you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9"AMOLEDWQHD+20:9
- 222 g76.0 mm166.9 mm8.8 mm
- Exynos 990 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 128 GB
- v9 623.915
- 5000 mAh
- 1 108 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 Bright S5KHM1 234SELF 40 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 30
- 4
- 1
- 2
- 1
- Screen8.4
- Performance9.1
- Camera8.8
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery6.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Performance & Hardware
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Camera
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Connectivity
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Battery
- 5%Less than half day
- 26%Less than a day
- 39%One day
- 21%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
38 reviews
Software
- 3%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 22%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
38 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 44%Every six months
- 56%Every two months or less
38 reviews
User reviews
- Great phone, still receives updates every 2 months, has a very good camera and gives most phones a run for their moneyPros
- Great screen
- Amazing front cam
- Well optimized and smooth
- Really good HDR
- Decent rear camera
- Great Ultrawide and Telephoto
Cons- Pretty bad night mode
- Battery life has decreased a good bit (4yr old)
- Main camera suffers from focusing issues
- Jittery video when zooming
- 9.5
- Screen10
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood but annoying
I had a S20 Ultra 5G version Snapdragon 865 which was cool, it was a mobile phone that was very resistant to strong shocks even with a curved screen, which was exceptional, I loved its camera and the crazy thing was its power in games, fast storage and huge RAM memory of 12 physical Gigs that no matter how hard I tried I was never close to filling them, and these 12 Gigs could still be expanded to 20 virtual gigs, its loading was fast but from my point of view for such a good phone it is somewhat slow Yes, its battery was consumed in hours of use, and with 120hz active a cup of soda did not even reach midday. On the other hand, it bothered me that I would no longer receive One UI 6, which prompted me to look for another mobile phone since I Being a fan of technology, I like to be with the best, and I am not at all pleased that in a matter of 3 years it has been left without news, changing the subject, something that was the zoom, since seeing that it had 100x it had thousands of uses that I didn't know how photos of the moon turned out spectacular, and being able to impress friends with its zoom, its screen was the best, being a 6" Dynamic AMOLED.8 inches WQHD+ at 120Hz with decent brightness in full sun and excellent attenuation at night, the fingerprint reader, although on the screen, was located in a comfortable position and was quite large, although returning to the performance issue, it is in the middle of a transmission What I was doing on Discord while playing, this phone reached 46°C according to the battery thermometer which caused it to close due to overheating of the device, forcing me to play with adaptive graphics and with an fps rate limited to 30 although, These devices come with a factory error that was the straw that broke the camel's back, the famous "white screen" or "screen of death" plagues all the Galaxy of the S20 family and my poor Ultra had it, when paying for repairs the extremely expensive screen, so I sold it but it was an unforgettable experience, I recommend it
Pros- Cameras
- Performance
- Design
- Telephoto lens
- night photos
- Endurance
Cons- Faulty screen
- Battery
- Fast charging (45w)
- Weight
- Refrigeration
- Back cover material
View original review- 8.7
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoOld high-end that still stands
With the few weeks of use that I've been using it, I'm doing quite well, I'm going with the technical: The screen is great, you put it in natural color mode and it gets a very faithful color to reality, the brightness is sufficient in the sun, the low brightness is not so low but there is a dimmer in the system. I haven't tried HDR content yet so I can't comment on that. The excellent cameras, the TV is a blessing, there are times when you don't want to use it (in dark environments or with not so much detail) and it activates yes or yes at 10X, it normally activates at 4X. Note that you can only change from camera to camera if the video is at 30FPS, at 60FPS it is digital zoom and you cannot change to wide angle. At night it loses too much, but when processed it becomes a more acceptable photograph. The stabilization is A PASS, it is very easy to take photos in a high tele range without blurring, it makes it GREAT. The selfie is great, although sometimes it does white balances inaccurate and comes out more greenish (especially in dark environments) but in general it's great, it supports video up to 4K 60FPS, I haven't recorded videos yet so I won't go into detail. Yes, you can take pictures of the moon, they come out beautiful. The performance I had with Exynos was disappointing, it has high aliasing in games, it heats up very easily, its efficiency is ok. I didn't expect to be so weighed down here, but for daily use it starts everything faster than an SD870 I had, probably because it has been on the market for 3 years and it will be super optimized for it.The battery is ok, with 120hz it FLIES, no wonder you can't use 120hz in 2K+ because otherwise it wouldn't last at all. The efficiency is better than I expected, in one night it loses an average of 2-3% with everything removed and all plane mud. The charge is quite good, it charges in 40 minutes with the ultra-fast charge of 10%-80%. Battery performance could be worse. It is a very big phone, it is not for everyone, I have big hands so I had no problems with it, quality materials
Pros- screenshot
- Sound
- Cameras (both OIS and video and selfie)
- resounding vibration
- 45W charging
- Energy efficiency better than expected
Cons- battery with 120hz
- a little microphones
- Night camera
- To say something, it's heavy, I don't think it's inconvenient
- EXYNOS IS VERY BAD
- Ghost touches around the curve of the panel
View original review- 8.5
- Screen6.6
- Performance7.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 days ago
Score
- 8.9 Design & Materials
- 7.6 Performance & Hardware
- 8.3 Camera
- 8.2 Connectivity
- 7.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.