you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ reviews by real users Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.4
- Pros
- Battery
- Performance
Cons- Camera quality
- Price
- Overheating
- 6.78"AMOLEDWQHD+20:9
- 196 g75.9 mm163.7 mm8.0 mm
- Dimensity 9300+ Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 2.348.905 v11
- 6400 mAh 80 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 14 Upside-down cake OriginOS 4 (Android 14)
User reviews
User score
- 8
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.7
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.4
- Battery9.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an excellent "flagship killer" with unbeatable value for money, ideal for gamers and enthusiasts. They highlight its power and fluidity. Although its Chinese operating system generates mixed opinions, many accept it for its outstanding performance.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 144Hz AMOLED screen is very fluid, sharp, and vibrant. The absence of LTPO is a minor drawback.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is exceptional thanks to its powerful processor, ideal for gaming. Some report overheating and performance drops.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are decent during the day but don't stand out. Night photography and the ultra-wide angle are its weaknesses.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, Wi-Fi 6.0 connectivity is very good. Despite being a Chinese version, internet reception is surprisingly effective.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, with a record-breaking autonomy of more than a day. Its fast charging is impressive.
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 9%One day
- 55%More than one day
- 36%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 55%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 45%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
11 reviews
- Very good flagship killer
I pay rm1755(usd395) for the phone with 12+512 variant. My priorities was price>performance>battery>charging speed>camera>quality of life.
This phone fits the bill. The performance very good i can play highest setting without stuttering or lag. My sot past 5 months is 11hrs(moderate gaming session)-14hrs(video streaming, gps navigation, web browsing) i only charge the phone 3x for 2days. Charging 0-100 takes 50 min. 30 min charge can get 69 percent. Camera is just good on day time. Night photography is sub par. Satisfied with the built quality despite plastic frame and back 1 less worry for cracking. Ip65 good enough can endure mild rain while on motorcycle's phone holder. I wouldn't try dropping under water nor let it be when rain got heavyPros- Battery life
- Performance
- Charging
- UI
Cons- AI
- Camera
- "4500 nits"
- 9
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers - 8
- Screen8.0
- Performance9.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- 9.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- AutoI liked the phone
It's a good phone; I bought it for 21,000 rubles, and it's a very good phone for the price. It handles all kinds of games, and it's great for everyone. The cameras aren't exactly the best, but they're okay. It's more of a gaming phone than a camera phone. Overall, I like the phone and it's perfect for everyday use.
Pros- Performance
Cons- Front camera
View original review- 8.7
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe best there is for its price
I don't understand why people lower their ratings because of the quality of the connection, they buy the Chinese version UNDERSTANDING that there will be some bands missing. But even despite this, the Internet works better than the phones of the global version.
View original review- 10
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Features 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Aliases 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Screen Type, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Flash, Camera, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Battery Composition, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 7.4 Design & Materials
- 8.3 Performance & Hardware
- 7.3 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 8.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
