you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
- 6.4"Super AMOLEDHD+20:9
- 186 g73.6 mm159.3 mm8.4 mm
- Helio G80 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v8 200.458
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 234SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 17
- 8
- 1
- 0
- 1
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.7
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.7
- Battery8.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Performance & Hardware
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Camera
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Connectivity
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 4%Less than a day
- 26%One day
- 59%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
27 reviews
Software
- 15%It comes with a clean operating system
- 81%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 4%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
27 reviews
- 0%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 44%Every six months
- 44%Every two months or less
27 reviews
User reviews
- It is not a phone that I would recommend
The design doesn't look pretty to me, although it could be a lot worse.
The mobile screen is something good, it has good angles, good colors, the 90Hz is well balanced, I doubt that more is needed, your problem is having an HD + resolution that may or may not be understood.
The main camera has a good balance, the definition is good and the colors are correct, the selfie is relatively good, good colors, the shadows are balanced, the definition is fine, perhaps against the light it leaves something to be desired and at night there is something. noise.
The stabilization in the video is fine, good colors and good shadows.
The power is fairly regular, not bad but could be a lot better.
The battery lasts well, the processor does not consume much battery, this is compensated by the amoled screen.
The connectivity is normal, in the standard for this price.
In conclusion, it is not a bad phone but for $ 225 there are better options.Pros- Camera
- Battery
- Software
Cons- HD+ Res
- Processor
- Price
- 7.8
- Screen7.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoFor everyday use only
Its AMOLED screen is not as good as they describe it, its blacks are not deep, its resolution is lousy, its pixels are visible even in dark mode, its camera is regular, its sound is bad. I would like to buy another cell phone.
Pros- Battery
- Frontal camera
Cons- Performance
- Rear camera
- Sound
- Screen (by its resolution)
View original review- 6.2
- Screen5.2
- Performance3.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Autoa good cell phone
It was good value for money, nowadays there are better ones. I use it a lot and it lasts all day in casual use, but when I play it lasts half the day. It is not so recommended to play, but I've played fortnite at about 27 fps all on low and genshin impact at about 50 fps on high, it was fine, but it warmed up and unloaded faster, so I played on medium or low. It's a good phone, but like I said, there are better ones.
Pros- Battery
- Camera
- Cheap
Cons- better screen
- better processor
View original review- 8
- Screen6.7
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoVery good mobile, recommended for basic use
The phone comes in a plastic design that feels a bit soft to the touch, the rear cameras are decent, the front is good, the battery lasts a day. If you don't use it much, the battery can last up to 2 days, the screen It is super Amoled that has a 90 hertz cup of soda, and its 90hz is smooth. Android updates are 6 months each. The sound is more or less, Hmmm the performance in basic games is going well, in high graphics it is tidy but not much. Ideal for basic use The bad thing is that it looks pixelated and the load is not very good
Pros- Screen
- Software
- Battery
- Base Gaming Performance
- fluidity of movements
Cons- pixelated screen
- 15 Watt slow charge
View original review- 9.8
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 6 days ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, RAM 1 year ago
- Fingerprint 2 years ago
Score
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 5.6 Camera
- 6.6 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.