8.0

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

User score

Overall satisfaction
8.7
  • 29
  • 4
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
34 reviews
  • Screen8.4
  • Performance8.3
  • Camera8.3
  • Connectivity8.9
  • Battery8.5
Want to comment on the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.8

34 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
8.8

34 reviews

Is it comfortable?
8.8

34 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
8.3

34 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
7.6

34 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
9.1

34 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
8.3

34 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
8.7

34 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
7.7

34 reviews

Quality of selfies
8.4

34 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
8.5

34 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
9.0

34 reviews

Quality of the GPS
8.8

34 reviews

And the WiFi?
9.0

34 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 0%
    Less than half day
  • 3%
    Less than a day
  • 24%
    One day
  • 65%
    More than one day
  • 9%
    Two days or more

34 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 0%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 85%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 15%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

34 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 0%
    Never
  • 4%
    Once a year
  • 52%
    Every six months
  • 44%
    Every two months or less

34 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Good intermediate phone

    • 7.8
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery9.0
  • d

    • 8
    • Screen8.2
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera6.2
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • The best mid-range phones, without a doubt

    • 8.8
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance8.3
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery9.0
  • Good phone

    Pros
    • Good Gaming
    • Smooth every day usage
    • Good photos
    Cons
    • Doesn't have stereo sound
    • 9.8
    • Screen10
    • Performance9.0
    • Camera8.7
    • Connectivity9.6
    • Battery9.0
  • Good phone for the price i bought it (239 eur)

    The phone is great. What I like the most: Good big screen and nice battery life, but the phone is very light
    The things I don't like, is that it doesn't have 3.5mm jack and the max volume is quite low (also because of only one speaker, so it can get covered inside your pocket and I end up missing some notifiations. Also, the vibration while typing isn't the best

    Pros
    • Screen
    • Battery
    • Weight
    • Overall appearence
    Cons
    • No 3.5mm jack
    • Only 1 speaker
    • Low maximum volume
    • Haptic feedback motors not the best one
    • 8.3
    • Screen9.3
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera8.0
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Great device but there are already better intermediaries 8/256 with IP 67

    In the Antutu benchmark (v10) I ran the test several times and it didn't exceed 540k, great, it's a great device for everyday life, it doesn't crash at all, the battery lasts a whole day with 30% left at night, it films at 60fps 1080p on the front and back but you can't expect perfection from an intermediary, the only defect in it that bothered me is the screen, in itself it's great but in the sun it's horrible even with maximum brightness, the rest I already bought knowing it wasn't It had an IP 67 and a headphone jack Summary: if you're going to buy it used for a low price, it's ok, but paying a lot is no longer worth it, despite being a great device in my opinion, in 2024 it's no longer worth a device with 6 RAM and 128 memory In everyday life, the system only consumes 3.5GB of RAM and the memory when installing my apps consumed 80GB of the system, in other words, make an effort and jump to 8/256 and with IP 67

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Fluidity
    • Camera
    • WiFi 6
    • Snapdragon 778g
    • Fast fingerprint sensor
    Cons
    • Screen over the sun is bad
    • 8.5
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera9.0
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Excellent. For the price, it does everything it needs to do.

    Very good. I've been using it for almost 1 year and I recommend it. The only drawback I have is that it is not water resistant.

    Pros
    • Price
    • RAM memory
    Cons
    • Water resistance
    • selfie camera
    • 8.3
    • Screen7.6
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    It is a good mobile considering the price range at which it went on sale, its snapdragon 778g 5g can run everything

    In construction quality it is bad, everything is plastic and over time it can look a little bad (nothing that a case can't fix), it stayed on Android 13 and one me 5.1, it integrates a snapdragon 778g 5g which is enough good for running almost all games in ultra graphics (genshin impact at 50-60 fps all at maximum, call of duty Mobile at 40-60 fps with 120hz, ultra graphics, maximum refresh rate, super resolution etc., can run pubg in hdr, forza and fortnite in epic graphics at 30 fps 25-30 fps stable), in sound it is not the best but it is decent, the typical 5000mah battery that lasts a day and a little more with 60hz and 18 hours (maybe more, depending on use) at 120hz, decent screen and the same size

    • 8.6
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera8.0
    • Connectivity9.3
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    fairly good

    • 7
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera7.7
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Ok but it has a lot of cons

    Good phone, ok screen (amoled gets hot and traces of burn in appear), ok sound (mono, balanced but no bass and at most trebles are strident), ok processor (handles games but gets hot easily, if not with games with demanding multitaskers), ok rear cameras (by day it has good quality, except the ultrawide, at night the software saves) bad front camera (for the price it is relevant, but not impressive at all), more or less rear camcorder (only the main one of saves the day, ultrawide is bad even during the day, and at night it doesn't work), bad front camcorder (only with a lot of light and without abusing the hdr), very good battery (minimum of 8 hours of screen, minimum of 5 abusing, take more than 12), digital reader responsive to the price. Slow ram and bad system optimization.

    • 6.1
    • Screen5.5
    • Performance4.6
    • Camera5.2
    • Connectivity6.6
    • Battery9.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
May 5, 2024
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 18 days ago
  • Features 1 year ago
  • Fast charge 1 year ago
  • AnTuTu 2 years ago
  • Camera 2 years ago
  • Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 2 years ago
8.0
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 7.0 Design & Materials
  • 7.0 Performance & Hardware
  • 7.2 Camera
  • 7.9 Connectivity
  • 7.2 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.