Samsung Galaxy A22 4G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
- 6.4"Super AMOLEDHD+20:9
- 186 g73.6 mm159.3 mm8.4 mm
- Helio G80 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 200.458 v8
- 5000 mAh 15 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User reviews
User score
Design & Materials
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Performance & Hardware
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Camera
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Connectivity
35 reviews
35 reviews
35 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 17%Less than a day
- 23%One day
- 51%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
35 reviews
Software
- 18%It comes with a clean operating system
- 79%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
35 reviews
- 6%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 45%Every six months
- 36%Every two months or less
35 reviews
- Its a mediocre phone that gets the job done.
The battery of this phone can get through rough gaming for a couple of hours and it would be more than enough for the day.The camera of the phone is not that good. For the videos, you only have HD 30 fps and FHD 30 fps options.The phone has 48mp for wide, 8mp for ultrawide 2mp for macro and 2mp for depth.The front cameras fps's are same as the backs and the front camera has 13mp I think thats a bit bad but its decent for its price but if you are interested in camera and have a low budget i wouldn't reccomend this phone.The screen is unfortunately 720 * 1600 meaning its hd.The brightness is ok.I generally use it in medium but its not good against sunlight at all.Overall, i think this is an ok phone for its price but i would reccomend something else.
Pros- Good battery
- Does not overheat
- Decent performence
- Fine for its price
Cons- Does not get updates frequently
- Low resolution
- Low video fps
- No 4K video
- 7.2
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - It is not a phone that I would recommend
The design doesn't look pretty to me, although it could be a lot worse.
The mobile screen is something good, it has good angles, good colors, the 90Hz is well balanced, I doubt that more is needed, your problem is having an HD + resolution that may or may not be understood.
The main camera has a good balance, the definition is good and the colors are correct, the selfie is relatively good, good colors, the shadows are balanced, the definition is fine, perhaps against the light it leaves something to be desired and at night there is something. noise.
The stabilization in the video is fine, good colors and good shadows.
The power is fairly regular, not bad but could be a lot better.
The battery lasts well, the processor does not consume much battery, this is compensated by the amoled screen.
The connectivity is normal, in the standard for this price.
In conclusion, it is not a bad phone but for $ 225 there are better options.Pros- Camera
- Battery
- Software
Cons- HD+ Res
- Processor
- Price
- 7.8
- Screen7.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood cameras if you have good lighting, the full-frame is super smooth on maximum graphics and CODM on minimum graphics too, very durable
It's very, very resistant to drops. I've been using it for over four years and it's fallen countless times, and it only has a few scratches on the back. Obviously, it's always used with a case and screen protector. The performance is decent if you know how to optimize games and tweak a few settings. It does get incredibly hot, though, haha. I even put it in the freezer after playing for 20 minutes, but I haven't had any FPS drops. The battery used to last me a day and a half, and obviously, over time, the battery deteriorated, and now it lasts a little over half a day. But I'm not constantly carrying the charger around like iPhones, haha. I think in a year I'll upgrade to a Poco F7 Ultra or F8 Pro, and if by some miracle I find a good price, maybe a Nippon 3 or Oppo Find X8 Pro. Well, that's about it. Don't buy this phone today, but it was amazing back in the day, haha.
View original review- 6.7
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.8
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.3
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoA cost-effective cell phone focused on everyday life
The cell phone in general, it is good in aspects such as, Performance in relation to the price (the 200k of Antutu is not just that), as a born gamer I liked the performance in relation to the price CodM (low graphics): 45fps with instability I did not find it so good in cameras, especially at night, the photo comes out blurry, even cleaning the camera well, the four cameras leave something to be desired, in all aspects.
Pros- Performance versus price
- Battery with moderate use
- Design
- Multitouch screen
- Durability
Cons- Cameras
- Update failures
- Sound
- Wi-Fi
View original review- 6.6
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity4.5
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.5
- Screen8.3
- Performance9.6
- Camera10
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoThe phone is good, but it is not a good option for 2024
The phone itself has a lot of benefits, but for this price it's not really worth it right now. Screen--- the screen technology is what surprises me the most, a SUPER AMOLED from Samsung, the resolution is reasonable, the refresh rate is 60hz-90hz, the space occupied by the camera is very small, the touch refresh rate is great. Design--- The phone offers a great design for me, the 4 cameras on the back manage to make the phone unique (in fact M52, A12 also have the same model) the corners are reasonable, I wanted to make them bigger, its thickness is reasonable, great keys, fingerprint is extremely fast and agile, just clicking for half a second and it unlocks. Processing--- My current version (4gb ram-128gb rom) satisfies me a lot, in fact it crashes after years of use, my gaming experience was great, I was surprised. The Helio G85 is a great mid-range processor, but if you're looking for a high-end phone, look for the Poco C65 or Redmi 13c. Camera--- Main 50MPX: I really liked the camera, it can take good photos with great resolution. UltraWide: I really liked it, but it needed more resolution and quality. Macro: Very good camera, but they could improve the resolution. Connectivity--- I really liked it, great connectivity is perfect, Samsung got this model right. Battery--- I liked it a little, the durability is great, I've been using it for about 3 years and went from 5000mAh to 4850mAh, I found it durable. It doesn't last long for me, as I use the phone for a long time.
Pros- Battery
- Connectivity
- Impactful design
- Super AMOLED
- Processor
Cons- Price
- Bluetooth
- Macro and Ultrawide Camera
- Resolution
View original review- 7.3
- Screen7.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - 8.5
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- 7
- Screen7.7
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.