you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A03 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A03
- Ki Cost-effective Score6.5
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Coverage
Cons- Camera quality
- Selfie camera
- Slow SOC
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 196 g75.9 mm164.2 mm9.1 mm
- Unisoc T606 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v8 174.932
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 2SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 16
- 11
- 3
- 2
- 1
- Screen7.3
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.9
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery8.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Performance & Hardware
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Camera
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Connectivity
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 12%Less than a day
- 27%One day
- 55%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
33 reviews
Software
- 9%It comes with a clean operating system
- 85%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 6%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
33 reviews
- 0%Never
- 3%Once a year
- 70%Every six months
- 27%Every two months or less
33 reviews
User reviews
- Buen celular para su gama y precio
Es un teléfono bueno para su precio, destaca la camara y batería para su gama y precio, para juegos puedo decir que regular ya que no soporta bien el free fire, pero lo demás es un buen celular por parte de samsung
Pros- Bateria
- Camara
- Software
- Procesador para lo básico
Cons- Rendimiento en juegos
- Camara frontal
- Sin lector de huellas
- 7.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - Dislikes
After 6 months of use, I can say that this phone is in some ways even worse than my old Samsung j 2016, in particular, the sensor often does not listen, which is frankly annoying, the camera is very mediocre, Samsung applications for some reason constantly load themselves, in general, I would not recommend it, look for something of higher quality with good mobilespecs, do not be fooled by the price.
- 5.3
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.8
- Screen4.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers- 6.5
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.3
- Camera5.6
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoThe phone is good for people who won't play games on it
In terms of daily use for people who don't worry about taking a lot of photos or playing heavy games on it, it's a great phone, now for those who play games or think that its camera is wonderful, it's a great addition, but to tinker with a social network or whatsapp etc and well it brings a pleasant performance, in this regard this phone is for people who don't spend much time in their day using the phone, in terms of value I found it a bit steep at $998. At the time I got the phone but for the price I could get something better but now nowadays it's cheaper and a cost-benefit phone which is on average $699 but in itself the phone is in the middle ground
View original review- 4.3
- Screen1.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Version, Aliases 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Market 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
Score
- 4.7 Design & Materials
- 5.5 Performance & Hardware
- 5.3 Camera
- 5.1 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.