- 5.5"FHD75% useful16:9
- 169 g 75.0 mm 148.0 mm 10.9 mm
- SnapD. 615 Octa-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 37.289
- 3630 mAh
- 1 21 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX230 Exmor RS SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat
Note from users
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 2%Less than half day
- 11%Less than a day
- 36%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
- 47%It comes with a clean operating system
- 45%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 31%Once a year
- 43%Every six months
- 13%Every two months or less
- Great phone for everyday users, especially due to almost stock android.
It's a great phone for its price. Stock android makes it really comfortable in everyday use. Although, it can't withstand any demanding apps or games because of frequent overheating.Positives
- Almost stock android
- Good use of gestures
- Long lasting battery
- Quick charge 2.0
- Front-facing speaker
- Compromising ergonomics (thick)
- No fingerprint scanner
- Don't bother.
If you do things on your phone, other than maybe take photos and use facebook, this phone is not for you. Using more than 2 apps at the same time eats up the low RAM and the phone works extremely slow. The battery, although large on paper drains abnormally fast.Positives
- Good camera
- Clean OS
- Fast updates
- Battery time
- AutoDevice outdated
I do not recommend buying if you are a demanding user. The battery drains fast, the quality of the cameras is not good, the screen is fragile, the edges of the device peel off easily, leaving it looking horrible. The system takes too long to update.Positives
- Possibility of inserting memory card
- Both cameras
- Material quality
- Update Speed
- AutoIt was a good smartphone, I had it and it was my xodo. The battery lasted long, was top in 2015.
I always loved the camera, its battery was monster. Always rolled everything smoothly, but over time became obsolete and now wait for my Xiaomi arrive.Positives
- Anti heating system
- AutoIntermediate outdated for the present day, but still usable for less demanding users.
Screen with satisfactory quality, standard for an IPS LCD. Good shades of black (for LCD) and saturation. Viewing on strong sunlight leaves much to be desired. Satisfying performance, calmly withstands lighter gaming, yet leaves a craving in heavier, like PUBG. The construction, despite being entirely plastic, is good. The rubber-backed back provides a good grip on the hands and does not let the device slip. Initially very good battery, it lasts all day quietly, but the wear is fast and Motorola's pre-2016 handsets have a software calibration problem that causes the device to shut down even before the battery runs out or shows an inaccurate measurement of it. After 1 year and a half of use the device could not handle the end of the day with load. Sound is satisfactory, standard for an intermediate cell phone. Nothing spectacular, but it gives the message, does not distort much in mu volumesPositives
- Good screen
- Satisfactory Chambers
- Good construction
- Performance Currently
- Battery currently
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 4.8 Design & Materials
- 4.7 Performance & Hardware
- 7.4 Camera
- 5.1 Connectivity
- 6.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.