you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy M53 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score7.4
- Pros
- Battery
- Display quality
- Performance
Cons- No Mini Jack
- No water and dust protection
- Sound
- 6.7"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 176 g77.0 mm164.7 mm7.4 mm
- Dimensity 900 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 500.100 v10
- 5000 mAh 25 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User reviews
User score
- 12
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 2
- Screen7.9
- Performance8.4
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe it's a powerful phone with good value for money for many. They highlight its general performance and battery, although some criticize the plastic body and report software failures or an uncomfortable size.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is excellent, with vivid colors and 120Hz. Although some report fragility or touch failures, its visual quality is highly valued.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is fluid and powerful, ideal for demanding games and daily use without overheating. Virtual RAM contributes to a seamless experience.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the rear camera is almost perfect and records in 4K, but the front camera is only good, and the overall video quality generates mixed opinions.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G connectivity is a plus. However, they lament the absence of a jack port and mono audio, as well as the lack of accessories in the box.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is excellent and long-lasting, holding up for a full day even with intensive use, making it a very strong point.
- 0%Less than half day
- 24%Less than a day
- 35%One day
- 35%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
17 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 82%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 12%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
17 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 53%Every six months
- 47%Every two months or less
17 reviews
- Suitable for continuous intensive and prolonged use of the category of employees and workers working long hours outside the home
A very wonderful phone for intensive continuous use throughout the day for the category of employees or workers with a long-lasting battery and without obstacles in the work except that the screen must be protected and with protection the response on the screen is somewhat less, and Samsung is very stingy in providing accessories as it does not give a charger with the phone and there is no cover For the phone, there is a very bad and poor charging cord in the box, and the user will have to buy a charging cord, charger, cover and screen protector in exchange for other money
Pros- Fast to use and excellent long lasting battery
- Fast to use and excellent long lasting battery
Cons- The screen is not waterproof and dustproof
- The screen is not waterproof and dustproof
- 2
- Screen5.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - Uhm
Very powerful gaming phone, i mostly play on it. Só it only goes like for 5 - 3 hours on screen. Which is kinda above average. Also, the screen is SA which is super good! I wished it had a better screen like QWHD+
Pros- powerful SoC
- Good cameras
- Zoom
- Screen type
Cons- No dust proof
- No water proof
- Screen quality (FHD+)
- 7.5
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.3
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt's a decent mobile, but the quality/price is bad.
I've had this phone for almost 5 years now, and it's not very good. It has a good screen and good speed for everyday use. The camera is poor, and the battery is excellent. After 5 years, it only lasts me a day, with approximately 4 hours of daily use. But what I dislike the most about the phone is that the fingerprint reader isn't designed for left-handed users and doesn't work.
Pros- Battery
- Screen
- Speed
Cons- Lack of jack port
- Fragile screen
- Poor camera
- Right-handed fingerprint reader
View original review- 6.1
- Screen5.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.2
- Screen10
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- 10
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Sensor Model 2 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Features 3 years ago
- Name, Storage 3 years ago
- On Sale 3 years ago
- RAM 4 years ago
Score
- 6.2 Design & Materials
- 6.2 Performance & Hardware
- 7.2 Camera
- 7.4 Connectivity
- 6.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
