its time, currently it doesn't run demanding games only if it is at the minimum quality it even gets stuck, THE VERY BAD THING IS THE PROCESSOR for today's games emm it doesn't work even if it is at the minimum quality . This cell phone is more for the life of an adult.
Pros- Camera
- selfie
- Screen
- Fast charge
Cons- Processor
- It's slow in common apps
- night camera
View original review- 6
- Screen7.0
- Performance5.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - Autosince I saw in abcdin it didn't suit me much :<
Its attractive design, the screen looks bad in the sun, the performance and fluidity screw up there because if you know what the low-end ones are like: the camera is very good and at night it looks bad, the connectivity is no idea because it only I saw it locally xd but I don't recommend it because I'm a gamer and I don't like lags and bugs when I play (especially what I worry about are emulators)
Pros- camera
- design
Cons- bad at games
- the bad screen
- photos nights
View original review- 5
- Screen7.7
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.3
View answers - AutoRecommended functional and beautiful elegant design
Personally, I found it super beautiful and elegant since it has a 6.5 screen for me, this is a functional phone I also have a Samsung A52, the truth is they are very beautiful, of course they are different phones but the battery lasts very well for both almost 2 days is a lie, what I have seen lasts a short time, it has a lot to do with the light connection that you have in your house, for example, if your house has plugs that are already a bit old, worn out, if it affects your battery, I have checked it and b that that oswa get stuck is something normal with the apps, photos, cookies, etc. Do not belittle this beautiful and elegant phone because it is cheaper than others, that for me counts because mebda good service, do not criticize Motorola if what you are looking for is fashion, do not give it ask me for anything A 52 believe me of course if you want it for games it's better to eat games and not a phone
View original review- 9.8
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera10
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery10
View answers - AutoMisleading
A smartphone that seems acceptable, but when reviewing the details many design errors come to light. The low power of the low-end Mediatek Helio G37 chip does not go well with components that seek to be mid-range, such as cameras, internal storage or RAM, nor with other aspects such as the most modern operating system. The obsolescence of the technologies and internal components of the SoC (GPU and CPU) lead to several optimization problems with the most modern software (Android 12). To put it in football terms: Present the Moto G22 as a mid-range (at least in certain specifications and for aesthetics) is like taking a 50-year-old average guy, giving him a good haircut, dyeing, makeup, and putting him to compete on the court with athletic 30-year-olds. Even Eber Ludueña takes him for a walk
Pros- Battery: Good capacity battery (5000mha) with a fast charging speed of 15W which is acceptable for the range.
- Storage. 128Gb internal plus slot for sd
- Aesthetics: Nice and good build quality
Cons- Main error: low-end internal SoC (Madiatek)
- CPU: Lacks hybrid architecture (BIG.little)
- GPU: Designed in 2014, today it is obsolete
- Cam: Good, but below the competition
- Software: Errors in the interface and programs
- Software 2: Lack of fluidity in the interface
View original review- 4.8
- Screen6.6
- Performance3.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoCell very slow, the processor is too slow I bought it recently
It's not even half full of storage yet and it's already overheating and lag problems, it's not running smoothly, it's a low-use cell phone only for calls, facebook and wsp, for games or slightly heavy apks it won't work well,
View original review- 1.8
- Screen8.7
- Performance3.0
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 10 days ago
- Sensor Model, Features 11 months ago
- Fast charge 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Market 1 year ago
- Storage 1 year ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Operating System, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
Score
- 5.3 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 6.1 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.