you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- 6.6"TFT LCD (IPS)FHD+20:9
- 203 g76.4 mm167.2 mm9.0 mm
- Dimensity 700 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v10 379.800
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 S5KGM2 23SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 10
- 2
- 2
- 0
- 1
- Screen7.9
- Performance7.8
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity9.1
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Performance & Hardware
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Camera
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Connectivity
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 27%One day
- 67%More than one day
- 7%Two days or more
15 reviews
Software
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 86%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
15 reviews
- 0%Never
- 8%Once a year
- 77%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
15 reviews
User reviews
- Autogood for a common person horrible to play
It is a good phone for everyday use but any game, even undemanding games, hangs a lot because it is a mobile phone with potential but its MediaTek processor slows it down, which made it impossible to play and receive calls without it collapsing.
Pros- has nfc
- good coverage
- comfortable
- decent photos for a common user
Cons- problems playing
- it doesn't look good in full sun
View original review- 4.2
- Screen5.2
- Performance3.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - 9.7
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoIF IT IS AT A GOOD PRICE IT IS WORTH IT
The rear camera is god, the front camera is passable, performance is fine but don't demand too much of it because it explodes xdxdd apart from that it has a mediatek processor and maybe it gets hot
Pros- Rear camera
- 1080 screen resolution
- Battery
- refresh rate 90hz
Cons- Frontal camera
- tft screen
- No optical stabilization
- Price (sometimes it is too expensive)
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe mid-range with 5g
It is the best mobile with 5g for less than 200 euros. It has a chrome finish (Gray color) It has the dimension 700 5g chip that performs well for the price. It has android 13 and it will arrive until 14 and maybe 15
Pros- Android 13
- 5g
- Performance
- Drums
- 3.5mm jack
- cameras
Cons- I could have the dimension 900 easily
- It's too expensive
View original review- 9
- Screen9.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoI think it's a good phone, value for money
It is a good phone, it has worked spectacularly for me, I recommend it. Especially because of the processor, it is better than a mid-range Snapdragon. The bad thing is that it has a bad screen compared to the 4g model
Pros- Photos
- night photos
- Processor
- RAM
- Internal storage
- shock protection
Cons- IPS screen
- The speakers get hot (after a lot of use)
View original review- 9.6
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 30 days ago
- Features 6 months ago
- Aliases 1 year ago
Score
- 5.5 Design & Materials
- 6.0 Performance & Hardware
- 6.5 Camera
- 7.1 Connectivity
- 7.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.