- 5.2"FHD71% useful16:9
- 161 g 72.0 mm 146.0 mm 8.1 mm
- SnapD. 820 Quad-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 124.000
- 2900 mAh
- 1 23 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX300 Exmor RS SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 7%Less than half day
- 45%Less than a day
- 31%One day
- 17%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 72%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 21%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 0%Once a year
- 54%Every six months
- 39%Every two months or less
- In June 2019, this device still able to perform intensive day-to-day task and gaming, but the battery doesn't last that long.
June 2019, this device still able to perform day to day task and gaming. Sometimes the device would hang if it overheated.
The battery drain fast, with average 4h screen on usage and 20h standby. Need to permanently turn on stamina mode.
- Xndr17Sony Xperia XZInternational · 3GB · 64GB · Dual SIM2 years agoExcelent smartphone, with premium design and superb camera
Very fluid smartphone, display is a triluminus one, very confortable in hand, but it heats a bit. NFC is located in a strange position. Fingerprint works very fast and it is well located. Stereo sound is wonderful. Even with Alcalaido back cover, it is not very resistant to fall, use it carefully.Pros
- Cooling system
- NFC position
- Could be better
Sony did it again... Camera issues from z3+ returns and fixed it again on XZS...just like Z3+ is fixed with Z5...
BUILD is good (slippery thou)
Performance and battery works good. Especially since oreo updates.
Too bad about the camera...."why sony...why" your monstrous pixel size causes heating up.?..again...Pros
- AutoFor the price pretty decent
It is a pretty nice mobile, however, being made of aluminum, its back is quite susceptible to scratches, for its part in cameras the photos seem very good, an excellent sound but with a low volume and a very poor battery, since it does not It lasts more than 2 hours of continuous use, its fast charge helps but it is not the best, its resistance to water is very good since on 2 occasions it has been wet by the rain and it is still intact, in terms of performance the equipment heats up quite a bit after a few minutes of gaming use, a lot of improvement performance, and tends to crash too oftenPros
- Resistance to water and dust
- Stereo sound
- Power and performance
- Sound volume
- AutoIt is a mobile that to cost basically 600 euros at the time, is too expensive for what it offers.
It is a mobile that if you play games a little it gets very hot, with the stamina mode with good coverage at night it only consumes one percent of the battery, that is in the first 6 months, then the battery degrades significantly , change the battery after 3 years and it remains the same, so it could be said that it has programmed obsolescence, I don't even use the mobile anymore, because while it charges and I use it it discharges, what I say, what it cost at the time , it is expensive, I should have caught the S7 ... ah and the usb type c degrades tmb, the mi4c of 2015 goes like the first day, you can hang the phone from the cable and it barely grabs, the phone falls by its own weight ....Pros
- Quick fingerprint sensor
- DSEE HX
- I put it in the pool and under the tap
- You hear
- USB Type-C port
- Battery, after 1 year or 3 hours of active screen
- Blah design
- DRM Keys
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 7.0 Design & Materials
- 5.9 Performance & Hardware
- 6.3 Camera
- 7.5 Connectivity
- 4.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.