you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Tecno Pova 4 reviews by real users Tecno Pova 4
- 6.82"LCD IPSHD+21:9
- 212 g77.5 mm170.6 mm8.7 mm
- Helio G99 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- v10 411.900
- 6000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 12 Snow Cone HiOS 8.6 (Android 12)
User score
- 10
- 4
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.7
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Performance & Hardware
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Camera
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Connectivity
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 14%One day
- 57%More than one day
- 29%Two days or more
15 reviews
Software
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 86%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
15 reviews
- 15%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 62%Every six months
- 23%Every two months or less
15 reviews
User reviews
- AutoFor gaming, this is the best phone for its price.
Great gaming phone for the price. Helio g99 and 6000mAh make it playable and the 90Hz screen is also good. I'm not happy with the camera and the 18W charger, but it's a decent device
Pros- CPU
- Screen
- Battery
- Sound
- Design
Cons- Camera
- Charger
- Material quality
View original review- 8.4
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe phone is worth the money
Recently, before the New Year, I decided to pay for my phone, I saw that Tecno pova 4 was on sale at a discount and did not regret that I bought it. The pros are the 90 screen, which I wish was amoled, the helio g99 processor, which performs well in games, the 6000 mAh battery, which I’m very happy about, the battery lasts for a day or more. There are no downsides to the person only if the camera, it’s just there to expect something better from it, it’s not worth it, it’s more of a gaming phone for $125
Pros- CPU
- Design
- Battery
Cons- Camera
- Screen
View original review- 8
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoPowerful, excellent and good looking
It has a good design, with a good battery, as I use it a little hard it lasts a little more than a day, but it can last more or less depending on the type of user. The cameras are quite decent, with rear and front flash. A nice screen, it captures everything, but the resolution could improve a little.
Pros- Battery
- Processor
- Performance
- Sound
- 5Ghz Wi-Fi
Cons- Charger (Not a bad thing, but can improve)
View original review- 7.1
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoRecommended for a normal user
The only thing I didn't like is the screen because your finger already detects it without even touching the screen (ghost touch only when the phone is cold), and the Wi-Fi quality is low
Pros- Battery
- stereo sound
- Performance
- RAM
- Storage
Cons- Screen
- connectivity
- low screen resolution
- Bug in the system
View original review- 8
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery10
View answers - AutoThe best cell phone I've tried
Excellent phone, better than many cell phones I've seen and although it has a low score in Antutu, I feel that it beats many with higher scores that are not as good as the little f4, so I really recommend it
Pros- Battery
- Performance
- Storage
- Screen
Cons- Burden
View original review- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoGood mobile if you just want and nothing else to play
In fact it is a very good and beautiful mobile. My only complaint is that in the operating system you cannot choose the temperature of the screen. But otherwise beautiful, although in the ultra night photo mode it does lose quality enormously
Pros- Your processor
- Its huge battery
- screen size
- tactile feedback
- night mode
Cons- slow charge
- somewhat complicated operating system
View original review- 9.2
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 10
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- Features 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Market, Camera, Photos 1 year ago
- Weight, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
- Storage 1 year ago
- Usable surface, SIM card, SIM card, SIM card, Battery Composition 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 1 year ago
- Camera, Camera, Camera, Fast charge, Aspect Ratio, Resolution, Flash, Screen Type, Sensor Type, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Fingerprint, Photos 1 year ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.4 Design & Materials
- 6.8 Performance & Hardware
- 5.3 Camera
- 5.9 Connectivity
- 8.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.