you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Oppo A54 5G reviews by real users Oppo A54 5G
- 6.49"LTPS LCDFHD+20:9
- 190 g74.7 mm162.9 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 480 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 216.504 v9
- 5000 mAh 18 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.7 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake ColorOS 11 (Android 11)
User reviews
User score
- 4
- 1
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.7
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Performance & Hardware
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Camera
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Connectivity
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 38%More than one day
- 25%Two days or more
8 reviews
Software
- 14%It comes with a clean operating system
- 43%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 43%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
8 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 71%Every six months
- 29%Every two months or less
8 reviews
- AutoMediocre phone due to poor optimization
The phone itself doesn't have bad specs (except for the awful cameras), but the 4GB of RAM caused serious app crashes right out of the box due to ColorOS's poor optimization. And don't even get me started on the games, which were constantly stuttering. While the screen is the best IPS I've ever had on a phone and the Wi-Fi and data coverage was very good, it's definitely not recommended (especially now).
Pros- Very good IPS screen
- Wi-Fi and 5G coverage
- Good battery
Cons- Poor performance and terrible gaming performance
- Nokia 3310 Cameras
- Non-existent multitasking
- Very expensive starting price (€269)
- ColorOS is poorly optimized and heavy (20GB with nothing on it)
View original review- 4.5
- Screen8.0
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe best is the battery
It is a phone that meets for day to day but it has average errors, it makes lag, it is not horrible but it annoys at times, the sound is very good, the brightness too, the battery is super great, the litter is really ugly, in broad daylight it takes decent photos, would I buy it again, no.
View original review- 6
- Screen7.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoMy experience is neutral.
Design: The design is generally a nice design for me, except for the slightly large punch hole and "chin" at the bottom of the display. Camera: The camera takes nice, bold pictures for me (With HDR and AI scene enhancement.) Without HDR and AI scene enhancement, the pictures are rather slightly natural and a bit cool from my point of view. I think the night pictures are clear for the price range. However, these are not really very good. The selfie cam takes natural pictures where I can't complain. Battery: If I charge the battery to a good 100%, I can get through a maximum of 1 1/2 to 2 days with normal use. Display: The display is an LTPS LCD display, which has a resolution of 404 ppi. In itself it's not bad, only the brightness and black levels could be better if you look at the display from the side. My own conclusion: The Oppo a54 5g is a good entry-level cell phone, which is also worthwhile. However, the price is just a bit high. What bothers me about the phone is the LTPS LCD display and the fact that it does not have an IP (water and dust protection) certification, and is therefore not water and dust resistant. Unfortunately, it sometimes seems to me that the CPU (processor) is overwhelmed with the 90 Hertz refresh rate. At a price of 270 euros, I would have expected at least 120 Hertz, as with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 pro. And I would have expected a slightly more powerful processor there. What I find positive myself is the camera, which shoots solid pictures for me with and without AI scene enhancement and HDR during the day. The night pictures could be a little bit better for the price range, that's my expectation.But enough "mockering around". The display is nice and big, but a bit too big for my hand. The display is also bright enough for the type. If I'm right, it hits 450 to 550 nits.
Pros- day pictures
- battery/rechargeable battery
- design appealing
- Large screen
Cons- Punch hole is too big
- black levels of the display
View original review- 8.7
- Screen8.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoEconomical terminal for undemanding use
It must be clear that it is a low-mid range, for a not very demanding use it is not a bad terminal, the Battery responds well. The screen looks good as long as we are indoors. For my taste it falls short of Ram
Pros- Battery
- Cap
Cons- RAM
- Outdoor use
- Sound
View original review- 5.8
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.0
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - 9
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoGood smartphone.
It is a pleasant mobile with potential but the fact that it is 5g compatible for a lower cost requires making concessions. I recommend this product.
Pros- UI customization
- Daytime photo good for the price
- Robust battery
- Good resolution screen at 90 Hz
- CPU power
- Good reception 4g not used in 5g
Cons- The settings menu is not the best
- 128g of storage will be better
- No video in 4k
View original review- 10
- Screen9.3
- Performance10
- Camera9.3
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 days ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Name, Storage 3 years ago
- RAM 3 years ago
- Features 4 years ago
Score
- 5.9 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 6.7 Camera
- 7.9 Connectivity
- 6.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
