Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 0%Less than half day
- 11%Less than a day
- 21%One day
- 58%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
- 42%It comes with a clean operating system
- 58%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 7%Once a year
- 40%Every six months
- 13%Every two months or less
- Good but some flaws
Unripe software, even if stock
Good construction, materials and design
Good feeling (but sometimes the touch is "very slow", very ugly)
Good display and GPS and connectivity
So-so camera (day 7/10 night 5.5/10 (video better)), the second camera is not used
Battery just barely (I think not optimized software, my note 4x doubles with 4100 mAh)
Missing update (December 2017: last update August!)
Overall, it's worth the money spent, but there is betterPositives
- design and costruction
- Daily use
- Software and update
- I would recommend it to anyone who is not given much money for other famous brands.
Good phone for this price.Positives
- very good bat.
- good materials
- a good phone feel
- fast boot, works well,actually matches the descrip
- ligth sensor compared to my old lumi 640 xl
- nigth photos
- Great device lacks perfect touches
Great design and luxury
Camera is pretty good
Generally the device can be described
Something luxurious but not completePositives
- network band
- It does not work with fitness programs
- AutoGood machine, improvable camera
Powerful hardware, good fluidity, image quality and the battery lasts more than a day. The camera is very bad. During the day he takes mediocre photos and at night he does not give up with a pin. It does not focus well and all blurry. It's a shame, because I'm going to have to change my phone because of the low quality of the photos.Positives
- AutoPowerful and light mobile with very clean software.
It is a great mobile for the price you have with a very clean Android (no forced interfaces as happens with the Xiaomi). After 8 months of use it gives 66,000 Antutu points even though I have it full of apps, music, videos and photos both in the SD and in the internal memory. The only downside that I see is that it costs the codec H.265, especially at the beginning of the video, once 30 seconds pass it goes fluid.Positives
- Performance-price ratio
- Codec H.265
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 5.6 Performance & Hardware
- 4.8 Camera
- 4.5 Connectivity
- 5.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.