you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
vivo iQOO Neo10 reviews by real users vivo iQOO Neo10
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.6
- Pros
- Battery
- Powerfull SOC
- Display quality
- Selfie camera
Cons- Bloatware on system
- Camera quality
- 6.78"AMOLEDUHD20:9
- 206 g75.4 mm162.9 mm8.1 mm
- SnapD. 8 Gen3 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 2.341.117 v11
- 6100 mAh 120 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.88 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 15 OriginOS 5 (Android 15)
User reviews
User score
- 15
- 1
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.4
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.1
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery8.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone is an excellent option for its value for money, highlighting its power and fluidity. However, some express reservations about software optimization and the absence of resistance certifications.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is spectacular, with excellent color and a high refresh rate, although some find it somewhat pale.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is excellent thanks to its powerful processor, ideal for gaming. Some report throttling, overheating, and improvable optimization.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is good in good light, but the wide-angle and front cameras are deficient. Opinions on video vary.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is good, with strong WiFi and 4G signals. However, there are complaints about the lack of band 20 and issues with 5G.
18 reviews
18 reviews
18 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is monstrous, with fantastic autonomy and extremely fast charging. Few miss a soft charging mode.
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 28%One day
- 61%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
18 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 94%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 6%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
18 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 19%Every six months
- 81%Every two months or less
18 reviews
- The best phone for the price on the market
Display is spectacular , front camera is pretty much good , wifi + , speed overall , future updates
Pros- Price.Display.Futures.Connectivity.Fast-Reverse charge...
Cons- Fragile.Selfie.only ip64
- 9.5
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoPowerful, beautiful, cheap.
Hello everyone, I recently got a new phone; before that, I was using the z9 turbo. The difference is definitely noticeable after upgrading to the z9 turbo. There's a bit of throttling and a dip in the 120Hz range, but that's inevitable. I'm happy with the phone and highly recommend it.
Pros- Battery
- Charger
- Screen
- Iron
- Sound for the money
- Origin shell
Cons- Front camera
- Shirik
- Vibration (but it's ok for this budget)
View original review- 10
- Screen10
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 10
- Screen8.5
- Performance10
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoGreat
The phone is very good for its price (26 thousand rubles on Aliexpress) - it has a pretty good main camera, but the wide-angle is very bad, almost a plug. The performance is more than enough, it does not heat up above 45 ° C. The sound is very pleasant (although this is a one and a half, not a full-fledged stereo), loud, clear, in general, top. The screen is generally top, excellent color rendition, contrast, refresh rate. Charging is very fast, in 10 minutes at non-maximum power 25%, at maximum 30%, in general, very fast charging. Although the materials are plastic, it feels very nice, it is not the same plastic as on budget phones, it slips in the hand, but not much. Of the minuses, only Chinese firmware, in which Chinese applications are not translated (well, this is such a minus, personally it does not bother me). If you take in general, then the phone is just top for its money, I advise everyone.
Pros- Sound
- Performance
- Main camera
- Charging speed
- Screen
- Autonomy
Cons- Wide-angle camera
- Materials
- Translation OriginOC
View original review- 10
- Screen8.7
- Performance10
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Screen Type, Features 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Aliases 1 year ago
- Battery Composition, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 7.6 Design & Materials
- 8.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.8 Camera
- 6.8 Connectivity
- 8.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
