User score

Overall satisfaction
  • 2
  • 1
  • 6
  • 1
  • 2
12 reviews
  • Screen6.4
  • Performance4.6
  • Camera6.0
  • Connectivity7.0
  • Battery7.2
Want to comment on the Motorola Moto G22?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?

12 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?

12 reviews

Is it comfortable?

12 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?

12 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?

12 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?

12 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?

12 reviews


Quality of daytime photos

12 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos

12 reviews

Quality of selfies

12 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?

12 reviews


Does it have good coverage for calls?

12 reviews

Quality of the GPS

12 reviews

And the WiFi?

12 reviews


How long does the battery last?
  • 9%
    Less than half day
  • 0%
    Less than a day
  • 55%
    One day
  • 27%
    More than one day
  • 9%
    Two days or more

12 reviews


Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 0%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 83%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 17%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

12 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 9%
  • 18%
    Once a year
  • 64%
    Every six months
  • 9%
    Every two months or less

12 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Auto
    I'm really disappointed...

    I write from this same cell phone, it is a cell phone that they gave me a year ago and when it was given as a gift I had nothing to do but use it, but my moto e7 plus (cell phone before this one) was better in all aspects, and over time I realized how underperforming this cell phone is in all aspects personally, if you have many applications or play games (not necessarily demanding because even in subway surf it stuck) it is not recommended... it even got stuck to open the camera, it's too slow...

    • camera
    • battery
    • performance
    • screen
    • speed
    • screen brightness
    • sound
    • 3.5
    • Screen4.0
    • Performance2.0
    • Camera4.5
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Nice phone. But on the screen it looks poor.

    • Battery
    • Performance
    • Screen
    • Photos
    • 5.2
    • Screen5.7
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera5.7
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    A good cell phone but with its things

    I acquired the cell phone in June 2023, it has constantly received updates, in daily use it is good, fluid and works for my needs. In gaming, in the little that I have used it, it defends itself well with games like cod mobile. It holds up to low graphics with a high fps rate. The camera is of good quality although preferably the photos will look better during the day. The bad thing is the screen, especially the brightness that in the sun you cannot see the screen at all even if it has the brightness at 100. In summary: It is a decent and good cell phone for daily use, although I do not recommend it for gaming, It is more for daily use and social networks.

    • Camera
    • Storage
    • Recurring updates
    • Screen
    • Brightness of the screen
    • night photos
    • You can't see the sun
    • 7
    • Screen5.6
    • Performance6.3
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity6.5
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Good for the life of an adult, for a young person who likes games not

    When they bought it for me it was good it's its time, currently it doesn't run demanding games only if it is at the minimum quality it even gets stuck, THE VERY BAD THING IS THE PROCESSOR for today's games emm it doesn't work even if it is at the minimum quality . This cell phone is more for the life of an adult.

    • Camera
    • selfie
    • Screen
    • Fast charge
    • Processor
    • It's slow in common apps
    • night camera
    • 6
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance5.0
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Cell phone is a fool, it's beautiful but comes with a horrible processor

    • 5
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance3.6
    • Camera5.2
    • Connectivity7.6
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    since I saw in abcdin it didn't suit me much :<

    Its attractive design, the screen looks bad in the sun, the performance and fluidity screw up there because if you know what the low-end ones are like: the camera is very good and at night it looks bad, the connectivity is no idea because it only I saw it locally xd but I don't recommend it because I'm a gamer and I don't like lags and bugs when I play (especially what I worry about are emulators)

    • camera
    • design
    • bad at games
    • the bad screen
    • photos nights
    • 5
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance4.3
    • Camera5.3
  • Auto


    • 1.1
    • Screen4.0
    • Performance2.3
    • Camera2.7
    • Connectivity2.6
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Recommended functional and beautiful elegant design

    Personally, I found it super beautiful and elegant since it has a 6.5 screen for me, this is a functional phone I also have a Samsung A52, the truth is they are very beautiful, of course they are different phones but the battery lasts very well for both almost 2 days is a lie, what I have seen lasts a short time, it has a lot to do with the light connection that you have in your house, for example, if your house has plugs that are already a bit old, worn out, if it affects your battery, I have checked it and b that that oswa get stuck is something normal with the apps, photos, cookies, etc. Do not belittle this beautiful and elegant phone because it is cheaper than others, that for me counts because mebda good service, do not criticize Motorola if what you are looking for is fashion, do not give it ask me for anything A 52 believe me of course if you want it for games it's better to eat games and not a phone

    • 9.8
    • Screen8.2
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera10
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery10
  • Auto

    A smartphone that seems acceptable, but when reviewing the details many design errors come to light. The low power of the low-end Mediatek Helio G37 chip does not go well with components that seek to be mid-range, such as cameras, internal storage or RAM, nor with other aspects such as the most modern operating system. The obsolescence of the technologies and internal components of the SoC (GPU and CPU) lead to several optimization problems with the most modern software (Android 12). To put it in football terms: Present the Moto G22 as a mid-range (at least in certain specifications and for aesthetics) is like taking a 50-year-old average guy, giving him a good haircut, dyeing, makeup, and putting him to compete on the court with athletic 30-year-olds. Even Eber Ludueña takes him for a walk

    • Battery: Good capacity battery (5000mha) with a fast charging speed of 15W which is acceptable for the range.
    • Storage. 128Gb internal plus slot for sd
    • Aesthetics: Nice and good build quality
    • Main error: low-end internal SoC (Madiatek)
    • CPU: Lacks hybrid architecture (BIG.little)
    • GPU: Designed in 2014, today it is obsolete
    • Cam: Good, but below the competition
    • Software: Errors in the interface and programs
    • Software 2: Lack of fluidity in the interface
    • 4.8
    • Screen6.6
    • Performance3.6
    • Camera6.7
    • Connectivity6.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Cell very slow, the processor is too slow I bought it recently

    It's not even half full of storage yet and it's already overheating and lag problems, it's not running smoothly, it's a low-use cell phone only for calls, facebook and wsp, for games or slightly heavy apks it won't work well,

    • 1.8
    • Screen8.7
    • Performance3.0
    • Camera8.5
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
November 22, 2023
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 10 days ago
  • Sensor Model, Features 11 months ago
  • Fast charge 1 year ago
  • Version 1 year ago
  • Name, Market 1 year ago
  • Storage 1 year ago
  • Usable surface, Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
  • Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Operating System, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
Ki Cost-effective
  • 5.3 Design & Materials
  • 5.7 Performance & Hardware
  • 6.1 Camera
  • 6.1 Connectivity
  • 6.9 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.