you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
realme Q3s reviews by real users realme Q3s
- 6.6"LCD IPSFHD+20:9
- 199 g75.8 mm164.4 mm8.5 mm
- SnapD. 778 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 584.400 v10
- 5000 mAh 33 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.1
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake RealmeUI 2.0 (Android 11)
User reviews
User score
- 6
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.1
- Performance9.4
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
Performance & Hardware
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
Camera
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
Connectivity
6 reviews
6 reviews
6 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 67%One day
- 33%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
6 reviews
Software
- 33%It comes with a clean operating system
- 50%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 17%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
6 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
6 reviews
- Bang for the buck phone got 6/128 variant for less than ~$200 dollars in the Philippines
Best phone under 200$(In the Philippines) phone on the upper midrange segment. Been using for the last two weeks it's very smooth felt like a flagship. The only problem is the delayed notification which I am currently facing.
Pros- High definition speaker
- Clear photos at night
- Very stable video
- Good quality LCD
- Has built in google play services
Cons- Lacks stereo
- Lacks ultra wide
- Macro is only 2mp
- Delayed notification
- China rom only
- Has bloatwares
- 9
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe phone is excellent quality. If there weren't some flaws, it would just be chic.
The design is excellent, in the hand lies as it should. A small such dissonance, only if the fingers are long sometimes you touch the rear camera. The speaker is excellent, the sound from it is loud, clear, legible. I don’t like its autonomy so much, if it were a little more at least up to one day, well, it’ll do. On average, he lives with standard loads, sit in games (1h-2) and surf the Internet, it lasts for 9-11 hours. The processor power is excellent, enough to play almost all games at max. settings. The phone is not bad, it tears everyone in its price segment, there is only one fighter, it is almost on equal terms with it POCO X3 PRO, the same games, the first half hour POCO X3 PRO is better by 5-10%, then realme Q3s breaks out into the front, and already after an hour of playing, realme Q3s will be 10-15% better than the same POCO X3 PRO. I advise you to buy a phone. Make no mistake.
Pros- Power
- good screen
- No OPS freezes
- Not a bad camera
- Convenient location of the front camera
- High quality loud speaker
Cons- Autonomy of work
- Somehow making a connection
- mono sound
View original review- 9
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoPerformance/Price 10/10
First of all I have to say that I like mobile phones with an SD reader and it is that I have my collection of games for various platforms as well as apps and others and it is essential for me to always have quick access to it even if I format the mobile everything always remains in the D. It is very powerful for its price and quite nice. I would have liked the radio, double loudspeaker, although the one it has can be heard very well. I like the way the screen looks and also with its 144 Hz it works great. The cameras are fine as well as the connectivity but nothing remarkable. I like the battery and I don't want a mobile that drops below 5000 mAh, and its 30w charge is not bad. Right now for this price there is no other better mobile and especially if you like to play with it. It cost me 190 euros. Greetings
Pros- Processor
- Battery
- Design
Cons- Not Estero
- Radio
- connectivity
View original review- 8.9
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 3 years ago
- Features 4 years ago
- Sensor Model 4 years ago
- Fast charge, Sensor Model, Camera, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 4 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.9 Design & Materials
- 6.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.9 Camera
- 5.9 Connectivity
- 6.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
