you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A03 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A03
- "Ki" Value for Money Score6.3
- Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
Cons- Camera quality
- Selfie camera
- Slow SOC
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 196 g75.9 mm164.2 mm9.1 mm
- Unisoc T606 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- 174.932 v8
- 5000 mAh 8 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User reviews
User score
- 23
- 24
- 13
- 8
- 2
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.2
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity7.4
- Battery7.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
Performance & Hardware
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
Camera
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
Connectivity
70 reviews
70 reviews
70 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 14%Less than a day
- 41%One day
- 36%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
70 reviews
Software
- 14%It comes with a clean operating system
- 77%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 9%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
70 reviews
- 16%Never
- 14%Once a year
- 49%Every six months
- 21%Every two months or less
70 reviews
- Объективно плохой телефон за свою цену 8700₽/100$
Антуту 140к (unisoc tiger t606)
У него правда нет плюсов, за свою цену ну просто такое себе, нет смысла брать его. Лагучий уже после даже чуть менее года, имеет камеры такие себе, дисплей неприятный и в целом его некомфортно использовать, не советую.Pros- Ну хотя бы с коробки не лагал, за это спасибо)
Cons- Плохая производительность
- Мыло-камеры
- Дискомфорт при использовании
- Некрасивый дизайн
- Цена высокая за характеристики
- ЛСД дисплей
- 3
- Screen4.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Buen celular para su gama y precio
Es un teléfono bueno para su precio, destaca la camara y batería para su gama y precio, para juegos puedo decir que regular ya que no soporta bien el free fire, pero lo demás es un buen celular por parte de samsung
Pros- Bateria
- Camara
- Software
- Procesador para lo básico
Cons- Rendimiento en juegos
- Camara frontal
- Sin lector de huellas
- 7.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - Dislikes
After 6 months of use, I can say that this phone is in some ways even worse than my old Samsung j 2016, in particular, the sensor often does not listen, which is frankly annoying, the camera is very mediocre, Samsung applications for some reason constantly load themselves, in general, I would not recommend it, look for something of higher quality with good mobilespecs, do not be fooled by the price.
- 5.3
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoI would only recommend it if there were no other options.
I had it two years ago. The phone itself wasn't great for gaming, but it handled Blood Strike (when it came out) without any problems. Anything more demanding, though, and Roblox didn't run well. It was a sturdy and lightweight phone, comfortable to carry in your pocket, and it ran social apps and basic games (like Sudoku) decently. But at that price, you can't expect too much.
Pros- pocket convenience
- battery
Cons- screen
- power
- camera
- ROM memory
View original review- 6.1
- Screen5.7
- Performance4.6
- Camera3.7
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood cell phone
I've had this phone for a long time, and now I have an A36, but I still use it for basic things like watching videos, social media, and stuff like that. Performance-wise, it's not the best for moderately demanding games; the processor can sometimes be too slow. The cameras are what I like least because of the resolution, and the selfie camera makes people look yellow. The battery is good for normal use, but its charging speed isn't the best. However, since it's somewhat small, it's comfortable to carry in your hand or pocket.
Pros- Design
- Comfortable in the hand and pocket
- Flash
- Light normal use
Cons- Camera
- Screen
- Use in the sun
- Burden
- Processor
- Updates
View original review- 7
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.6
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.1
- Screen7.6
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoIt's very good for a relatively cheap phone
The screen is good quality, and the main camera works very well for daily use, as long as you don't play demanding games because it overheats. It doesn't freeze in apps like WhatsApp, and its processor is good for the price.
Pros- Daily fluids
Cons- Processor,
View original review- 8.5
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
- Pros & Cons 2 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Name, Storage 3 years ago
- Operating System 3 years ago
- Version, Aliases 4 years ago
- Features 4 years ago
- Market 4 years ago
- AnTuTu 4 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 4 years ago
Score
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 5.5 Camera
- 5.4 Connectivity
- 6.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
