you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- 6.5"TFT LCD (IPS)HD+20:9
- 205 g76.1 mm164.2 mm9.1 mm
- Dimensity 720 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 128 GB
- v8 249.720
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 S5KGM2 234SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 7
- 4
- 0
- 2
- 4
- Screen7.3
- Performance6.4
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.8
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Performance & Hardware
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Camera
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Connectivity
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 29%One day
- 59%More than one day
- 12%Two days or more
17 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 82%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 18%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
17 reviews
- 7%Never
- 20%Once a year
- 33%Every six months
- 40%Every two months or less
17 reviews
User reviews
- AutoI do not recommend it
I bought it yesterday. It came from a BQ Aquaris 5 plus 4g. Many laugh at this last one, I only changed it because the battery wears out very quickly. Well, the A325g is a donut. It's heavy, the screen whitens the colors, Netfix looks sad. The photos are not pretty. The rear chambers protrude in addition to looking bad, they will scratch. Really disappointed. If I can sell it I will exchange it for the A-52 even if it is 4g and costs a little more. If you can, don't buy it.
Pros- that the battery works
Cons- The screen
- The camera
- The heavy weight
- It is expensive for what it is
- The optics protrude, they scratch
View original review- 1.1
- Screen2.2
- Performance2.3
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoCamera and design at another level.
I liked the design a lot and the camera is of very good quality, so I recommend this mobile if you are going to be very photographic. In terms of performance, it is somewhat poor as it is a modest mediatek.
Pros- Camera
- Audio
- Design
- Battery
- build quality
Cons- Performance on demanding tasks
- Screen cutouts and general quality in the version
View original review- 8.8
- Screen8.7
- Performance7.6
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 5 months ago
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Version, Name, Aliases, Features 2 years ago
- Market, SIM card, SIM card 2 years ago
Score
- 4.9 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 6.5 Camera
- 6.9 Connectivity
- 7.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.