you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Oppo A17 reviews by real users Oppo A17
- 6.56"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 189 g75.6 mm164.2 mm8.3 mm
- Helio G35 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 110.000 v8
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone ColorOS 12.1 (Android 12)
User reviews
User score
- 1
- 2
- 5
- 3
- 0
- Screen6.6
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity7.2
- Battery7.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a very basic range mobile, suitable only for everyday tasks and light applications. They highlight its design, but there is a general consensus that it is not suitable for gaming. Opinions on its value for money are varied, with some considering it expensive for what it offers.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen offers good size and brightness. However, the touch response is slow and its technology is perceived as outdated.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is very limited due to a low-end processor, being terrible for gaming and experiencing slowness and overheating over time.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are a weak point. Daytime photos are acceptable, but the quality is pixelated, especially at night and with the front camera.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, the speakers offer good sound. However, Wi-Fi and the micro USB charging port are negative points, although the flash is powerful.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is durable for moderate daily use. However, some users consider it deficient.
- 0%Less than half day
- 27%Less than a day
- 36%One day
- 36%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 9%It comes with a clean operating system
- 73%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 18%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 9%Never
- 9%Once a year
- 73%Every six months
- 9%Every two months or less
11 reviews
- AutoFor gaming, I wouldn't recommend it to my worst enemy.
For everyday use (just for WhatsApp and other light apps), it's adequate. But I recommend not buying it in 2026.
Pros- Design
- Screen size
- Crack resistance
- Biometric reader
- system
- Battery
Cons- Updates
- Camera
- Performance
- Protection against risks
- Charging port
- Speakers and Wi-fi
View original review- 5
- Screen7.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - 6
- Screen8.2
- Performance3.0
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity3.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- 6.2
- Screen7.5
- Performance4.0
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoOnly the basics not recommended
It's garbage, the only thing worth mentioning is the speakers, but the rest, although it works well at first, becomes useless over time. To play, it's not even worth mentioning, it's torture to play, Roblox won't run, Minecraft with work, even light games are terrible, it has game boost but it's useless, very little storage that runs out very quickly, it even crashes with apks like Canva, bad battery.
Pros- Horn
- Update
Cons- CPU
- Storage
- RAM
- Camera
- Performance
- Memory type
View original review- 2.1
- Screen3.2
- Performance3.3
- Camera3.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood choice for internet and some apps
The phone has a good quality-price ratio. Practical for everyday use, browsing the internet and using some undemanding applications. It has good sound and good screen brightness. In conclusion, it was a good choice to give to my mother who was not used to Android.
Pros- Viewfinder
- Luminosity
- Price
- Fingerprint sensor
- Easy to use
Cons- Building materials
- Radio
- Infrared
- Photo quality
View original review- 5.7
- Screen7.5
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoA basic mobile.
*GENERAL -It is basic since its processor is not up to par with the market. -Its screen is average but not bad. -The photos are only good during the day (at night they are sad) -Good touch, the back is made of leather. -Don't plan on using it for games (seriously, NO) -Good battery, not that bad. *My honest opinion -Not even FIFA mobile runs at 30fps (WITH RECOMMENDED GRAPHICS) -It lagged after a few months (EVEN WITH MIUI IT GOES BETTER) **THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVES**
Pros- Design
- Touch
- Chambers (day)
- Battery
Cons- Processor
- Chambers (night)
- Screen technology (IPS LCD)
- Fluency
View original review- 3.5
- Screen7.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 day ago
- Features 3 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Name, Storage 3 years ago
- Market 3 years ago
Score
- 5.7 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 5.6 Camera
- 5.7 Connectivity
- 6.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
