you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Xiaomi 17 Ultra reviews by real users Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- "Ki" Value for Money Score9.1
- EfficiencyAGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Display quality
Cons- Bloatware on system
- Weight
- Charging Speed
- 6.9"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 218 g77.6 mm162.9 mm8.3 mm
- SnapD. 8 Elite G5 Octa-Core 16 GB RAM 512 GB
- 4.027.702 v11
- 6000 mAh 90 W ~ 63h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.65 2 50 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 200 Mpx ƒ/2.39-2.96 SELF 50 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 17 HyperOS 3.X (Android 17)
User reviews
User score
- 12
- 3
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.2
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery7.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an excellent and powerful smartphone, an ultra-high-end device. They highlight its premium design and overall quality. However, there are criticisms regarding the software and its high price, leading to mixed opinions on its value for money.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the AMOLED screen is spectacular, with very well-achieved colors, excellent brightness, and high resolution.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is impeccable and fluid, even in demanding games. Opinions on HyperOS are varied; some see it as improved, while others criticize its weight.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is elite, excelling in both daytime and nighttime photography. However, opinions on the AI, video quality, and selfie camera are varied.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is solid. They highlight the audio quality, speakers, and microphone, generally considering them excellent.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers varied autonomy; some find it excellent, while others consider it short for its capacity. Fast charging is highly valued.
- 0%Less than half day
- 31%Less than a day
- 6%One day
- 44%More than one day
- 19%Two days or more
16 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 63%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 31%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
16 reviews
- 7%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 43%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
16 reviews
- Excellent Phone !
Its an Ultra device which should be an example for Samsung or Apple how to produce a phone ! For zoom and daylight pictures i use Xiaomi App but for night pictures without zoom i use Gcam. Pictures and Videos are brilliant. Microphone and speaker are the best i ever had. It has bloatware but 95% can be deleted and the rest deactivated. Battery is super good if you dont play games 2 days and if playing 1 day easy. Charging i would love if the put 120W but 90W is still fast enough and faster than Apple/Samsung. The weight is perfectly balanced despite having a big camera bump, you can still balance the phone with one finger in the middle and thats awesome ! I use the phone since Januar 2026 (CN Version) and i am absolute happy
Pros- Camera
- Battery
- Screen
- Speakers
- Microphone
- Charging
Cons- EU price
- 120W is missing
- 10
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - It's a truly excellent device. I recently had the chance to review it and I'm very pleased with the results.
When it first came out, I was disappointed that it only had three cameras, but the device really appeals to users with its extremely advanced features. It has a rather bland appearance, but it's a true beast; every time I look at it, it reminds me of my old Mi 11 Ultra. Currently, I use the 15 Ultra and 17 Ultra, and I think there are huge differences between them.
Pros- not thick
- beautiful and sexy appearance
- box content is nice
Cons- passive view
- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery10
View answers - Autoa very nice phone
A good, fairly powerful smartphone that takes nice photos, although I think it needs to be better understood as the AI still does some strange things. The battery lasts well with my usage; I charge it every other day most of the time, except when I'm literally spending way too much time on the phone. The settings could be made easier; sometimes you type a setting with a keyword into the search bar and it doesn't find it, whereas when you search for it manually, it's there with the same keyword in the settings. The camera package is really gimmicky; I expected better.
Pros- power
- The photos, even though I find them restrictive, are a plus.
Cons- The sound is clearly inferior to my old 11t pro
- the flash
- and the ease of navigating the settings
View original review- 8.4
- Screen7.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoSomething is missing
A top-of-the-range phone with its flaws. What I appreciate most is its camera, which rivals its top competitors, and the screen, with its vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in bright sunlight—a pleasant surprise. I saw some complaints about the battery, which, at 6,000 mAh, seemed a bit lacking, and it's true that it doesn't even last me a day. I know I'm a demanding user because of my job. But a phone costing over €1,000 should offer more than just a 6,000 mAh battery. At the very least, the operating system needs better optimization. We all know Xiaomi's interface, which unfortunately comes with some pre-installed apps, but they're not intrusive and can be easily uninstalled. The problem lies in its optimization and how it falls behind other competitors.
Pros- Screen
- Fast charging
- Cameras
Cons- Botware
View original review- 7.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoPerhaps perfection has not been achieved
The phone runs smoothly in everyday use, the camera is good, but the problem arises when you actually use it like a normal person. The focus you get from marketing is disappointing when you actually need it. Perhaps I've been too demanding lately, testing it in situations where maybe no phone performs well at night, but I think it could be better. The selfie camera is literally mid-range; for the price, it's bad. The operating system continues to consume too many resources, and the battery drains very quickly, reaching a minimum of 10 hours, so the 6000mAh capacity isn't that great. I haven't noticed any problems with the screen quality, but in DPI and screen tests, it only shows 1440p.
Pros- Screen
- 100W fast charging
- Connectivity
- Day Cameras
- Bluetooth calls
- Audio
Cons- DPI
- HyperOS
- Battery (Global Version)
- It gets dirty very quickly. Factory protectors.
- Price
- Selfie and Night Quality
View original review- 9.1
- Screen9.0
- Performance10
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Version 1 month ago
- Aliases 4 months ago
- Name, Storage 4 months ago
- Bluetooth, Capacity (mAh), Sensor Model, SIM card, SIM card, Features 4 months ago
- Weight, Market, RAM 4 months ago
- Pros & Cons 5 months ago
- AnTuTu 6 months ago
- Camera 6 months ago
- Camera 6 months ago
Score
- 8.9 Design & Materials
- 9.3 Performance & Hardware
- 8.9 Camera
- 9.5 Connectivity
- 8.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
