you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Tecno Spark Go 2024 reviews by real users Tecno Spark Go 2024
- "Ki" Value for Money ScoreNo price,
no Ki - Pros
- Performance
Cons- Camera quality
- Price
- Slow SOC
- System lag
- Sound
- 6.6"LCD IPSHD+21:9
- 206 g75.6 mm163.7 mm8.6 mm
- Unisoc T606 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 64 GB
- 249.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 10 W
- 1 13 Mpx ƒ/1.9 2 0.1 Mpx ƒ/-- SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu HiOS 13 (Android 13)
User reviews
User score
- 4
- 5
- 4
- 6
- 2
- Screen6.0
- Performance4.9
- Camera4.3
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery6.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an entry-level phone with an acceptable price-quality ratio for basic use. They highlight its low cost, but there's a general consensus that it's not suitable for demanding games or for users seeking smooth performance in complex tasks.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 90Hz screen is a positive aspect, offering fluidity, although there are mixed opinions regarding its resolution.
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is adequate for basic tasks, but the processor is insufficient for demanding games, leading to lags.
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is one of its weakest points, with generally poor quality, especially in night and front-facing photos.
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, the stereo speakers and sound quality are good. However, the operating system (Android Go) limits functions and app compatibility.
21 reviews
21 reviews
21 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is a strong point, offering good autonomy for a day of use, even when gaming, although some report the opposite.
- 10%Less than half day
- 33%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 19%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
21 reviews
Software
- 5%It comes with a clean operating system
- 65%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 30%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
21 reviews
- 16%Never
- 5%Once a year
- 53%Every six months
- 26%Every two months or less
21 reviews
- A decent budget-friendly phone with bad camera but above average performance
The front and back camera quality is pure garbage — Game performance is average, it can play CODM, MLBB, LOL, PUBG, FREE FIRE, and other Fps games smoothly; but when it comes to open world rpg games like Genshin Impact, it's unplayable. Maximum of 60fps.
Pros- Cheap
- Performance
Cons- Camera
- 4
- Screen6.2
- Performance6.0
- Camera1.7
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoThis thing is worse than shitting rocks.Pros
- Withstands falls
- And it's a pocket toaster
Cons- It's a piece of diarrhea, the worst thing ever created. It freezes as soon as you turn it on, a total piece of crap. And in video games, even a stupid cube game is more laggy than a pirated Chinese phone. It beats this piece of garbage. If you're thinking
View original review- 1.3
- Screen4.5
- Performance0.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity0.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoVery good depending on who uses it
I've had this phone for two years and my experience has been very good and comfortable. I don't usually play demanding games (I only play Bloodstrike, Terraria, Roblox, and Minecraft). The camera quality is acceptable for its price range. What bothers me is that it only has Android 13 Go Edition, which I find frustrating because I can't do certain things or install certain apps or games. But putting that aside, the Tecno Spark Go 2024 is a very well-made phone for its price. If you modify it a little, believe me, you'll get excellent performance.
Pros- Performance (only if you modify)
- The battery lasts a whole day.
- The 90Hz screen is amazing
- Good system optimization
- The sensors are good, but it doesn't have a gyroscope.
- Its stereo speakers
Cons- Very short operating system
- Many layers of customization
- It can cause frostbite with prolonged daily use.
- The camera is acceptable but not of professional quality.
View original review- 7.6
- Screen6.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoAn excellent phone for its price
A good phone for its price, but bad at demanding games, low storage. I liked that it had a microSD card slot, perfect for normal use, but the processor is bad, the camera is bad, and it can freeze on TikTok sometimes.
Pros- Excellent for everyday use
Cons- Bad processor
View original review- 6.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance3.0
- Camera1.7
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoNot good for games
I've had this type of device for two years. The design isn't very good; in fact, it's ugly. It only has one camera, and the bottom one is just for show. It's a slow phone, and the processor doesn't help, but it has managed to handle games like Blood Strike, Devil May Cry, and PS2 and PSP emulator games. It's fine for everyday use, but it's not suitable for demanding tasks.
Pros- Speakers
- Support apps
- Soft play
Cons- Slow
- Cameras
- Processor
View original review- 5.6
- Screen5.2
- Performance4.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 2.9
- Screen4.0
- Performance2.3
- Camera1.7
- Connectivity3.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 10 days ago
- Pros & Cons 5 months ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Selfie Camera 2 years ago
- Camera 2 years ago
- Camera 2 years ago
- Sensor Model 2 years ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.6 Design & Materials
- 5.5 Performance & Hardware
- 5.6 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 6.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
