you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Moto G75 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G75
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.1
- EfficiencyBGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Powerfull SOC
Cons- No Mini Jack
- Camera quality
- Short battery life
- Price
- 6.78"LTPS LCDFHD+20:9
- 205 g77.2 mm166.1 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 6 Gen3 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 550.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 30 W ~ 49h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 27
- 5
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.8
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this an excellent mid-range phone, highlighting its great value for money and a robust design with IP68 resistance. It offers smooth performance for daily use and gaming, although some find it a bit large.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the IPS screen is of very good quality, even when compared to AMOLED and 120Hz. Some note a lack of brightness under direct sunlight.
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is very good and fluid for demanding tasks and games, thanks to its processor. Some mention a 30fps limit in demanding games and initial heating.
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are very good, especially the main one, offering good quality in daytime photos and 4K recording. The front and macro cameras generate mixed opinions.
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G connectivity and eSim are positive points. However, the absence of a 3.5mm jack is criticized, and some experienced network signal issues.
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is sufficient for a day of normal use, but it drains quickly with gaming. The 30/33W fast charging is a plus.
- 0%Less than half day
- 9%Less than a day
- 69%One day
- 19%More than one day
- 3%Two days or more
32 reviews
Software
- 13%It comes with a clean operating system
- 87%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
32 reviews
- 0%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 48%Every six months
- 40%Every two months or less
32 reviews
- Nice budget phone
Very fast face unlock, thought side fingerprint sensor would be better- sometimes 2-3 attempts - the usual fingerprint bs. Screen is great, bright and...flat! Sold my Edge 60 because screen protectors kept peeling or lifting. Despite SD6 G3 soc the phone UI flies! I always thought this was an inferior level of chip- but I'm impressed. I bought phone as a second backup phone to my iPhone 15 - compared to the way that logs in/ authorises seamlessly and quickly there is little comparison, but as an Android backup device or as an 'ordinary' user it's just great for a budget price, and it's supported until 2030!
- 8.2
- Screen8.7
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Good phone for 190 euro in Bulgaria!
Good phone for thr price - camera, processor, display,sound. If you want phone for every day use, with military resistance... this is the phone.
Recommended.Pros- Everything
Cons- Nothing for now
- 9.7
- Screen10
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 7.7
- Screen6.7
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoIt's very good within its range; I push it a bit with games like PGR and Endfield, and it runs them quite well with good graphics.
For simple things like calls, messages, and social media, it's more than enough. When pushed a bit in games like PGR or Endfield, it performs quite well with medium to high graphics settings. It has good data, internet, and Bluetooth connectivity, giving me about six hours of active screen time. Even with my headphones on from 6 AM to 6 PM, it still has over 65% battery remaining. Despite being an IPS screen, it's comparable to an AMOLED; it's very sharp and has sufficient brightness. I've dropped it from heights of up to two meters without any major damage. It seemed like an excellent long-term option due to its updates and durability.
Pros- Durability, performance, connectivity, design, display
Cons- Photos in low light
View original review- 9
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoOkay, I'll keep you posted, Joaquín.
I've been using it for a few days and it's very good and comfortable, but the battery drains very quickly during games, and it also wouldn't pick up my phone's signal with Altan, more specifically it doesn't pick up the signal from the Bait network, which is a company here in Mexico.
Pros- All
Cons- The battery in games
- It does not have a system for arranging hearing aids.
- The network
View original review- 8.1
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
- Features 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 3 months ago
- SIM card 4 months ago
- Density 11 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- AnTuTu, Usable surface, Selfie Camera, Photos 1 year ago
- Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 8.4 Design & Materials
- 6.5 Performance & Hardware
- 7.1 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 7.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
