you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A72 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A72
- Ki Cost-effective Score7.6
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Display quality
- NFC
- Telephoto lens
Cons- No good for gaming
- 6.7"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 203 g77.4 mm165.0 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 720g Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- v8 285.000
- 5000 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 234SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android 11
User score
- 16
- 4
- 0
- 1
- 1
- Screen9.1
- Performance8.5
- Camera8.8
- Connectivity8.9
- Battery8.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
Performance & Hardware
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
Camera
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
Connectivity
22 reviews
22 reviews
22 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 5%Less than a day
- 36%One day
- 45%More than one day
- 14%Two days or more
22 reviews
Software
- 5%It comes with a clean operating system
- 71%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 24%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
22 reviews
- 0%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 47%Every six months
- 41%Every two months or less
22 reviews
User reviews
- Very good
Very good smartphone, vfm. the screen is beautiful. the quality seems nice even though it's back is plastic it looks good and is nice.
Sound with the stereo speakers is very good!!
Haven't tried it in high requirements games for a long, but it is very good in daily use and doesn't get high temperatures!!
Camera has very nice colors and video quality is awesome!! The pictures even in daylight don't have very nice resolution quality in all ratios. It's better in pro mode and ratio 3:4.
Good battery, heavy use and still lasts all day!!
The UI was a bit dificult to get used to it!!(coming from miui wich was much better)Pros- screen
- video quality
- design
- battery
- waterproof
Cons- photo quality(resolution)
- 9.5
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoI think it is a very good phone for daily use in basic or demanding tasks, very good in games and very heavy apps.Pros
- screen
- cameras
- performance
- design
- your updates
- its ip67 is very good
Cons- its footprint is very slow
- I feel like they should have added 120hz.
- I don't know but there are times when it gets very hot
View original review- 9
- Screen8.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.2
- Screen10
- Performance8.3
- Camera10
- Connectivity3.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoThe cell phone is excellent but there is one thing that kills it which is the a52 5g
seriously besides the a52 5g having a snapdragon 750g and it's much cheaper besides the a52 being the same cell phone if you want a cell phone with the same characteristics as the cheaper and stronger a72 get the a52 5g and depending on the price the a52s 5g can be ok cheaper than the a72 i've seen the a52s 5g has a snapdragon 778 which is very good
Pros- IP 67
- super amoled
- Gorilla Glass
- Camera
Cons- Snapdragon 720g
- IP 67
- Gorilla Glass
View original review- 6.6
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.1
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
Score
- 6.6 Design & Materials
- 6.1 Performance & Hardware
- 6.6 Camera
- 7.3 Connectivity
- 7.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.