you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
realme GT Neo Flash reviews by real users realme GT Neo Flash
- 6.43"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 186 g73.3 mm158.5 mm9.1 mm
- Dimensity 1200 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 699.600 v10
- 4500 mAh 65 W
- 1 64 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.3 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.5
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake RealmeUI (Android 11)
User reviews
User score
- 12
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery6.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Performance & Hardware
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Camera
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Connectivity
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Battery
- 8%Less than half day
- 17%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 25%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
12 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
12 reviews
- 0%Never
- 25%Once a year
- 67%Every six months
- 8%Every two months or less
12 reviews
- AutoExcellent phone for 19,000 rubles (8/128).
Convenient interface without lags, many settings and design. Ideal for games and normal use. Fast charging 65.0W in 40-45 minutes (after 1 year of use). Battery 4500 mAh, with active use in games is enough for 4.5-5 hours. With combined use (games / video / browser / social networks) for 16-19 hours. For simple communication, the charge lasts more than 1 day. The camera is not bad, slightly better than average. It shoots great during the day, but personally I lack saturation. The front one often turns yellow, the camera shoots well at night.
Pros- Super AMOLED display, 120Hz, FHD+, HDR10+, 5G support
- MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (Antutu 796k), 3 GHz, 6 nm
- UFS 3.1, Jack 3.5, NFC
- Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones
- Cooling system, Fast charging 65.0 W (40min)
- 4K 60fps
Cons- Fingerprint scanner
- Battery 4500 mAh
- Camera
View original review- 9.6
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 2 years ago
- Screen Type 3 years ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
