you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A04 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A04
- "Ki" Value for Money ScoreNo price,
no Ki - Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
- Price
Cons- No good for gaming
- Slow SOC
- Charging Speed
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 192 g76.3 mm164.4 mm9.1 mm
- Helio P35 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 32 GB
- 124.000 v9
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 0
- 6
- 6
- 7
- 7
- Screen5.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera3.8
- Connectivity5.7
- Battery7.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone is a very basic option and, generally, not recommendable. They consider it slow and with poor performance, suitable only for extremely simple tasks like calls and messaging. Many regret their purchase and suggest looking for alternatives.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is functional for its range, although some find it acceptable and others list it as a negative point.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is the main weak point, being very slow and with constant freezes, even in basic tasks.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Camera
According to our users, opinions on the camera are varied; the 50MP main camera is decent, but most consider it to be of poor quality and slow.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, there are few mentions about connectivity, with divided opinions, without it being a remarkable aspect.
26 reviews
26 reviews
26 reviews
Battery
According to our users, battery life is one of its strong points, lasting a day of use. However, charging speed is extremely slow.
- 4%Less than half day
- 15%Less than a day
- 54%One day
- 23%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
26 reviews
Software
- 13%It comes with a clean operating system
- 67%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 21%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
26 reviews
- 13%Never
- 25%Once a year
- 38%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
26 reviews
- AutoNo games, just networks
It's a phone where the battery lasts quite well, to be honest, but the games... ugh, it's a nightmare. I only recommend it if you're not going to play demanding games. The social media is okay; TikTok sometimes freezes, but it's functional. If you're planning on playing games, don't buy it. And the camera is only good for regular photos; it's not the best, but it's passable, I suppose.
Pros- Battery
Cons- Gaming performance
View original review- 5
- Screen5.0
- Performance4.0
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 5.6
- Screen3.7
- Performance4.6
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoBy 2026, this phone will be completely useless.
When it came out, this phone was good, but nowadays it's terrible at everything. The only decent thing about it, in my opinion, is the camera, and that's it. TikTok freezes, Instagram is okay, and forget about games. If you're thinking of buying it because of the price, there are much better options. This year it's already falling far behind and it'll be a nightmare to use.
View original review- 6.1
- Screen7.0
- Performance3.3
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoTrash
I was given this phone because my old one broke. Honestly, I wouldn't recommend it at all if you're genuinely considering buying it. I only use it for music and messages, so I don't know much about its performance, but I can say that it often freezes even for those tasks. The only decent thing about it is its design. The screen isn't as bad as it looks, and sometimes you can't even tell it's HD. The only good thing about it is the front design; I'd give the back a 5 out of 10—minimalist but basic. The battery usually lasts, but the charging speed is incredibly slow. I might sound like I'm exaggerating, but I'm not. In short, it's a bad phone. Don't buy it, and don't buy any of the A0 series phones.
Pros- Design
Cons- Everything lol
- Loading speed
View original review- 4.1
- Screen3.5
- Performance1.6
- Camera1.0
- Connectivity2.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoONLY to do SIMPLE THINGS
I've been using this phone for almost three years and it's always had problems. The only thing I find useful is social media like YouTube, Instagram, Discord, and WhatsApp. Beyond that, games are incredibly laggy; I can't even play a racing game without averaging 12 FPS. Games like Clash Royale, Clash of Clans, and chess run okay with a tiny bit of lag, but Brawl Stars and Roblox are unplayable; they're incredibly laggy in every game mode, map, skin, and with all the effects. The battery is decent, though; it lasts almost a day. Charging takes two and a half hours, which is fine for me. And for the price, I'd say there are much better options. The camera is pretty bad, with blurry photos and slow, laggy recording, but that doesn't bother me since I don't take pictures anyway. I've scratched it a few times I've dropped it, just a few centimeters. It's not very noticeable, but it does affect the viewing experience and playing games. And the phone's storage is really tight; every time I install something, I have to delete something. Even so, I still love it. Don't buy this, people.
Pros- Decent battery
- Make calls
- Use it for some social networks
- Play undemanding games
- Decent battery charge of 2.5 hours
Cons- Processor
- Heavy games
- Very small space
- Take photos
- Nothing resistant
- All
View original review- 5.4
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoI didn't like it at all, I don't recommend it, it's very bad
It's a really bad phone; the storage fills up constantly, and opening any app makes the phone freeze even more, to the point where you want to break it.
Pros- Nothing
- Nothing
- Nothing
Cons- Very poor performance
- Fatal Camera
- Exist
View original review- 1
- Screen5.2
- Performance2.3
- Camera1.7
- Connectivity0.6
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoA bad, cheap and poor quality mobile phone
If you're looking for a cheap phone these days, this phone is not at all recommended. My experience with it was very poor and short. For this price, there are better ones, even cheaper ones.
Pros- Battery
- Price
Cons- Cameras
- Loading speed
- Performance
- Processor
- Connectivity
- Screen
View original review- 0.9
- Screen2.0
- Performance0.3
- Camera0.5
- Connectivity0.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoHORRIBLE PEOPLE D:
A Motorola is more worth it, horrible camera, crappy processor, buy it if you're only going to use WhatsApp or make calls, it's useless for anything else.
Pros- Makes calls
- He runs WhatsApp
Cons- It exists
- It's expensive
- Horrible photos
- Performance worse than a PS2
- All
View original review- 2
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.0
- Camera3.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 day ago
- Pros & Cons 2 years ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 3 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- AnTuTu 3 years ago
- Version, Market, SIM card, SIM card, Features 3 years ago
- Processor 3 years ago
- Similar name 3 years ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Fast charge, Photos, Photos 3 years ago
- On Sale, Aliases, Width, Height, Weight, Operating System 3 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.5 Camera
- 5.3 Connectivity
- 6.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
