you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G53 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G53
- 6.52"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 183 g74.7 mm162.7 mm8.2 mm
- SnapD. 480 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v9 319.946
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 S5KJN1 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 7
- 7
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.4
- Performance7.9
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.9
- Battery8.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Performance & Hardware
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Camera
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Connectivity
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 13%One day
- 60%More than one day
- 20%Two days or more
15 reviews
Software
- 40%It comes with a clean operating system
- 60%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
15 reviews
- 8%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 67%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
15 reviews
User reviews
- AutoGood phone to buy in 2024
Well, this phone is not one of the best in its range but it is one of the cheapest that already includes support for 5G networks, everything is good, except the screen quality and its resistance to bumps and falls, if you don't have that much budget To buy a cell phone that is good and cheap, I recommend this terminal.
Pros- Dolby Atmos
- Battery
- Design
- Processor
- Fast charge
Cons- Horrible screen
- Night photo quality
- Poor resistance to knocks and falls
View original review- 7.3
- Screen6.7
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe best Low Mid Range
A mobile that is Ok It has an HD Plus screen but the rest is very complete, its processor the Snapdragon 480 Plus is better than the Snapdragon 680 with a better graphics card and it has 5g, it has a nice design, good cameras, a battery that lasts all day without load it and it has almost pure Android like the Google Pixel but with the gestures which is what I love about the Motorola and the system does not consume much RAM which helps a lot in basic tasks and in games also the optimization of the system helps a lot in fin is highly recommended nowadays it is very worth it
Pros- Very nice and eye-catching design
- Very good processor for games
- Cameras that comply
- UFS 2.2 or 2.1 storage
- 8 LDPRR4X RAM and 120 Hertz
- Pure Android like the Google Pixel
Cons- HD Plus Screen
- Load of 10 whats but it may vary
- Does not have wide angle
View original review- 10
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood phone for non-use
If you are looking for a phone for rough use this will not be an option, its processor, screen and camera are "normal" and do not stand out much although it is a very good phone for ordinary people.
Pros- Rear camera
- Processor
- Storage
- Common Application Performance
Cons- Frontal camera
- Screen
- Heavy application performance
View original review- 7.2
- Screen7.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.2
- Screen6.5
- Performance7.6
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- Autogood and decent
It has a very bad HD screen, which is the worst point, even though it has 120hz, decent quality audio, it has good volume but it distorts if you turn it up to the maximum, although it is not asymmetrical since the bottom speaker is the one that sounds the best and the top one is As a reinforcement, it has an extremely good battery life, 12 hours of active screen without problem and playing, but the fast charging is terrible, almost 2 hours to fill the battery for 1 hour and 50 minutes, the rear camera is decent during the day, at night it suffers quite a few, selfies are bad day or night, it's not their strong suit, performance is good but there is lag in the interface, when writing you feel a slight delay, in games it works decent despite having an SD480+ and a Adreno 619 but if they have lag and jerks from time to time, especially when they demand a little more, slight heating within the normal range without going overboard, it is a good low range.
Pros- Battery
- Audio
- Processor and GPU
Cons- Loading time
- Cameras
- Screen resolution
- Performance
- Delay when writing
View original review- 5.9
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 14 days ago
- RAM 2 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Aliases, Market, SIM card, SIM card 1 year ago
- Usable surface 1 year ago
- AnTuTu, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Resolution, Resolution, Density, Operating System, Resolution 1 year ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.4 Design & Materials
- 6.5 Performance & Hardware
- 5.9 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 7.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.