you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A03 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A03
- "Ki" Value for Money Score6.2
- Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
Cons- Camera quality
- Selfie camera
- Slow SOC
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 196 g75.9 mm164.2 mm9.1 mm
- Unisoc T606 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- 174.932 v8
- 5000 mAh 8 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User reviews
User score
- 23
- 22
- 13
- 8
- 2
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.3
- Camera5.8
- Connectivity7.4
- Battery7.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
Performance & Hardware
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
Camera
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
Connectivity
68 reviews
68 reviews
68 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 41%One day
- 37%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
68 reviews
Software
- 13%It comes with a clean operating system
- 78%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 9%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
68 reviews
- 16%Never
- 15%Once a year
- 48%Every six months
- 21%Every two months or less
68 reviews
- Объективно плохой телефон за свою цену 8700₽/100$
Антуту 140к (unisoc tiger t606)
У него правда нет плюсов, за свою цену ну просто такое себе, нет смысла брать его. Лагучий уже после даже чуть менее года, имеет камеры такие себе, дисплей неприятный и в целом его некомфортно использовать, не советую.Pros- Ну хотя бы с коробки не лагал, за это спасибо)
Cons- Плохая производительность
- Мыло-камеры
- Дискомфорт при использовании
- Некрасивый дизайн
- Цена высокая за характеристики
- ЛСД дисплей
- 3
- Screen4.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Buen celular para su gama y precio
Es un teléfono bueno para su precio, destaca la camara y batería para su gama y precio, para juegos puedo decir que regular ya que no soporta bien el free fire, pero lo demás es un buen celular por parte de samsung
Pros- Bateria
- Camara
- Software
- Procesador para lo básico
Cons- Rendimiento en juegos
- Camara frontal
- Sin lector de huellas
- 7.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - Dislikes
After 6 months of use, I can say that this phone is in some ways even worse than my old Samsung j 2016, in particular, the sensor often does not listen, which is frankly annoying, the camera is very mediocre, Samsung applications for some reason constantly load themselves, in general, I would not recommend it, look for something of higher quality with good mobilespecs, do not be fooled by the price.
- 5.3
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.1
- Screen7.6
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoIt's very good for a relatively cheap phone
The screen is good quality, and the main camera works very well for daily use, as long as you don't play demanding games because it overheats. It doesn't freeze in apps like WhatsApp, and its processor is good for the price.
Pros- Daily fluids
Cons- Processor,
View original review- 8.5
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoACCEPTABLE
I've had this phone for 3 years, and to be honest, it's not really worth it. Maybe for a very basic user or as a secondary phone for WhatsApp or calls, but not for gaming. The phone overheats, especially in games like Free Fire, Roblox, and others, or even TikTok. The screen is very poor and not the best quality. The battery life is okay; if you watch videos, it can last until the evening, but in video games (depending on the game), it can drain faster. Charging is very slow since it doesn't have fast charging and takes about 3 hours to fully charge. The cameras leave much to be desired. Daytime photos are "acceptable," but nighttime photos are very bad and not even "decent" or "acceptable." Regarding updates, it came with Android 11 and only reached Android 13 (unfortunately), and a few months ago it finally received One UI 5.1 and security patches. As for performance and the processor, it's simply bad. The phone overheats when playing games, and... It's unreliable, even in basic functions like the power button, and restarting the phone takes about 5 minutes. If you're thinking of buying this phone, DON'T BUY IT. There are better options, or save up for something that's actually good.
Pros- Battery
Cons- Cameras
- Processor
- Screen
- Burden
View original review- 4.2
- Screen5.2
- Performance3.0
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 26 days ago
- Pros & Cons 2 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Name, Storage 3 years ago
- Operating System 3 years ago
- Version, Aliases 3 years ago
- Features 4 years ago
- Market 4 years ago
- AnTuTu 4 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 4 years ago
Score
- 5.1 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 5.4 Camera
- 5.3 Connectivity
- 6.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
