6.0

ZTE Blade A5 2020 reviews by real users ZTE Blade A5 2020

User score

Overall satisfaction
6.2
  • 2
  • 7
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
15 reviews
  • Screen6.8
  • Performance5.6
  • Camera5.4
  • Connectivity6.9
  • Battery5.3
Want to comment on the ZTE Blade A5 2020?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
6.8

15 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
7.2

15 reviews

Is it comfortable?
7.9

15 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
5.3

15 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
5.1

15 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
6.6

15 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
5.2

15 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
6.1

15 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
4.0

15 reviews

Quality of selfies
5.9

15 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
5.7

15 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
6.9

15 reviews

Quality of the GPS
6.6

15 reviews

And the WiFi?
7.1

15 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 27%
    Less than half day
  • 20%
    Less than a day
  • 27%
    One day
  • 20%
    More than one day
  • 7%
    Two days or more

15 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 0%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 73%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 27%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

15 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 33%
    Never
  • 25%
    Once a year
  • 17%
    Every six months
  • 25%
    Every two months or less

15 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Auto
    Before good now bad

    Before you could pull apps and games here very heavy but time does not go in vain and now it is slower than a turtle, the cameras look like those of the security of the colony, its sound is like a Fisher Price baby toy, apart from the fact that it is almost inaudible, it has a screen like those of the bank ATMs, it does not have a fingerprint and Android 9 is already becoming obsolete.

    Pros
    • Jack 3.5 mm
    • Price
    • FM Radio
    Cons
    • Without a fingerprint
    • No updates
    • Sound
    • Performance
    • Screen
    • Telcel Bloatware (In Mexico)
    • 3.1
    • Screen6.2
    • Performance3.0
    • Camera3.5
    • Connectivity4.6
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Once regular, now garbage

    In its time it performed well, now a quadriplegic tortoise runs faster than this thing, an ATM has a better screen than this mother, a vtech baby toy sounds better than this thing, the security camera in the neighborhood is better quality than this thing and an old man with Alzheimer's is more functional than this thing. Honestly, in its first year it was 10/10, because it didn't crash and had enough functions, but it's been five years since it came out (I've had it for three) and time took its toll.

    Pros
    • Connectivity
    • Design
    • 3.5 Jack
    • Basic performance
    Cons
    • Demanding performance
    • Screen
    • Camera
    • Few useful functions
    • 5.6
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera2.5
    • Connectivity4.6
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Admission - price - accessibility

    It only has to have a moderately stable performance during the day, not recommended for games and photographs

    Pros
    • Notification light
    • facial recognition
    Cons
    • Processor
    • RAM
    • slow charging
    • Camera
    • Battery
    • Design
    • 4.5
    • Screen5.5
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera4.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    It is a basic cell phone

    Honestly, if you are a person who only uses social networks, it will be a good phone, but if you want it to play games, it is not a good option, it is good with basic games, not for demanding games, because it will not go smoothly or as a joke, but yes You use it for basic things, it's a good option. I've been using it for 2 years, it's not good or very bad.

    Pros
    • Has a headphone jack
    • It's economic
    • It's pretty in my opinion
    • Is not very big
    • facial recognition
    Cons
    • the processor
    • Not so good photos
    • The speaker is in the back, you can't hear it very well.
    • Battery
    • 4.3
    • Screen5.7
    • Performance2.6
    • Camera4.3
    • Connectivity5.3
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Good mobile, but with certain ailments and tricks, such as failing a bit with connectivity in WhatsApp (?)

    Good camera, weak battery. Not very good connectivity at times, for some unknown reason. Cute or more or less cute sounds to choose from notifications and calls. Handy, good colors and definition. Good storage capacity and fast processor.

    Pros
    • Good screen and colors. Agile.
    Cons
    • Battery that doesn't last long.
    • 6.8
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity6.6
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Good value for money, but no longer functional

    Today this mobile is found at prices that are too tempting, so it may sound good for what it offers; however, nowadays (as a user who has been experimenting with this cell phone for more than a year), I do not consider it a good option and here I will mention my reasons: • BAD ASPECTS - Performance It is not surprising that, for a cell phone of the year 2019, this performance is lousy. You will be able to run too much variety of tasks, games, programs, etc. But soon the mobile will come to feel very substandard and even almost obsolete; thus reaching, on occasions, completely frozen in periods that can reach from 2 to 10 seconds. - Camera If I had to describe this aspect in one word it would be "terrible", and that is that every part of it is simply too bad. Bad focus, bad resolution, bad stabilization, bad flash... In short, quite disappointing. - Battery Continuing with the bad, the battery is very lame. Not only because of its low capacity, but also because of its low load. In addition, in the system information it usually shows data such as that the battery is capable of lasting 36 hours. when in reality it doesn't even last a sixth of this. The "Battery Saver" mode doesn't make much of a difference, while the "Ultra Battery Saver" mode does its job better, but the latter limits the system quite a bit, so it's not as convenient. • GOOD ASPECTS - DISPLAYThere may be a big contradiction here because it is an IPS LCD panel, however, the fact that it has this type of screen makes it more resistant, not to mention that it does not make much difference in a low light environment. Under the sun is where it falls far short of AMOLED or OLED panels, however if you're not that picky about this aspect (like me) then you won't be bothered by this aspect. In conclusion, for its price it is complete madness. If what you are looking for is a cheap but durable mobile, this is the best option.

    Pros
    • Screen
    • Price
    Cons
    • Camera
    • Performance
    • Battery
    • 7
    • Screen5.5
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera3.0
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    good phone

    • 7.3
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera4.6
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Not recommendable

    As much as they give you this mobile, return it. The worst experience I've ever had with a cell phone. It's slow, ugly and the battery dies in 2 or 3 hours of minimum use. Not recommended or as a gift for a child or an elderly public because of its cost, I think there are better options.

    Pros
    • Cheap
    • At least it works to call
    Cons
    • Drums
    • cameras
    • Power
    • RAM
    • Design
    • Screen
    • 0.6
    • Screen1.5
    • Performance0.3
    • Camera2.7
    • Connectivity3.3
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    It is a good mobile that does not fail me at all.

    What stood out in this cell phone is that it has not failed me in anything or in work since it works well for that, but what surprised me the most was its fluidity and its battery, the cell phone has not failed me in anything and if I highly recommend for those reasons that it is very smooth in heavy games and the battery lasts almost all day.

    Pros
    • Battery
    • its fluency
    • Your 32GB storage is sometimes 64GB
    • Ram 2
    • Your camera
    • The pixels and the quality of the screen
    Cons
    • I have not seen any problem
    • 10
    • Screen10
    • Performance10
    • Camera9.5
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    It is a decent phone for its price

    Pros
    • 64 GB storage
    Cons
    • Battery
    • Audio
    • The lack of any fingerprint reader
    • 7.1
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera6.7
    • Connectivity8.6
    • Battery7.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
October 1, 2024
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 11 days ago
  • AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
  • AnTuTu 2 years ago
6.0
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 4.9 Design & Materials
  • 4.8 Performance & Hardware
  • 4.9 Camera
  • 4.8 Connectivity
  • 4.8 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.