you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Sony Xperia C4 reviews by real users Sony Xperia C4
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 147 g77.4 mm150.3 mm7.9 mm
- MT6752 Octa-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 42.000
- 2600 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · Unknow Exmor RS SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.0 Lollipop
User score
- 3
- 5
- 2
- 1
- 0
- Screen6.9
- Performance7.2
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity7.8
- Battery5.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
- 9%Less than half day
- 18%Less than a day
- 36%One day
- 27%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 9%It comes with a clean operating system
- 64%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 27%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 9%Never
- 27%Once a year
- 55%Every six months
- 9%Every two months or less
11 reviews
User reviews
- Overall nice feeling phone let down by camera quality and gaming performancePros
- Very nice feel
- Looks premium-ish
- Multi-core performance
Cons- Camera
- 3D Performance
- Single-core performance
- Battery is OK
- No gyroscope
- No more system updates
- 7.4
- Screen8.3
- Performance7.7
- Camera6.8
- Connectivity7.7
View answers - Not so good experience
I have this smartphone since December 2015. One of the things I hate the most is the software update It have never update from 5.1 do not buy it bad investment
Pros- Play games
Cons- Horrible camera
- No sistem update
- 4.6
- Screen7.3
- Performance7.0
- Camera3.3
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoBasic cell
It helped me a lot while I used it, the best thing to me is its camera, it is not the best but it takes pictures very well (day photos), its performance in regular sometimes encouraged but as it did not put heavy applications or many graphics went smoothly. Resistant to falls is not, but what disappointed me most was that the year he failed the touch and not because it changed it worked (by the way the touch came with the whole screen) and the price did not seem very good for a phone Well, it's actually a regular phone with a good camera (say 8/10). In matters of memory it seemed good to me the same can be extended with micro SD.
Pros- The camera
Cons- Your defective touch
- Your RAM
- Your construction material
View original review- 6.6
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoI really liked the quality of Sony photos and applications.
It complied with the requirements it required at that time, however with 6 months of use the touch was damaged, check on several pages and in all there were complaints about that failure of the factory.
Pros- Camera
- screen
- performance
Cons- Battery
View original review- 7.7
- Screen6.8
- Performance8.7
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.