you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Tecno Pova 5 Pro reviews by real users Tecno Pova 5 Pro
- "Ki" Value for Money ScoreNo price,
no Ki - Pros
- Fast charge
- Design
Cons- Camera quality
- Price
- Slow SOC
- 6.78"LCD IPSFHD+21:9
- 220 g76.5 mm168.5 mm9.0 mm
- Dimensity 6080 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 448.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 68 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.7 2 0.3 Mpx Unknow SELF 16 Mpx · Unknow
- Android 13 Tiramisu HiOS 13 (Android 13)
User reviews
User score
- 12
- 7
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.2
- Camera7.1
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery6.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe it's a very good phone for its price, highlighting its value for money and its performance in mid-range games. They appreciate its design, LED lights, and fast charging, although there are mixed opinions on its long-term durability.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen offers good resolution and 120Hz. However, being LCD/IPS and not AMOLED, some criticize its brightness and quality.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for medium-consumption games, without overheating. However, some consider the processor improvable and note a possible decrease after months of use.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are decent for the price and in good light. However, their performance in low light is a weak point.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is generally good, although some experience poor network coverage and occasional signal drops.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the 5000mAh battery and its 68W fast charging are fantastic, although some note variable duration and a reduction in capacity.
- 0%Less than half day
- 32%Less than a day
- 47%One day
- 21%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
19 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 82%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 12%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
19 reviews
- 8%Never
- 15%Once a year
- 62%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
19 reviews
- Gaming phone low-budget, good fast charging, cool ambient light on the back, loud speaker (can setting), 50/50 performance (games)
Not very decent enough for heavy games but still running in low graphics. Lack on optimizing its FPS for certain games like Roblox, why Roblox's limit need to be 60 FPS and it dropped 27 FPS while I'm playing? But thinking back this is low budget so I have no words for it
Pros- Speaker
- 1080p 60 FPS Video
- Can play mid-end games (MOBA, Genshin, PUBG etc.)
- Resolution
- Fast Charging 68W
- Security I guess
Cons- Heavy games
- Game optimization not satisfied
- Ultra Power Saver
- Hard to find the custom casing
- The back gets dirty (hard to remove)
- 7.4
- Screen7.3
- Performance6.6
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - It's a solid phone for the price
It nice and snappy doesn't get hot and runs on max settings at least for the games I use it for (punishing grey raven and blood strike), I like it's features such as bypass charging and game temperature control etc, the app animation's are lovely, the cameras are good with virtually no noise though the 50mp mode has some noise though has greater detail and I would have liked an optical zoom sensor otherwise it's good and the selfie camera is good too, night mode is good aswell.
Pros- The performance is nice
- The display is good
- The speakers are good
- Doesn't get hot
- Charges rather quickly
- The light are nice but aren't useful for me
Cons- Optical zoom would be nice
- 9.8
- Screen9.6
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoWell
It's good, but don't expect a lot of power. For light gaming and the camera, it performs very well; a good phone for its price in 2023.
Pros- Fast charging
- 3.1mm Jack
- Stereo audio
- It does the job for the price.
Cons- It could have had a better camera
- Battery
- Screen
- Better building material
View original review- 7.5
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's a good phone for occasional use and runs less demanding or high-quality games well; its fast charging is a +10.
It's not a phone for someone who demands a lot for its price, and I haven't had any software or other problems. What is a problem, though, is the restriction on altering my files (copying and pasting).
Pros- Its fast charging
- His camera
- Its design
- It has good resistance
Cons- It overheats
- Battery life
- Performance issues in games
View original review- 7.2
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt is a good cell phone that withstands falls and water, but being a plastic cover it is more prone to scratches.
It's a good phone for gaming, with good cameras and audio speakers, but Android 15 hasn't arrived for the device yet.
Pros- Performance
- Fluids
- Weight
- Camera
Cons- Plastic lid
- Screen
View original review- 8.8
- Screen7.0
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoFor a budget employee it's normal.
So, the phone is pretty good. I've been using it for almost a year, haven't seen any problems. It handles games more or less well, on medium settings. It heats up to 43°C maximum. What about the camera? The camera itself is bad, but if you install gcam, it's not bad. If you know how to take photos, you can do it on any smartphone. Design. Perfect, the plastic back cover looks like glass, the backlight pleases the eye. Beautiful. I charge it twice a day, since I play quite often. The 68-watt charger is great, but it could have been better. What can I say in conclusion: the phone is more or less good for everyday use. You can play undemanding games.
Pros- Design
- Charger
- Performance
Cons- Camera
- The processor could be better
View original review- 7.6
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Features 2 years ago
- On Sale 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Aliases, Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Operating System, Processor, Flash, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Photos, Photos 2 years ago
- Density 2 years ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge 2 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.9 Design & Materials
- 6.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.0 Camera
- 7.4 Connectivity
- 6.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
