9.0

Xiaomi Redmi K70 reviews by real users Xiaomi Redmi K70

Summary

User score

Overall satisfaction
9.4
  • 5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
5 reviews
  • Screen9.1
  • Performance9.8
  • Camera9.3
  • Connectivity9.7
  • Battery6.6
Want to comment on the Xiaomi Redmi K70?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
8.0

5 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
10.0

5 reviews

Is it comfortable?
9.8

5 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
8.4

5 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
9.4

5 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
10.0

5 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
10.0

5 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
9.8

5 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
9.6

5 reviews

Quality of selfies
9.0

5 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
8.8

5 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
9.6

5 reviews

Quality of the GPS
9.8

5 reviews

And the WiFi?
9.8

5 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 20%
    Less than half day
  • 0%
    Less than a day
  • 40%
    One day
  • 20%
    More than one day
  • 20%
    Two days or more

5 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 0%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 80%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 20%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

5 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 0%
    Never
  • 0%
    Once a year
  • 0%
    Every six months
  • 100%
    Every two months or less

5 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Amazing phone for gaming

    • 9.4
    • Screen9.2
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera9.2
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • 4000 nits? Are you kidding me ?

    4000 nits?....4000 nits ?.......this phone have 4000 nits..
    This is one of my solid reason why I bought this Redmi.
    How disappointed I am with the 4000 nits screen brightness peak...I'm really disappointed...word can't describe....
    I could not bother other imperfection thing on this phone...

    I have vivo with 1200 nits ...I compare them side by side
    Redmi with 4000 nits....you know what it's like?
    It like Redmi just add max 1000 nits only !!!!
    It's like Redmi is 2200 nits ..I'm comparing side by side...
    It's like Redmi is 2200 nits...what ??..where is the rest?
    I really hope others who buys this Redmi give me a comment about how similar your experience is...

    • 9.6
    • Screen8.3
    • Performance10
    • Camera10
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery0.0
  • Good Specs and Display and Battery // Poor Camera No IP Ratings and No Google Services

    Bought the White 16/256Gb version few days ago from a Online vendor in China.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Very Good Display Quality and Colors with a 12 Bits panel and Dolby Vision.
    Top notch Peak Brightness.
    Powerful Processor and Spec overall.
    Good Battery Life.
    120W Fast Charge.
    Hypers OS on Android 14 is very Smooth.
    ---------------------------------------------
    "OK" grade main Camera in this Price Range.
    Mediocre Wide Camera.
    Poor Macro Camera.
    No IP Rating.
    4G Coverage is not Very Good.
    No Google Services On it.

    Pros
    • Powerful SOC
    • Display Quality
    • Display Brightness
    • Hyper OS
    Cons
    • Poor Macro Camera
    • Mediocre Wide Camera
    • "OK" grade main Camera for the Price
    • No IP Rating
    • No Google Services
    • 4G Coverage
    • 9
    • Screen9.0
    • Performance9.6
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity8.6
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Pretty good cell phone runs smoothly

    It has good specifications but the problem comes in the cameras, the macro is too short, possibly even the Redmi 9 surpasses it and the wide angle is in the middle, neither very bad nor very good. For everything else, the phone performs quite well and therefore its price I think it is a phone to take into account

    Pros
    • Power
    • Main camera not very good but somewhat decent
    • Fluency
    • Screen
    • Not the best sound but ok
    Cons
    • Horrible Macro
    • Regular Wide Angle
    • 9.6
    • Screen9.2
    • Performance10
    • Camera9.0
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    EE

    FF

    • 9.5
    • Screen9.5
    • Performance10
    • Camera10
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery10

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
April 3, 2024
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 28 days ago
  • Pros & Cons 4 months ago
  • Camera 5 months ago
  • Version 5 months ago
  • Sensor Model 5 months ago
  • Aliases 5 months ago
  • Name, Storage 5 months ago
  • RAM 5 months ago
  • Features 5 months ago
  • AnTuTu, Photos, Photos 5 months ago
9.0
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 7.8 Design & Materials
  • 8.9 Performance & Hardware
  • 7.8 Camera
  • 7.1 Connectivity
  • 7.6 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.