you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A01 Core reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A01 Core
- 5.3"TFT LCD (IPS)HD+19.5:9
- 150 g67.5 mm141.7 mm8.6 mm
- MT6739 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 16 GB
- v8 55.600
- 3000 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 10 Q Android 10 Go edition
User score
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 4
- 20
- Screen2.8
- Performance1.8
- Camera1.8
- Connectivity3.9
- Battery2.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Performance & Hardware
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Camera
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Connectivity
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Battery
- 54%Less than half day
- 31%Less than a day
- 12%One day
- 4%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
26 reviews
Software
- 27%It comes with a clean operating system
- 42%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 31%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
26 reviews
- 32%Never
- 23%Once a year
- 36%Every six months
- 9%Every two months or less
26 reviews
User reviews
- Not good...
This product is very insufficient and incomplete for any user since its performance is not optimal despite the fact that it is manufactured to be optimal, thus limiting many functions such as the use of applications in the background and that you only have 300MB of RAM left since the Device apps consume 600MB so the device lag is noticeable at all times, battery is bad, connectivity is bad, camera is regular, screen is bad, in conclusion I do not recommend this smartphone at all unless you are a grandmother who only uses it to make calls and send text messages.
Pros- Software
Cons- Design
- Battery
- Camera
- Screen
- RAM
- Processor
- 0.7
- Screen4.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - Auto
To begin with, the Galaxy A01 Core is a phone that is supposedly a cheap cell phone with good specifications for basic use, but upon reviewing its specifications, it leaves a lot to be desired._. like its IPS or TFT screen? With HD Plus resolution, not FHD, FHD+ and 60 Hz? Horrible MEDIAN processor here are the results
Pros- Software (Android Go)
Cons- Battery (3000mAh)
- Cameras (They are disappointing)
- Performance (Does not last well)
- Mediatek MT6739 Processor Bad Media Processor
- Graphics
- Nothing that can be rescued
View original review- 1.4
- Screen2.0
- Performance0.5
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoBad, but not the worst
Almost all wrong, although the only good thing is the GPS, but it is not 100% good either, then in performance it is a joke.
Pros- GPS
- Battery (The first days)
- It is something easy to use
Cons- Hardware
- Performance
- Signal (Not so much)
- Camera
- Your inner space of 2016
- Its volume that at least gives everything
View original review- 2.3
- Screen1.6
- Performance1.3
- Camera1.2
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoA HEREDITARY LEVEL DISASTER
NEVER IN 2023 I HAVE SEEN A CELLPHONE AS HORRIBLE AS THAT, I ALMOST GAVE AIDS IF I SEE THE DESIGN, IT IS NOT OLD, IT IS NOT WORSE THAN THE ALCATEL 1 2019 AND THE A602, IT IS NOT EVEN FOR BASIC PEOPLE, EVERYTHING REST IS SHIT AND THE HARDWARE NOT TO BE TOLD IT WAS THE WORST CELL PHONE IN THE WORLD THAT COULD ONLY BE USED TO SEND IT TO THE FREEZER
Pros- NOTHING
- Without a good cell phone, Goku will not revive
Cons- ALL
- I'm jota with no Saiyan XD
View original review- 0
- Screen0.0
- Performance0.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoThe worst cell phone ever
It is an ultra-low-end cell phone, it is NOT even suitable for basic use, the battery does not last at all, its processor is crap, it does not even run free fire and to make matters worse, it is extremely expensive for what it offers, garbage is what defines this cell phone
Pros- NOTHING
Cons- LITERALLY EVERYTHING
View original review- 0
- Screen0.0
- Performance0.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - 0
- Screen0.0
- Performance0.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery0.0
View answers- 0.1
- Screen0.5
- Performance0.3
- Camera0.2
- Connectivity1.0
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 15 days ago
Score
no Ki
- 4.8 Design & Materials
- 4.7 Performance & Hardware
- 4.7 Camera
- 5.2 Connectivity
- 4.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.