you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- "Ki" Value for Money Score9.2
- Pros
- Camera quality
- Performance
- Operating system
Cons- No FM Radio
- Charger not included
- Charging Speed
- 6.9"AMOLEDWQHD+19.5:9
- 214 g78.1 mm163.6 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 8 Elite G5 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 4.027.702 v11
- 5000 mAh 60 W
- 1 200 Mpx ƒ/1.4 2 50 Mpx ƒ/1.9 3 10 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 50 Mpx ƒ/2.9 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 25
- 1
- 0
- 1
- 1
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.1
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an exceptional and very complete phone, highlighting its premium quality and design. There is a general consensus on its robustness and versatility. However, some find it expensive and feel it doesn't always deliver a premium experience.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen offers excellent quality, with notable colors and brightness. Opinions on its 'Privacy Display' are mixed, with some valuing it and others criticizing it.
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is exceptional, highlighting its speed and power. Opinions on overheating are mixed, with some experiencing it during demanding use.
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main cameras are excellent. However, low-light performance, night photos, the front camera, and the telephoto lens receive criticism.
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, there are no significant comments regarding connectivity (Wi-Fi, 5G, Bluetooth, etc.), suggesting it functions correctly or isn't a problem.
28 reviews
28 reviews
28 reviews
Battery
According to our users, battery life receives mixed reviews. Some find it durable, while others report limited autonomy with intense use or when privacy mode is enabled.
- 4%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 39%One day
- 43%More than one day
- 7%Two days or more
28 reviews
Software
- 18%It comes with a clean operating system
- 71%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 11%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
28 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 36%Every six months
- 64%Every two months or less
28 reviews
- It's a disappointment, the display they mentioned being "privacy screen" barely works
It's a 4th generation of the S22 Ultra same design only tiny tweaks, downgrading since S24 Ultra, I wouldn't recommend Samsung anymore since s25 ultra
Pros- Processor
- Flagship
Cons- Overpriced
- 5000 mAh in the big march 26
- Privacy screen barely works
- Overpriced
- 2.1
- Screen1.5
- Performance4.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoI had a Xiaomi 13 Ultra, I decided to take a chance on the Samsung S26 Ultra and I don't regret it, great phone, very fluid. And the battery lasts well but
I had a Xiaomi 13 Ultra, I decided to take a chance on the Samsung S26 Ultra and I don't regret it, it's a great phone, very fluid. And the battery lasts well. It just doesn't have turbo charging. But it charges quickly with the original 25W charger, I think that's an advantage because it maintains the battery's health.
View original review- 10
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoAnother ultra
Although it surpasses its predecessors in every way, it feels the same. For better or for worse, it's an excellent phone, but it no longer feels like a significant leap forward, not only from its predecessor but also from the S23U.
Pros- Battery
- Privacy Display
Cons- Non-symmetrical design
- Capped spending
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe battery life sucks
This rectangular phone is uncomfortable to hold, and the battery life is far from good, but that's to be expected with only a 5000mAh battery, a 6.9-inch 2K 120Hz screen, and a very power-hungry CPU. Samsung should have followed the trend and incorporated a silicon carbon battery of at least 7000mAh, and upgraded the camera sensors to larger ones, with the main sensor at 1 inch. Charging should have been 100W wired and 50W wireless.
Pros- Screen
- Oneui
- Spen
- 5x zoom
Cons- Autonomy
- Charging speed
- Larger image sensors
View original review- 7.1
- Screen6.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - 9.4
- Screen9.0
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 day ago
- SIM card, SIM card 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Battery Composition 2 months ago
- On Sale 2 months ago
- Version 3 months ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 3 months ago
- Aliases, Market, Features 3 months ago
- Camera, Bluetooth 3 months ago
Score
- 8.3 Design & Materials
- 9.1 Performance & Hardware
- 8.9 Camera
- 9.0 Connectivity
- 7.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
