you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Honor 200 Pro reviews by real users Honor 200 Pro
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.6
- Pros
- Powerfull SOC
- Camera quality
- Display quality
Cons- Video quality
- Price
- Poor volume
- 6.78"OledQHD20:9
- 199 g75.2 mm163.3 mm8.2 mm
- SnapD. 8s Gen3 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 512 GB
- 1.782.363 v11
- 5200 mAh 100 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.95 2 12 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 50 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 50 Mpx · ƒ/2.1
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 31
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.9
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this smartphone a "flagship killer" or a high-end device at a mid-range price. They highlight its excellent value for money and balanced performance in almost all aspects. However, some mention a feeling of fragility or improvable ergonomics.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is very good, vibrant, and has excellent brightness. Opinions on the curved screen are mixed.
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is amazing and fluid, even in demanding games, without overheating. Some criticize the use of UFS 3.1.
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the rear cameras are excellent, especially in portrait mode. However, the selfie camera and zoom receive criticism, improving with GCam.
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G reception is excellent. However, there are complaints about call audio quality and inconsistent connectivity.
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, with great durability for more than a day of intense use. Some, however, report inconsistencies.
- 0%Less than half day
- 3%Less than a day
- 32%One day
- 59%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
34 reviews
Software
- 3%It comes with a clean operating system
- 94%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
34 reviews
- 4%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 36%Every six months
- 61%Every two months or less
34 reviews
- Good for price
The screen resolution is not like expected and the quality of colors is little colder
Pros- Design (curve screen)
- Performance
- Calls coverage
- Camera (portrait)
- Fast charge (100w)
- Magic OS 10 (smoth and full with AI services)
Cons- Screen resolution
- Colors degree
- Battery capacity (5200mah)
- 9.4
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - A flagship phone disguised as a mid-tier phone.
Well, I've been using it for a year,
The phone is really good for everyday use; it's even good in games.
The camera is legitimately good, but if something is moving or your hand is shaking, it won't take that good a picture. You need to enable the sport mode, or else it will be blurry.
The Honor 200 Pro can also be considered very durable. I have dropped it a ton of times and it seems fine, with no dents at all, but of course, I use a case.
The battery is also good, considering they are using carbon LiPo.
Oh yeah, and last thing, the AI is really helping me a ton of times, like with grammar mistakes or something like that. The AI can help instantly without opening another app to fix that for you. Even when I'm typing this, I ask their AI to fix my grammar.Pros- Good camera
- Nice AI
- Great performance
- Long lasting battery
- Good durability
Cons- Curve Screen
- 9.6
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - Got it on discount for 450usd. Best purchase for what it offers
There is nothing to complain about aside the selfie camera quality with the stock camera app. But the selfie becomes so good with the AGC GCAM with the designated agc lib config for this model. Also the camera app feels laggy too
The devs are intentionally ruining the camera stability and quality of the stock camera apps with updates.. Luckily we have gcam support and AGC works best, especially selfiesPros- Rear camera
- Selfies with agc gcam
- Good performance for causal use (i don't game)
- Good display
- Battery is okay for a day use
- Design
Cons- Bad selfie quality (AGC GCAM is best for selfies)
- No headphones jack since it's not IP68
- No support for 32bit apps
- Mediocre camera zooming quality
- Sluggish camera app
- 9
- Screen8.7
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - I changed from Xiaomi 14T, I'm very pleasantly surprised.
Very good looking with a friendly and well thought out interface. In my Xiaomi 14T starm the battery lasted 1-1.5 days, in honor 2 days. Screen in less saturated than in 14T.
Pros- screen
- battery
- magicOS 9 interface
- very fast fingerprint scaner
Cons- you have to hit the speaker in the ear well
- extremely slippery cover
- 9
- Screen10
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers - A Complete Package Phone
I've been using the phone for about a month now. And all I can say is that this phone comes with everything that I need, Good buy!
Pros- Great Screen
- Good Set of Cameras
- Great design
- Good Chipset
- Thumpy speakers
- Great OS
Cons- Does not come with IP68/69 protection
- OS updates are delayed from where I am
- 9.9
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 17 days ago
- Image gallery 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Pros & Cons 1 year ago
- Name, Aliases, Market, Storage, SIM card 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- RAM 2 years ago
- Usable surface, Photos, Photos 2 years ago
Score
- 7.8 Design & Materials
- 7.9 Performance & Hardware
- 8.5 Camera
- 8.1 Connectivity
- 7.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
