you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy A41
- 6.1"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 152 g70.0 mm150.0 mm7.9 mm
- Helio P65 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v8 183.200
- 3500 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX582 Exmor RS 23SELF 24.8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 2
- 0
- Screen7.3
- Performance5.2
- Camera6.6
- Connectivity7.4
- Battery7.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
- 9%Less than half day
- 18%Less than a day
- 27%One day
- 27%More than one day
- 18%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 10%It comes with a clean operating system
- 60%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 30%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 0%Never
- 10%Once a year
- 70%Every six months
- 20%Every two months or less
11 reviews
User reviews
- AutoMy experience with the device
Experience with the A41 from Samsung: Display: The display of the A41 is a good Super Amoled (Oled) display, which I can't complain about myself. However, I expect 90 or 120Hz myself in this price range. I find 60Hz a bit too little, as cheaper cell phones like the Oppo a54 5g 90Hz or the Xiaomi Redmi note 10 Pro offer 120Hz. Processor: The processor is a relatively good processor in this price range. For me it achieved the following results in the Geekbench 5 test: Single Core: 297 points Multi Core: 1186 points. In my opinion these are mediocre. I would describe the everyday performance as good/average to slightly weak. Camera: The phone's camera takes beautiful, and quite good, pictures during the day, which I can't really complain about. However, the quality of the night images is rather poor. For me, the price range also lacks a night mode, which you would actually expect. All I can say about the front camera is that I wouldn't necessarily describe it as very good. I find them rather average for the price. Battery: The battery is a pretty good battery that allows me to get through almost a day without having to fully recharge it. But sometimes I still have to make a short stop at the charging cable. Conclusion: For me, the Samsung Galaxy A41 is partly convincing, but partly less so. Points of criticism are the night images and the processor performance, which shows a rather mediocre performance in Geekbench 5. You get more for a little less money than with this cell phone.The positive points are the daytime images and the display, which for me scores with a high resolution and a good size. In general, I would recommend the Samsung Galaxy A41 to users who don't expect a lot from a cell phone and would rather make phone calls and take one or two good pictures.
Pros- Daily pictures
- display
Cons- Night pictures
- processor
View original review- 7.2
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoTerrible touch screen and poor quality photos
Pros: - very good battery life - screen displaying beautiful colors - efficient networks Cons: - very poor touch screen, you have to click several times to confirm a choice - blurry or no-contrast daytime photos and totally black night photos (my old S7 took much better photos) - Samsung updates removing useful features (including dual SIM which disappeared in January 2022 WTF) - SIM+SD drawer often in poor contact (2 SIM burnt out and one SD burnt out in 18 months )
Pros- very good autonomy
- screen displaying beautiful colors
- efficient networks (captures very well in 4G)
Cons- very bad touch screen, you have to click several times to validate a choice
- Pictures
- Samsung updates
- wear of SIM and SD cards
View original review- 3.5
- Screen7.2
- Performance2.3
- Camera5.3
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery10
View answers - AutoWaste of money
Enough for 4-6 hours of continuous work. I can say this with 100% certainty. I've been using them for over a year. It bent a little above the center, it is not critical, it absolutely does not affect the work, if you do not look closely at the case, but it is not visible, and there are absolutely no side effects on the screen.
Pros- small screen
Cons- Battery
View original review- 4.2
- Screen4.6
- Performance2.0
- Camera4.6
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoNice design, but not camera (I sent it back it's so bad)
The phone has a very good super-amoled display and looks great too with the large user interface. But the processing and the plastic are extremely cheap, the back can be pressed in and you can feel the thin plastic on the back. In addition, the camera is very bad. Photos are very blurry and there is no FHD 60fps video recording. The mobile phone often does not react correctly and too slowly. The fingerprint sensor could be better. Overall, prefer to access a Google Pixel 4a and spend a little more money on a compact cell phone, because the A41 is more cheap than cheap.
Pros- Design / handiness
- Interface / One UI
- Display
Cons- camera
- materials
- Bugs / stutters
- fingerprint
View original review- 2.6
- Screen7.2
- Performance1.6
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 20 days ago
- Name, Storage 6 months ago
- Version 6 months ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.5 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.5 Camera
- 6.7 Connectivity
- 4.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.