you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Sharp Aquos C10 reviews by real users Sharp Aquos C10
- 5.5"IGZOFHD+16:9
- 140 g72.0 mm141.8 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 630 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v? 71.500
- 2700 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/1.75 IMX362 Exmor RS 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
User score
- 11
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Performance & Hardware
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Camera
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Connectivity
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 23%Less than a day
- 31%One day
- 38%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
13 reviews
Software
- 23%It comes with a clean operating system
- 77%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
13 reviews
- 50%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 25%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
13 reviews
User reviews
- Great compact size phone with NFC, Antutu V8.3.6 -> 112472
Compact size, type-c, fast charge , 4/64 , NFC, sharp display, good camera (Sony IMX362 Exmor RS) Aperture ƒ/ 1.75 Sensor size 1/2.55
The battery (2700 mAh) could have been bigger, but it’s not so big problem.
For this price is excellent.
I’m sad for just one thing because I can’t get an official update on my phone.Pros- compact size
- camera
- NFC
Cons- no update
- battery
- 8.7
- Screen9.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - ** super phone at a super price !!
It's light in weight & very nice to use.
Pros- camera
- battery
- size
- weight
- price
Cons- very small notification light
- whatsapp audio that I speak come out not so clear
- no upgrade from Android 8
- 9.5
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Fantastic phone which has exceeded all expectations
Firstly, the main worry people may have about this phone is the small battery. I can defuse this worry now - the battery lasts approximately 1.5 days! This is due to the screen technology not using a lot of power. I also have the screen on about 30-35% brightness and this is enough day to day. In bright sunlight it was on almost 100% and it would still last 1 day!
It does everything I need it to do and everything runs really smoothly on the phone. No issues with apps.
The camera is excellent. Really good quality photos and video and excellent low light camera. Better than the Huawei P20 Lite in low light and for general camera use.
It is a low cost phone and this is reflected in the quality of materials. it is plastic backed, a metal back would have made this far more attractive. but for under £100 you really, really cannot complain!Pros- Great camera
- Great screen
- Very good battery life
- Great low light photos
- Excellent size, fits in your pocket!
Cons- OS only available to Android 8.0
- Metal back would be nicer
- Difficult to find accessories in the UK
- 9.7
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoFatal
If you want a mobile phone to use and throw away, this is perfect since it cannot be repaired, and if you call technical service and tell them I would like to repair the broken screen, they literally tell you to buy a new one because replacing only the screen will cost 150 euros and will take more or less 2 months. and if you try to do it in any other technical service they tell you that there are no parts for that model ..... Solution buy a new one
View original review- 8.8
- Screen3.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity3.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoA very good Smarphone which really surprised me! !
Super really a good smartphone from sharp which does not stop improving them from year to year always a little more and the quality is there. Frankly nothing to say with its 4 GB of RAM its internal memory of 64 GB and its snapdragon 630 Octa-Core processor 4 x A53 2.2GHz + 4 x A53 1.8 GHz. NFC, OTG and many other things, it's great! !
Pros- All
Cons- I am still searching?
View original review- 9.4
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoGood and cheap mobile
It is a mobile of contained size and light weight for the mobiles that are now getting bigger and bigger. It does not excel at anything but it does everything well if you are not a demanding user. The battery lasts in a day of use between 4h and 4 and a half screen without games that is not bad for only 2700mha. I use it for calls, Google and social networks and it is perfect, it never gets stuck and works fast. The regular camera, during the day without zooming very good photos but after the light goes down or you zoom in, it starts to make noise and the recording does not ask for much, the normal selfie also complies to make video calls or some sporadic selfie. It is a simple, simple mobile phone that complies well. It has front and works perfect. The front camera a little big but it does not bother, it is a 17/9 screen format. The speaker sounds loud and does not distort but the sound quality is fair. I am satisfied, for € 99 I think not you can ask for more ..
Pros- screen
- Paw print
- Fluency
- Coverage, WiFi
Cons- Camera
- Battery
- Smaller drop chamber
View original review- 9
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.