you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Moto G60S reviews by real users Motorola Moto G60S
- 6.8"LCD IPSFHD+20:9
- 212 g75.9 mm169.7 mm9.6 mm
- Helio G95 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 406.422 v10
- 5000 mAh 50 W
- 1 64 Mpx ƒ/1.7 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User reviews
User score
- 29
- 10
- 4
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.2
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.9
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Performance & Hardware
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Camera
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Connectivity
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Battery
- 2%Less than half day
- 19%Less than a day
- 28%One day
- 47%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
43 reviews
Software
- 26%It comes with a clean operating system
- 74%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
43 reviews
- 19%Never
- 17%Once a year
- 56%Every six months
- 8%Every two months or less
43 reviews
- AutoPretty good value for the price
For the price I got it for, it's very good. The screen is decent, the brightness is a bit low, and the brightness distribution across the screen is somewhat uneven. Being an IPS panel, replacements are cheap. The battery might just last until the end of the day, but the 50W charger makes up for it. I think the rear camera is bad; the photo quality is comparable to a mid-range phone from 2016. The phone is a bit heavy; if you drop it, it'll leave a crater. The worst thing, without a doubt, is the Android 12 update; its only positive aspect was the battery life. I had problems with the touchscreen, and the overall performance was terrible. For example, CoD Mobile in Battle Royale mode struggled when a lot was happening, and don't even get me started on Siege mode, which only reached 6fps with all 16 turrets on Night 4 or 5. This, plus software responsiveness issues that worsened over time, were a major problem. The only solution I found was to downgrade to Android 11, and I haven't had any problems since. Aside from the easily degrading plastic casing, the hardware itself doesn't disappoint; it's very stable and quite robust for its size. Unfortunately, the software leaves much to be desired, and the lack of optimization results in a horrendous user experience.
Pros- Cheap FHD 120Hz IPS Screen
- 50w charger
- Processor
- NFC
Cons- Rear camera
- Heavy
- Mediocre version of Android 12
- Plastic Casing
- If it falls vertically 6-20°, goodbye screen.
- Google, as always, is giving us virtual cancer.
View original review- 9.2
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.7
- Screen7.0
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- 8
- Screen6.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoNeither bad nor good
I've been using it to play Fortnite since the end of quarantine and the truth is that at first it had good performance in everything but nowadays it will give you problems but it can be fixed with more or less performance applications.
Pros- Good coverage and operating system
Cons- The update is no longer available and remains on Android version 12.
View original review- 5.3
- Screen5.2
- Performance3.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood choice for general use.
It's sufficient for everyday use, and it's also good for the occasional game, but it's not Motorola's most powerful device. I don't think I'll ever use the dedicated assistant button. The fingerprint sensor is fast, though I would have preferred it to be located next to the power button. Although this is a common issue on Motorola devices, it has only had one major Android update.
Pros- Fluent
- Ample RAM
- Sufficient storage
- Battery
Cons- Cameras
- Updates
View original review- 7.5
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoBB, Nice and Cheap
Well it's good but it's true that for its price or a little more there are better ones, the price is anonymous since sometimes you find it at $ 100 USD or $ 120 USD or even $ 90 USD, Something I don't like is that it became obsolete in android 12, apart from the screen does not have Gorilla Glass or Panda Glass or any other protector, which makes it break easier, if you buy a glass, mica or I don't know what you call it, the screen and the mica will break, then the battery will wear out over time, by uninstalling Threads and disabling the Moto app, the battery will improve but not that much, it is good and cheap but there are better ones for its price, knowing that you are mid-low range
Pros- Processor
- Flash
- Storage
- Camera
Cons- Battery
- Android 12
- Screen
View original review- 5.5
- Screen5.2
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt's decent
For 2025 onwards, it's safe. If you're looking for good performance and find this phone cheap, I recommend it. Otherwise, the Helio G95 isn't worth it. It's already falling short today, and it shows.
Pros- Performance
- Cameras
- 120hz
- 50w charging
Cons- Overheating is hardly required
- Display technology
- Sound
- Night photos
View original review- 7
- Screen4.7
- Performance6.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood cell phone for daily use and some light games
In the first year it was good, I ran Genshin Impact at about 30 fps with drops but over time you can see the wear, the plastic back cover gets dirty easily, the camera is not good, the battery is noticeably degraded after years of use, now 3 years with it I can say that it still works for daily use and the occasional game but it gets hot even with light games up to 40°
Pros- Drums (early years)
- Screen size
- 120 Hz
Cons- It stayed on Android 12
- All its features go down after a year
- IPS LCD
- Camera
- Battery after one year
- Heating
View original review- 5.6
- Screen4.2
- Performance7.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 7 days ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
- Features 4 years ago
- Version 4 years ago
- Name, RAM 4 years ago
- Market 4 years ago
- Version 4 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.8 Design & Materials
- 5.6 Performance & Hardware
- 6.1 Camera
- 6.5 Connectivity
- 6.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
