you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Tecno Pova 6 reviews by real users Tecno Pova 6
- "Ki" Value for Money ScoreNo price,
no Ki - Pros
- Battery
- Fast charge
Cons- Price
- Slow SOC
- System lag
- 6.78"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 198 g76.8 mm166.2 mm7.9 mm
- Helio G99 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 448.000 v10
- 6000 mAh 70 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.7 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 3 -- ƒ/-- SELF 32 Mpx · Unknow
- Android 14 Upside-down cake HiOS 14 (Android 14)
User reviews
User score
- 6
- 7
- 4
- 1
- 0
- Screen7.3
- Performance6.8
- Camera6.6
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery7.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a very good mid-range mobile, highlighting its excellent value for money and attractive design, especially for gamers. They deem it suitable for daily use and less demanding games. However, some report occasional lagging issues and criticize the operating system interface.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120 Hz AMOLED screen is of good quality and offers a positive visual experience, although the fingerprint reader may fail with screen protectors.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and acceptable in games with medium graphics. Although the processor falls short, the RAM helps, but occasional lags are reported.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Camera
According to our users, photos are of good quality and the flash is useful. However, the night camera, video, and zoom need improvement.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is good, highlighting the inclusion of NFC and an infrared port, features that are positively valued.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, offering great autonomy and 70W fast charging. However, there is an isolated opinion that considers it deficient.
- 0%Less than half day
- 17%Less than a day
- 39%One day
- 39%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
18 reviews
Software
- 17%It comes with a clean operating system
- 67%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 17%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
18 reviews
- 0%Never
- 15%Once a year
- 54%Every six months
- 31%Every two months or less
18 reviews
- AutoIt's an acceptable phone for the price, but you can't expect too much from it.
Its only noteworthy points are: Its value for money is very decent for the price. And the screen offers good colors and a good refresh rate. In other aspects, it's fairly average; it won't let you down, but it won't excel in anything demanding either.
Pros- Screen
- Quality for the price
Cons- Operating system
- Updates
View original review- 7
- Screen8.0
- Performance4.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt's a good phone, it takes good photos, and it's also very fluid; the phone meets mid-range standards.
It's a good mid-range phone. It runs some games well on medium settings, and some on high settings. With a 108-megapixel camera and a 120Hz AMOLED screen, and a 32-pixel screen, it's a good phone for the price, which is 336,000 Argentine pesos. The backlight makes it good for gaming. The downside is that it lags a bit, but on the plus side, it performs well for a mid-range phone with medium graphics.
View original review- 7.9
- Screen6.5
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoFor a phone with such a low price it gives a lot, if the price were higher I would still buy it because it is worth it,
Both the phone and the customization and other premium things that I found in a mid-range phone, it works very well, the fingerprint on the screen with ceramic protective micas is sometimes difficult to read. But in itself everything is fine, would I buy the following series of the Tecno Pova? Yes, but when it catches my attention more, like the Pova 7, which is a little cheaper than the Pova 6, which attracts a lot.
View original review- 9.5
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - 8.9
- Screen7.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoA good phone, missing interface
It is a very good phone, it needs updates and a better interface, it runs smoothly, it is fast, it charges quickly, the battery lasts, it needs a better processor, and the video camera needs to be improved and have more zoom and improve its type of RAM and storage.
Pros- Battery life
- Battery charging
- Photos
- Screen
- Fluency
- Aesthetics
Cons- Video
- Processor
- Zoom
- Interface
- Updates
View original review- 6.5
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.2
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 20 days ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, RAM 1 year ago
- Features 2 years ago
- Usable surface, Resolution, Photos 2 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.7 Design & Materials
- 6.8 Performance & Hardware
- 6.2 Camera
- 6.5 Connectivity
- 7.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
