you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Moto G75 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G75
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.1
- EfficiencyBGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Powerfull SOC
Cons- No Mini Jack
- Camera quality
- Short battery life
- Price
- 6.78"LTPS LCDFHD+20:9
- 205 g77.2 mm166.1 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 6 Gen3 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 550.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 30 W ~ 49h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 27
- 10
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.4
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone offers excellent value for money in the mid-range, highlighting its robustness and design. There's general agreement on its good initial performance and cameras, but opinions vary regarding long-term battery life and the screen.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the IPS screen offers good quality and sharpness, with 120Hz. However, some mention its resolution and lack of brightness under sunlight.
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, initial performance is very fluid for daily use and demanding games. Nevertheless, a drastic reduction in long-term performance and FPS limitations are reported.
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are a strong point, with the main camera excelling in good light and 4K recording. However, the front camera and low-light photos receive criticism.
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G connectivity and eSIM are positive points. Nevertheless, the absence of an audio jack and some network signal issues are criticized.
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery initially offers adequate autonomy, with fast charging. However, its long-term degradation and performance in games draw criticism.
- 3%Less than half day
- 14%Less than a day
- 65%One day
- 16%More than one day
- 3%Two days or more
37 reviews
Software
- 14%It comes with a clean operating system
- 86%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
37 reviews
- 0%Never
- 13%Once a year
- 53%Every six months
- 33%Every two months or less
37 reviews
- Nice budget phone
Very fast face unlock, thought side fingerprint sensor would be better- sometimes 2-3 attempts - the usual fingerprint bs. Screen is great, bright and...flat! Sold my Edge 60 because screen protectors kept peeling or lifting. Despite SD6 G3 soc the phone UI flies! I always thought this was an inferior level of chip- but I'm impressed. I bought phone as a second backup phone to my iPhone 15 - compared to the way that logs in/ authorises seamlessly and quickly there is little comparison, but as an Android backup device or as an 'ordinary' user it's just great for a budget price, and it's supported until 2030!
- 8.2
- Screen8.7
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Good phone for 190 euro in Bulgaria!
Good phone for thr price - camera, processor, display,sound. If you want phone for every day use, with military resistance... this is the phone.
Recommended.Pros- Everything
Cons- Nothing for now
- 9.7
- Screen10
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 8
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery0.0
View answers- AutoMotorola phone with good value for money
Great phone. It delivers on all fronts. Pretty good cameras! Especially the main one; excellent processor, pretty good battery, decent sound, very nice screen quality for not being AMOLED!
Pros- It offers practically everything for the price.
Cons- It lacks a bit of shine in the sun (although it's visible).
- Selfie could be better
View original review- 9
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoAverage
It's pretty good, to be honest, but over time its performance drops drastically. After two updates, its performance was terrible; this is the third update, and its performance is slightly better. A major problem is that the battery basically doesn't last for daily use, and when it drops to 2%, it becomes unusable. The Galaxy A56 has the same specifications, and its performance is infinitely better. The G75 5G only works properly for 6 to 8 months; after that, the problems start. A long-term disappointment.
Pros- The camera in daytime photos
- Initial performance
- 120Hz
Cons- Long-term performance
- Battery
- Customization
- Mediocre updates
- Repetitive design
- 1 fake camera
View original review- 6.7
- Screen6.0
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoLarge, comfortable, inexpensive, and for the price, it doesn't disappoint.
It's a large phone for the price, quite powerful, but it has one drawback: the battery. Initially, it lasts a very long time, but after about six months, the battery life starts to decline significantly. For example, at school, from 7:30 to 1:50, it ends up with only 20% battery remaining, even without much use.
Pros- It's big
- Charging and battery
- Photos taken in well-lit environments
- Price
- Quality for the price
- Water protection
Cons- Battery
- IPS LCD screen
View original review- 7.6
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 3 days ago
- Features 7 months ago
- Pros & Cons 7 months ago
- SIM card 9 months ago
- Density 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- AnTuTu, Usable surface, Selfie Camera, Photos 2 years ago
- Photos 2 years ago
Score
- 8.2 Design & Materials
- 6.5 Performance & Hardware
- 7.2 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
