6.0

Lenovo Moto G5 reviews by real users Lenovo Moto G5

User reviews

User score

6.9
  • 22
  • 25
  • 14
  • 3
  • 3
67 reviews
  • Screen6.8
  • Performance6.3
  • Camera6.7
  • Connectivity7.9
  • Battery5.7
Do you want to share your opinion?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.2

67 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
6.2

67 reviews

Is it comfortable?
7.8

67 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
6.1

67 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
6.3

67 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
7.0

67 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
5.7

67 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
7.6

67 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
5.2

67 reviews

Quality of selfies
6.6

67 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
7.5

67 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
8.1

67 reviews

Quality of the GPS
7.8

67 reviews

And the WiFi?
7.9

67 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 11%
    Less than half day
  • 41%
    Less than a day
  • 38%
    One day
  • 11%
    More than one day
  • 0%
    Two days or more

67 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 36%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 57%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 7%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

67 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 14%
    Never
  • 21%
    Once a year
  • 48%
    Every six months
  • 17%
    Every two months or less

67 reviews

View more

All 67 opinions

  • pretty nice phone specially compared to the price .it's like the best phone in market .i got the phone with 150$

    the ram management needs improvement .and battery life is fine but not that good.5/6 hours average /60-70% brightness.

    • 9.6
    • Screen9.0
    • Performance9.0
    • Camera9.3
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    It was good in its time, but now it's outdated.

    I had it for a year; before that it was good for games and whatever, but other than that it was almost all bad.

    Pros
    • Performance (at the time)
    Cons
    • Cameras
    • Screen
    • Sound
    • Fragile phone
    • 5.9
    • Screen3.2
    • Performance5.0
    • Camera2.5
    • Connectivity4.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    comfortable and simple

    Pros
    • comfortable
    • clean system
    Cons
    • performance
    • insufficient battery
    • 5.3
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    The classic Moto G

    In general, it is a good device, it is noticeable that after a short time of use it starts to present some hiccups and slowness in simple tasks such as opening the camera. It is a device that works well, however, age has caught up with it, while it is good at its tasks, it presents some problems that are simple and that should not happen.

    Pros
    • Cameras
    • Battery
    • Sound
    Cons
    • Performance
    • Memory
    • 7.5
    • Screen8.0
    • Performance6.3
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    If you want a quality-price cell phone, this is the one

    • 8.6
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera8.5
    • Connectivity10
  • Auto
    It's ok but nothing special

    The cell phone is already 7 years old, but it was my first cell phone from 2017 to 2019 and it was enough for that. I played a lot of Brawl Stars back then, there were only a few stutters, but today I couldn't play the game anymore because even my current Moto G8 Power can only just manage this game. I hardly used the camera.

    Pros
    • Fingerprint sensor
    • speakers are ok
    • the system does not take up any space
    • price
    • Startup sound
    • Moto action gestures
    Cons
    • processor
    • display brightness
    • almost 7 years old
    • 6.9
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance4.6
    • Camera5.0
    • Connectivity5.5
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Phone that meets the basics at a very low price

    If you only want a phone that works for the basics and normal games without being too demanding, it can meet and being a small phone today can be comfortable.

    • 6.6
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera6.2
    • Connectivity7.6
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    It was good, but it had to be imported to Brazil

    Pros
    • Performance
    Cons
    • Drums
    • 7.9
    • Screen8.7
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera7.7
    • Connectivity6.6
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    It is still very good, it has a good processor and gpu for its time in the market

    Pros
    • Screen
    • IP67
    • Processor
    • GPU
    • Footprint on the front
    • Fairly accessible
    Cons
    • Battery
    • Cameras
    • Sound
    • Materials
    • 7.8
    • Screen6.2
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera6.2
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Intermediate cell down

    • 5.7
    • Screen5.2
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera6.7
    • Connectivity5.6
    • Battery0.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
March 3, 2026
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 7 months ago
  • Features 2 years ago
6.0
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 5.5 Design & Materials
  • 5.2 Performance & Hardware
  • 5.3 Camera
  • 5.5 Connectivity
  • 5.2 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.