Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 5"HD68% useful16:9
- 138 g 71.0 mm 142.3 mm 7.9 mm
- SC9830 Quad-Core 1.5 GB RAM 8 GB
- v6 22.426
- 2600 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · Unknow SELF 2 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
User score
- 11
- 9
- 11
- 10
- 8
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.8
- Camera4.9
- Connectivity7.1
- Battery5.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
Performance & Hardware
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
Camera
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
Connectivity
49 opinions
49 opinions
49 opinions
Battery
- 10%Less than half day
- 46%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 15%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
49 opinions
Software
- 11%It comes with a clean operating system
- 43%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 47%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
49 opinions
- 34%Never
- 34%Once a year
- 25%Every six months
- 7%Every two months or less
49 opinions
User reviews
User Reviews
- megyeribettinaSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320F1 year agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- AlexandruGurguSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320DS1 year agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- tehganpSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?ContinueSamsung’s horrible for budget phones
Cheap and cheap feeling. When I had my S5 I had it in to get its speakers repaired and was given this one in the meantime. Feels much cheaper, is slippery, and is made of plastic. Not even good plastic! Operation is incredibly sluggish, feels just like any other Samsung budget phone (not quite as bad as the EARLY ones though.) Stay away from Samsung as a budget brand, either buy used or Xiaomi.
Pros- Inexpensive
Cons- Sluggish
- Cheap build
- Bad even for the price
- 2.2
- Screen4.0
- Performance1.6
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - MOHAMED_AHMEDSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320DS2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- lancsaktibiSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- JLNRSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- antoni.domenech.montanaSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320F3 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- marc0menSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320DS3 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- ivindieselSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320DS4 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- ibragimovinomjon01Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 8GB · J320DS1 month agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
Score
- 3.5 Design & Materials
- 2.8 Performance & Hardware
- 2.3 Camera
- 4.7 Connectivity
- 3.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.