Samsung Galaxy M52 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- 6.7"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 173 g76.4 mm164.2 mm7.4 mm
- SnapD. 778 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 589.200
- 5000 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 GW3 23SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
Design & Materials
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Performance & Hardware
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Camera
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Connectivity
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 3%Less than a day
- 24%One day
- 64%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
33 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 85%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
33 reviews
- 0%Never
- 4%Once a year
- 52%Every six months
- 44%Every two months or less
33 reviews
User reviews
- Good phone for the price i bought it (239 eur)
The phone is great. What I like the most: Good big screen and nice battery life, but the phone is very light
The things I don't like, is that it doesn't have 3.5mm jack and the max volume is quite low (also because of only one speaker, so it can get covered inside your pocket and I end up missing some notifiations. Also, the vibration while typing isn't the bestPros- Screen
- Battery
- Weight
- Overall appearence
Cons- No 3.5mm jack
- Only 1 speaker
- Low maximum volume
- Haptic feedback motors not the best one
- 8.3
- Screen9.3
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGreat device but there are already better intermediaries 8/256 with IP 67
In the Antutu benchmark (v10) I ran the test several times and it didn't exceed 540k, great, it's a great device for everyday life, it doesn't crash at all, the battery lasts a whole day with 30% left at night, it films at 60fps 1080p on the front and back but you can't expect perfection from an intermediary, the only defect in it that bothered me is the screen, in itself it's great but in the sun it's horrible even with maximum brightness, the rest I already bought knowing it wasn't It had an IP 67 and a headphone jack Summary: if you're going to buy it used for a low price, it's ok, but paying a lot is no longer worth it, despite being a great device in my opinion, in 2024 it's no longer worth a device with 6 RAM and 128 memory In everyday life, the system only consumes 3.5GB of RAM and the memory when installing my apps consumed 80GB of the system, in other words, make an effort and jump to 8/256 and with IP 67
Pros- Battery
- Fluidity
- Camera
- WiFi 6
- Snapdragon 778g
- Fast fingerprint sensor
Cons- Screen over the sun is bad
View original review- 8.5
- Screen7.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 8.3
- Screen7.6
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoIt is a good mobile considering the price range at which it went on sale, its snapdragon 778g 5g can run everything
In construction quality it is bad, everything is plastic and over time it can look a little bad (nothing that a case can't fix), it stayed on Android 13 and one me 5.1, it integrates a snapdragon 778g 5g which is enough good for running almost all games in ultra graphics (genshin impact at 50-60 fps all at maximum, call of duty Mobile at 40-60 fps with 120hz, ultra graphics, maximum refresh rate, super resolution etc., can run pubg in hdr, forza and fortnite in epic graphics at 30 fps 25-30 fps stable), in sound it is not the best but it is decent, the typical 5000mah battery that lasts a day and a little more with 60hz and 18 hours (maybe more, depending on use) at 120hz, decent screen and the same size
View original review- 8.6
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoOk but it has a lot of cons
Good phone, ok screen (amoled gets hot and traces of burn in appear), ok sound (mono, balanced but no bass and at most trebles are strident), ok processor (handles games but gets hot easily, if not with games with demanding multitaskers), ok rear cameras (by day it has good quality, except the ultrawide, at night the software saves) bad front camera (for the price it is relevant, but not impressive at all), more or less rear camcorder (only the main one of saves the day, ultrawide is bad even during the day, and at night it doesn't work), bad front camcorder (only with a lot of light and without abusing the hdr), very good battery (minimum of 8 hours of screen, minimum of 5 abusing, take more than 12), digital reader responsive to the price. Slow ram and bad system optimization.
View original review- 6.1
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.6
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.