you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
realme GT Neo 3 reviews by real users realme GT Neo 3
- Ki Cost-effective Score8.6
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Fast charge
Cons- No Wireless charging
- No Notification Led
- No Mini Jack
- No MicroSD slot
- No FM Radio
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 188 g75.6 mm163.3 mm8.2 mm
- Dimensity 8100 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- v10 855.842
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.88 IMX766 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 13 Tiramisu RealmeUI 3.0 (Android 13)
User score
- 31
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 1
- Screen8.9
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.6
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery8.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Performance & Hardware
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Camera
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Connectivity
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 6%Less than a day
- 32%One day
- 56%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
34 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 79%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
34 reviews
- 7%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 59%Every six months
- 34%Every two months or less
34 reviews
User reviews
- Excellent mobile
Mediatek's processor dimensity 8100 is very powerful and the device performance is excellent, I am enjoying the experience. Thank you Realme
Pros- Excellent processor 8100
- Crisp screen
- Ultra fast charging 15 minutes
- Battery endurance
- Good camera main lense
Cons- Some Chinese words
- Wide angle is acceptable
- Macro is useless
- 9.6
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - Good Cost x Benefit on the cheaper model
The price is really competitive for the 80w model with bigger battery at 5000mah. Screen, Performance, Build Quality, Sound and Main Camera are quite good. Previously, I had a Mi8 old flagship phone, which is still very good and to be honest, Neo3 is just slightly better in all aspects compared to it on a day to day use. Mind you, Mi8 is 4 years old now and still a solid choice compared to that myriad of midrangers out there. Thinking better, now that I have Neo3 in hands, I could stayed a bit longer with my Mi8.
The photo quality are similar, faster on Neo3 for sure, but overall quality are similar, especially having GCAM installed on the Mi8 and working flawlessly. Honestly, I thought that the IMX766 would provide much better quality compared to Mi8 camera, but oddly, fine texture is a bit messy on that sensor, probably it needs a software processing improvement. Realme should hire the Nokia imaging team responsible for the 808 and 1020 software! GCAM is not fully optimized for Neo3 yet so I'm still on the stock camera app. Performance wise is much higher than Mi8 and screen quality are similar. Sound is better on Neo3 though.
Finally, a message for the manufacturers: I bet most of the user would prefer a killer main cam instead of those Ultrawide and Macro rubbish/gimmick we see on majority of the low/mid range phones.Pros- Display is bright.
- Main camera is good though fine texture is messy.
- Sound is well balanced.
- Superb performance.
- Really fast charge!
- Fast and fluid UI.
Cons- Ultrawide and macro cameras are useless.
- Battery endurance could be better.
- Lack of notification led.
- 9
- Screen8.2
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - Great Performance in the Smartphone
Great performance.
It fully charges in about 15min (150W)
The phone is beautiful and not heavy at all. The sound is very good. The Realme UI is beautiful and easy to use.Pros- Performance
- Fast Charging
- Beautiful phone
- Not Heavy
- Sound
- 9.6
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - It's nice... I like it
Battery not bad
Charge speed so nice
Good for game..but just good
Medium Speakers
Net conection not bad
Display is so good
LPDDR5 RAM & 5nm chipset
Optical stabilization that make it so great
Almost good phone with standard price
And the design is lovelyPros- New chipset
- LpDDR5 ram
- Fast charge 80w
- Optical stable vid
- Blutooth5.3/wifi6
- Display quality
Cons- Not 144Hz
- Chipset brand
- Selfi
- Ultra wide lens
- No jack3.5 no FM
- No game keys
- 9.4
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood for the price
Disadvantages: the design is not for everyone, if we say the back cover, PWM without DC dimming, DC dimming a year later is still an experimental function + HDR does not work correctly with it, video recording leaves questions, firstly, the work with zoom is not very good, as is the quality, in Secondly, in all the videos the image “jumps” for the first second, there is no LED indicator, huge dimensions, the glass is actually rounded on the sides - it’s difficult to glue the protective glass, the screenshot is taken on the volume down + power buttons, and quite often you can accidentally take a screenshot when you’re just adjusting sound or turn off the screen. Otherwise, everything is subjective, it works well, charging at 150W is something, although it’s hard to believe that the battery will last long. And, also, 12GB of RAM does not give anything, more than 5-6 applications are unloaded from memory, I don’t know what this amount is for.
Pros- CPU
- Charger
- Sound
- OS performance
Cons- Camera
- Dimensions
- Design
- Display
- UI work
View original review- 8.3
- Screen8.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Name, RAM 5 months ago
- Version 5 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 7 months ago
- Image gallery 1 year ago
- Pros & Cons 1 year ago
- Storage 1 year ago
- On Sale 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
Score
- 7.8 Design & Materials
- 7.9 Performance & Hardware
- 7.8 Camera
- 8.3 Connectivity
- 7.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.