you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Moto G75 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G75
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.2
- EfficiencyBGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Powerfull SOC
Cons- No Mini Jack
- Camera quality
- Short battery life
- Price
- 6.78"LTPS LCDFHD+20:9
- 205 g77.2 mm166.1 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 6 Gen3 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 550.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 30 W ~ 49h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 27
- 8
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.4
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.9
- Battery7.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this an excellent mid-range phone, highlighting its great value for money and a robust design with IP68 resistance. It offers smooth performance for daily use and gaming, although some find it a bit large.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the IPS screen is of very good quality, even when compared to AMOLED and 120Hz. Some note a lack of brightness under direct sunlight.
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is very good and fluid for demanding tasks and games, thanks to its processor. Some mention a 30fps limit in demanding games and initial heating.
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are very good, especially the main one, offering good quality in daytime photos and 4K recording. The front and macro cameras generate mixed opinions.
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G connectivity and eSim are positive points. However, the absence of a 3.5mm jack is criticized, and some experienced network signal issues.
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is sufficient for a day of normal use, but it drains quickly with gaming. The 30/33W fast charging is a plus.
- 0%Less than half day
- 14%Less than a day
- 66%One day
- 17%More than one day
- 3%Two days or more
35 reviews
Software
- 15%It comes with a clean operating system
- 85%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
35 reviews
- 0%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 54%Every six months
- 36%Every two months or less
35 reviews
- Nice budget phone
Very fast face unlock, thought side fingerprint sensor would be better- sometimes 2-3 attempts - the usual fingerprint bs. Screen is great, bright and...flat! Sold my Edge 60 because screen protectors kept peeling or lifting. Despite SD6 G3 soc the phone UI flies! I always thought this was an inferior level of chip- but I'm impressed. I bought phone as a second backup phone to my iPhone 15 - compared to the way that logs in/ authorises seamlessly and quickly there is little comparison, but as an Android backup device or as an 'ordinary' user it's just great for a budget price, and it's supported until 2030!
- 8.2
- Screen8.7
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Good phone for 190 euro in Bulgaria!
Good phone for thr price - camera, processor, display,sound. If you want phone for every day use, with military resistance... this is the phone.
Recommended.Pros- Everything
Cons- Nothing for now
- 9.7
- Screen10
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoAverage
It's pretty good, to be honest, but over time its performance drops drastically. After two updates, its performance was terrible; this is the third update, and its performance is slightly better. A major problem is that the battery basically doesn't last for daily use, and when it drops to 2%, it becomes unusable. The Galaxy A56 has the same specifications, and its performance is infinitely better. The G75 5G only works properly for 6 to 8 months; after that, the problems start. A long-term disappointment.
Pros- The camera in daytime photos
- Initial performance
- 120Hz
Cons- Long-term performance
- Battery
- Customization
- Mediocre updates
- Repetitive design
- 1 fake camera
View original review- 6.7
- Screen6.0
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoLarge, comfortable, inexpensive, and for the price, it doesn't disappoint.
It's a large phone for the price, quite powerful, but it has one drawback: the battery. Initially, it lasts a very long time, but after about six months, the battery life starts to decline significantly. For example, at school, from 7:30 to 1:50, it ends up with only 20% battery remaining, even without much use.
Pros- It's big
- Charging and battery
- Photos taken in well-lit environments
- Price
- Quality for the price
- Water protection
Cons- Battery
- IPS LCD screen
View original review- 7.6
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.7
- Screen6.7
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoIt's very good within its range; I push it a bit with games like PGR and Endfield, and it runs them quite well with good graphics.
For simple things like calls, messages, and social media, it's more than enough. When pushed a bit in games like PGR or Endfield, it performs quite well with medium to high graphics settings. It has good data, internet, and Bluetooth connectivity, giving me about six hours of active screen time. Even with my headphones on from 6 AM to 6 PM, it still has over 65% battery remaining. Despite being an IPS screen, it's comparable to an AMOLED; it's very sharp and has sufficient brightness. I've dropped it from heights of up to two meters without any major damage. It seemed like an excellent long-term option due to its updates and durability.
Pros- Durability, performance, connectivity, design, display
Cons- Photos in low light
View original review- 9
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 12 days ago
- Features 4 months ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- SIM card 6 months ago
- Density 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- AnTuTu, Usable surface, Selfie Camera, Photos 1 year ago
- Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 8.4 Design & Materials
- 6.5 Performance & Hardware
- 7.1 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 7.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
