you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy M12 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy M12
- 6.4"TFT LCD (IPS)HD+20:9
- 221 g75.9 mm164.0 mm9.7 mm
- Exynos 850 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 117.341 v8
- 5000 mAh 15 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/2.0 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android 11
User reviews
User score
- 2
- 3
- 0
- 2
- 3
- Screen4.8
- Performance4.5
- Camera4.9
- Connectivity5.7
- Battery6.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Performance & Hardware
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Camera
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Connectivity
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Battery
- 10%Less than half day
- 30%Less than a day
- 20%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
10 reviews
Software
- 10%It comes with a clean operating system
- 50%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 40%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
10 reviews
- 11%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 33%Every six months
- 44%Every two months or less
10 reviews
- Very good 2021 Samsung budget phone
Good, wide IPS display for watching videos and playing games but mediocre to average readability outdoors depending on where you read it. Game tested the 90hz display on Arknights, good performance there while Genshin Impact is at least playable. Good daylight photos on both front and rear cameras, 48MP mode shots are just about OK, while night time/low light performance are (again) average for a budget camera phone. Sounds, audio and speaker performance are good. Side fingerprint recognition is quick and snappy. Mobile signals, wifi, bluetooth, GPS, USB OTG, microSD, FM radio and mirror/cast are also working satisfactorily within expectations. No notification LED but the camera LED and the screen can be used for light notification. The 5000 mAh has a very good endurance that it will last more than a day on moderate usage, unfortunately even with Samsung's adaptive fast charging, >10% charge to full will take over 2 hours!
Pros- Good IPS 90hz display
- Excellent price-performance ratio in my opinion
- Good camera performance for it's price
Cons- Samsung's adaptive fast charging sucks for this phone
- No notification LED
- No IP rating
- 7
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt is a good cell phone and with a good processor
I like the cell phone for games, a good processor but what I don't like is the RAM although I can't demand too much from it, some older phones get stuck less than this one when entering an app
Pros- Processor
- Design
- Screen
- Updates
Cons- Volume
- RAM
- Battery
- Burden
- Without HDR
View original review- 6.7
- Screen5.2
- Performance6.0
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity7.5
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoTerrible model
Reception is poor, internet is slow, including wifi. Even in the zone of reliable reception, it catches worse than others, including the Chinese. The body is made of unreliable plastic. The screen is “blind” (in the sun), not IPS. The sensor is weak and glitchy, there seems to be no oleophobic coating. Typing text is a pain, swipe is glitchy. It lags if there are a couple of applications in memory. It doesn’t want to unload anything until the last moment, it slows down, then it’s difficult to load everything back, often unsuccessfully. There are still three advantages: 1. Photo quality in good lighting is at the level of averages up to $250. 2. Operating time up to 3 days, with 3 hours of screen time per day. If you use it more often, you can discharge it in 16 hours. 3. 90 Hz screen.
View original review- 1.1
- Screen0.7
- Performance2.0
- Camera1.5
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoNot very much
Bottom, it throttles terribly, there is no 5G, that is, you will only have Internet up to 37.5 Mbit, maybe a little higher, the processor itself is weak, 4GB of Opra is very, very small for a phone, the camera is so-so, but if you choose the right angle, then it’s fine.
View original review- 2.9
- Screen6.2
- Performance1.3
- Camera3.2
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 8 months ago
- Operating System 3 years ago
- Capacity (mAh) 3 years ago
- Features 3 years ago
Score
- 5.1 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 6.6 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 6.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
