you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Honor X7c reviews by real users Honor X7c
- 6.77"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 196 g76.8 mm166.9 mm8.1 mm
- SnapD. 685 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 321.000 v10
- 6000 mAh 35 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 6
- 3
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.8
- Camera6.9
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery8.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a good phone for undemanding daily use, praising its durability and clean system. They appreciate its value for money in the low-end segment, though some find its price a bit high. It's suitable for basic tasks and light gaming.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen receives mixed reviews, with criticism that it doesn't reach the promised 120 Hz, limiting itself to 90 Hz or 60 Hz in games.
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily tasks and light games, though the processor is criticized for being old and limited.
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is one of its weakest points, delivering improvable results and limitations in video, especially in low light.
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity includes NFC, which is positively rated. However, the absence or malfunction of the gyroscope is noted.
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, providing outstanding autonomy of up to two days and very efficient fast charging.
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 10%Two days or more
10 reviews
Software
- 20%It comes with a clean operating system
- 80%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
10 reviews
- 0%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 56%Every six months
- 33%Every two months or less
10 reviews
- AutoI recommend the phone, but only for everyday, non-demanding use.
The phone is good, but not for heavy use, as it falls short and overheats. It's also not very water-resistant, as it only has scratches from drops of 1 or 1.5 meters. Overall, its system is clean and user-friendly; I have no complaints because it doesn't fail me and its battery life is incredibly long.
Pros- Battery
- Burden
- System
Cons- Camera
- Screen
View original review- 7.2
- Screen7.2
- Performance5.6
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoI bought it for 16 thousand. It's perfect for my grandmother for the next 4 years.
The pros of this phone: 1. Good battery life. 2. Feels great in the hand, even though it's a shovel. 3. It has NFC, which is essential for me. 4. It's resistant to damage. Let's go over the cons. 1. They claim 120 Hz, but that's not true. 2. How can you even put a 2019 processor in a 2024 phone? Even slightly improving it significantly impacted the interface speed and camera quality. 3. The camera is about 45% better than my very old Samsung A30, I think it could be better. 4. My uncle has the same phone, and it bent in his back pocket while working on his robot, but it's not critical, it's noticeable if you just look at it, it doesn't affect anything.
Pros- autonomy
- Strength
Cons- Push a newer process
- Cameras +-
- Bending strength
View original review- 6.8
- Screen8.0
- Performance5.0
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoA 6/10 for a low-end model
A major strength of this phone is its battery and drop protection. Its RAM is quite good for less demanding social media, and it performs quite well for light games like Blood Strike, Clash Royale, Free Fire, and DB Legends. The temperature reaches about 43°C while gaming, but you don't feel the heat at all, even after extended periods of use. The battery lasts between a day and a half and two days on a full charge with constant use, including social media, light games, and watching videos, without power saving mode enabled. Fast charging reaches 100% in 45 minutes to an hour. Holding down the button increases fast charging speed, but it sometimes gets a little warmer during this process. A significant drawback is the screen refresh rate. It promises up to 120Hz, but when the highest refresh rate is enabled in the settings, it doesn't reach the advertised 120Hz, only 90Hz on the home screen. In games, it's limited to 60Hz, and on some social media platforms, it also drops to 60Hz. On Instagram, WhatsApp runs at around 90Hz, which provides a fairly smooth screen. As for multitasking, it's not too bad; it's actually quite fast for a low-end phone. If you want to play games and multitask extensively, I recommend looking for another option.
Pros- Battery Life
- Fast charging
- Endurance
Cons- Screen
- Processor
- Refreshment rate
- Camera
View original review- 5.5
- Screen7.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery10
View answers - 9.2
- Screen7.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoExcellent quality if you are not looking for games
During this time I have noticed that the fluidity is outstanding, the applications you want remain for hours, and the battery is a delight all day and I still have 30% at the end of the day
Pros- Battery
- 120hz auto
- Dual speaker
- Charges in one hour
Cons- Video at 30fps
- IPS display
- Low quality of games
- Gyroscope
View original review- 7.7
- Screen9.0
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Usable surface 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Inches, Resolution, Resolution, Density, Camera, Camera, Capacity (mAh), Operating System, Processor, Resolution, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera 1 year ago
Score
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 6.2 Performance & Hardware
- 5.9 Camera
- 6.4 Connectivity
- 7.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
