you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
ZTE V5 Red Bull reviews by real users ZTE V5 Red Bull
- 5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 165 g71.0 mm139.0 mm8.9 mm
- SnapD. 400 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 4 GB
- v? 17.865
- 2400 mAh
- 1 12.8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 Exmor SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.3 Jelly Bean
User score
- Screen8.8
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.9
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Performance & Hardware
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Camera
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Connectivity
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
4 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
4 reviews
- 50%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
4 reviews
User reviews
- AutoWell kept the battery, sometimes for two days stretched
By design as a brick, nothing is straight unique, but qualitatively assembled. The camera for that time and price segment was very surprised.
Pros- Excellent battery consumption optimization
- camera
- very thick and strong protective glass
Cons- weak volume rocker broke during the year
View original review- 9.2
- Screen8.7
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt does not work well, it hangs up with youtube
The microphone is a disaster, at the time of use it does not let me download anything, with free memory, I do not recommend it :( And the jack 3.5 of very poor quality Anyway for that price you can not ask much
Pros- screen
- Cameras when there is light
- Led notification
- Dual Sim and SD
- Resistant
Cons- performance
- Low light camera
- Microphone
- Battery
View original review- 6.4
- Screen8.0
- Performance3.7
- Camera5.3
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoFor the year proved to be a good use
The device is a good, decent build quality, for more than a year is nothing nowhere came off, the cover does not creak. Software stuffing out of the box upset, the translation is not complete, the launcher braked, but quickly decided the third-party firmware, of which enough has quite stable firmware on androyd 5.1.1. Version 1/4 sorely lacking storage for applications, and RAM too. Navigation is beyond praise, very fast cold start, well-kept satellites. First, the battery enough for two days with moderate use, but now the day
Pros- Battery
- The camera is very even, but only on the Runoff firmware
- Navigation - excellent!
- The build quality and strength of the body
Cons- No official update above 4.4
- The quality of communication brings
- The display is visible to the sensor grid in the bright sun
- The firmware is not modified as a whole
View original review- 8.6
- Screen9.3
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.3
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.5
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.