you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
vivo X Fold reviews by real users vivo X Fold
- 6.53"AMOLEDFHD+21:9
- 311 g74.5 mm162.0 mm14.9 mm
- SnapD. 8 Gen1 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 1.046.800 v10
- 4600 mAh 66 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.57 2 48 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 12 Mpx ƒ/1.98 4 8 Mpx ƒ/3.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 12 Snow Cone OriginOS (Android 12)
User reviews
User score
- Screen8.6
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.4
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
- valid alternative to fold samsungPros
- 2 large amoled displays
- overall performances
- internal display over 8''
- Vivo UI different but pleasant, improved over time
Cons- too heavy
- decent battery but no further
- decent audio in call but no further
- pricey
- 8.5
- Screen7.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.3
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoA more than valid alternative to the monotony of more renowned brands.
The smartphone is powerful, responsive, with 2 spectacular amoled displays, the internal one is the most beautiful screen I've ever seen on a portable device. Finally a high-level camera on a foldable, stunning audio output and reception of the terminal, never loses field indeed it covers, even if it is a Chinese version, much better than terminals released globally. The battery is, according to personal use, excellent ... Considering that I spent the day despite having the internal screen always in use. The weight, the software to take advantage of a still unripe mutitasking and the audio in capsule, good but not excellent, can be improved.
Pros- The best displays ever seen on a smartphone. Top hardware and first-class cameras. Excellent audio output.
Cons- Terminal weight, software in
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.3
- Performance10
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- Version 3 years ago
- On Sale, Name, Aliases, AnTuTu, Fast charge, Processor, Features 3 years ago
- New opinion 3 years ago
- Usable surface 4 years ago
- Fingerprint 4 years ago
- Storage 4 years ago
- Capacity (mAh), Photos, Photos 4 years ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Screen Type, Resolution, Density, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Operating System, Screen Type, Camera, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Battery Composition 4 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.9 Design & Materials
- 7.1 Performance & Hardware
- 8.3 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 5.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
