you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Asus ZenFone 3
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 155 g77.4 mm152.6 mm7.7 mm
- SnapD. 625 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v6 62.193
- 3000 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX298 Exmor RS SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow
User score
- 13
- 5
- 0
- 0
- 1
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery6.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Performance & Hardware
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Camera
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Connectivity
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Battery
- 5%Less than half day
- 42%Less than a day
- 21%One day
- 32%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
19 reviews
Software
- 5%It comes with a clean operating system
- 79%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 16%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
19 reviews
- 11%Never
- 21%Once a year
- 68%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
19 reviews
User reviews
- AutoIt's asus
With the excellent experience of the zenfone 5 (a501) I had the opportunity to have the zenfone 3, now with a much more optimized zenui, an excellent chipset, excellent cameras and a very beautiful designer. Its shortcomings were fragility to fall and battery.
Pros- Zenui
- Construction
- Components
- USB-c connector
- cameras
Cons- Weaknesses to falls
- battery consumption
View original review- 8.1
- Screen6.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoPerformance excels after 5 years
The phone itself has a good performance in current applications, even in the most demanding games it is possible to have an acceptable performance, as for falls it is exceptional because when I accidentally throw it at a table, but it hits the wall, it doesn't crack, fell into the water and as incredible as it seemed it also survived, I used the rain because I felt like it and wanted to try it to see if it worked and as incredible as it seems I did not have a headset but the rest continues to work after 5 years, however the rear camera also died I took good pictures from routers passwords to landscapes but died with a lot of pity, but the front camera is amazing to take pictures of notebooks and pictures. As for the system, as I am curious and touched the source code, I corrupted the system, having to install lineage OS 16.0, but I do not regret it because it gave a new life to this armored battle tank that is stronger than the hammer of the tor. Only battery downside.
Pros- Good performance with current apps
- Acceptable performance for demanding games
- Very resistant to falls
- Front camera replaces the rear camera well
- Display with DCI-P3 97.8%
- HI-RES column
Cons- Drums
- Camera stopped focusing (Rear)
View original review- 8.2
- Screen6.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt could be my cell phone today
Look, it's ashamed that certain devices are launched with old ones as good as this one, it still gives a good broth, too bad the screen stopped for good, in fact it wasn't even my first ZenFone, before it I had the first generation ZenFone 5, the device is so absurd that it is borrowed and serving, of course the battery is the weak point, in the face of so much processing, a cell phone over 5 years old is admirable to run current apps. At its launch, the zenui was not so round, it had many bugs, drains the battery easily, I believe the advantage was the defect itself, Intel processing, two different architectures constantly fighting each other, which in ZenFone 3 was very well resolved, well fluid but still with dna zenui, battery drains very fast, but in general some excellent device, exceeded expectations. And a factor that causes controversy, I saw a lot of equipment that is said to be top in photography shame around it, if it had a slightly better lens aperture it would be the king.
Pros- Ergonomics
- Designer
- System
- Camera
- Digital
- Android
Cons- Battery
View original review- 8.3
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGreat phone from a great brand
I took this used phone, but surprised me, battery with 79% health and still doing 7 hours of intense screen in daily life, but in stand by drops to 4hrs (poor optimization). It's a good device for everyday life. I've always had a back foot with asus but that device made me change my mind. It has nothing to do with your troubled older brother (zenfone 2). The 625 processor is great, almost never warms, camera with the gcam apk gets too much show .. After oneplus 3, this is the second best device I've ever had .. Overall of course .. Congratulations asus for making this device mt well done !!!
Pros- Design
- Battery
- Performance
- Camera
Cons- Update
- Fragility
- Sound
View original review- 8.7
- Screen5.5
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood cell phone
The biggest problem is the battery because it does not reach the day, or sometimes or at noon, it is necessary to update it so that it improves a little. Also over time the battery degrades and for how small it is to degrade it does not give you even for half a day. The processor is acceptable for day to day, it is not for heavy video games.
Pros- Camera
- Sound
- Flash
- Design
Cons- Battery
- Bateriaaaa
- Processor
View original review- 8.2
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.