you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Honor 70 reviews by real users Honor 70
- Ki Cost-effective Score8.3
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Camera quality
- Design
- NFC
Cons- Fingerprint unlock
- No good for gaming
- Sound
- 6.67"OledFHD+20:9
- 178 g73.3 mm161.4 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 778 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 600.525
- 4800 mAh
- 1 54 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 IMX800 23SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- 9
- 0
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.7
- Performance8.4
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Performance & Hardware
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Camera
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Connectivity
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 40%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 10%Two days or more
10 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 90%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 10%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
10 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 56%Every six months
- 44%Every two months or less
10 reviews
User reviews
- AutoOkay, more pros than cons :)
I’ve been using Honor 70 for almost a year, the phone is excellent, after Honor 30i, it’s just space, the performance is good for the middle segment, I played various games with ps dualsense, everything runs at maximum speed, although it’s better to sometimes set the frame rate to 30-45, and the normal frame rate screen, or it’s better to play in the refrigerator, it starts to heat up fiercely (genshin, lineage, Undecember, Diablo) (it runs super cool games on ultra, but gets hot like a stove) but displays graphics in average games on ultra (Call Of Duty, tanks, slaughter, NFS ) without lags, it doesn’t heat up at all, there are no lags at all, neither in the system nor in games, the camera is ok, good for memory or social networks.The screen is good, in reality it is stated that it costs 1 billion. colors and I see them, at first I couldn’t get used to it and couldn’t stop admiring it, everything I’ve seen and watched before is different beyond recognition, I’m especially pleased with the waterfall screen, this is the first time I’ve had such an experience, I really liked this screen, but when you use it for a long time and often when you're sitting on the phone, your eyes can get incredibly tired and fall off, PWM or what it's connected with, I don't know, but there are screens that are better and less harmful to the eyes (again, if you live with it and don't get out of the phone), fell from 180 cm (human height), screen down on linoleum and concrete, and I thought everything, hanariki to him, I had a hydro film, turned it over and not a crack or a falcon, just a little bubbles along the edges of the screen appeared on the hydra, smoothed it out and everything was ok, once I fell on the asphalt I survived with dignity, The battery holds up well, the charging is just super sound, it charges 3-4% per minute, very quickly, again, the 30i is generally a turtle compared to this background :) In general, I can say that I like the phone 8.5 out of 10.And also a very convenient data transfer, I just waited 10 minutes and my honor 30i turned into 70, theme, applications, contacts, settings, home screen, in general, absolutely everything moved from 30i to 70, very convenient. Recently there was a very cool system update from Android 12 to 13, just a bunch of cool goodies were thrown in, it’s just a pleasure to use the phone.
Pros- Power
- Frame
- Style
- Autonomy
- Charger
Cons- Screen
- Camera
View original review- 9.1
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoPretty good, it's surprising that with a UFS 2.2 storage type it's so fast
Very good cell phone, buy blindly if you are looking for a mid-range phone that is elegant, with good construction materials, power, and an outstanding camera. It has UFS 2.2, so it's going to be pretty fast. Normally people say that it has UFS 3.0, well no, in AnTuTu it shows that it is UFS 2.2 with reads of 1GB/s and writes of approximately 845MB/s. The battery lasts a long time, I quite like it. If you have it connected to a smart watch it suffers a lot, it downloads very quickly. The screen is great, no complaints there, 120hz is perfect. The operating system is very fluid, it's like having Huawei but without its invasive advertising, smooth and precise animations, I haven't had any software bugs so far. Of course, it came out with android 12 and it will reach android 14, a shame. Perfect signal, quickly connect to WiFi, nothing to say. Likewise the Bluetooth, no complaints. The sound is one of the things that I don't like, it has a speaker that is not very powerful and when you turn the sound up to the maximum it tends to distort a bit. It just complies. The camera for photos is excellent, if you know how to take photos you will love it, very versatile, yes, with situations with a lot of exposure it does not tend to make a good HDR and also usually struggles a lot with the white balance, after that it is a excellent camera for photos. In the case of video recording, I quite like it, I'm not complaining, it records up to 4K 30fps with the rear and with the front in Full HD at 60fps, it has many recording modes. At night it records surprisingly well, I like it.And finally, the Snapdragon 778G Plus 5G continues to fight, a very good mid-range processor, sometimes I feel that it does not have a mid-range performance, very outstanding, it does not tend to heat up, it runs the games correctly and smoothly, until the heavier, a decent processor for demanding tasks. Basically it is an excellent cell phone.
Pros- Camera
- Battery
- Processor
- Fluency
- Fast charge
- 120hz display
Cons- Does not have wireless charging
- It does not have stereo sound
- It does not have a good vibration motor
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoGood device even if bulky
Mid range phone with very good capabilities and good camera. Really powerful battery. Thin and light design even if the screen is quite large and curved, so you have to get used to it. Under-screen imprint not always responsive
Pros- Light
- Camera
- Drums
- Performance under stress
Cons- Curved monitor
- Fingerprint
View original review- 8.4
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's not as good as they say
What fails the most is the fingerprint reader: two out of three times it does not recognize the fingerprint. The performance is acceptable. Nothing extraordinary. With demanding games it responds badly.
Pros- His design
Cons- The fingerprint reader very bad
View original review- 3.2
- Screen5.5
- Performance3.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoBEAUTIFUL BUT IMPROVEMENT
It is a beautiful cell phone, aesthetic with a very elegant appearance, the performance is from good to above, it is more high-end than average, I dislike the very real tonls that the screen has since I am used to saturated colors and therefore more than I put something warm on it, it is still very little saturation
Pros- Design
- Camera
- Performance
Cons- Sound
- Color
View original review- 9.2
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoPremium mobile at a mid-range price
It is a mobile that complies with everything and has the appearance of a 1000-euro mobile. I love the design, a very well used front, the screen hardly has frames, it is thin and light. The battery does not fall short despite how thin it is and on top of that it charges very quickly with its charger. The screen looks spectacular, very bright even in full sun and on top of that very fluid with 120 hz. The processor despite not being top of the range, the truth is that it complies with everything even while playing, more than enough for any user. The rear cameras are its strong point, it takes spectacular photos in normal and wide-angle mode and a highly stabilized video. The selfie camera isn't that great, but it's not bad. The sound is of quality, with a sufficient volume although not the highest, and it is not stereo.
Pros- rear cameras
- Design
- Screen
- Weight
- Price
Cons- non-stereo sound
- Slippery
- android 12 still
View original review- 9.5
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 8.6
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- 9.6
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoBalanced
Great phone, very balanced, good performance for both day-to-day apps and somewhat demanding games, comfortable in the light hand and with a very successful photographic section, a fairly good screen and great battery life, up to 9h of screen on per charge, the worst for the price it has... a single speaker
Pros- Most
Cons- Audio
View original review- 9.8
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 6 months ago
- Pros & Cons 7 months ago
- Bluetooth, Features 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
- Aliases, Market 1 year ago
- On Sale 1 year ago
- Weight 1 year ago
- Camera, Processor, Screen Type, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
Score
- 7.9 Design & Materials
- 6.9 Performance & Hardware
- 7.4 Camera
- 8.1 Connectivity
- 6.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.